Preparation of highly monodisperse droplet in a T‐junction microfluidic device

In our previous work, a new flow route was developed—a so-called perpendicular shear force–induced droplet formation—in a self-designed simple T-junction microchannel device. In this work, the crossflowing rupture technique was used to prepare monodisperse droplets in a similar device and successfully prepared monodisperse droplets ranging from 50 to 500 μm with polydispersity index (σ) values of <2%. Two kinds of flow patterns of plug flow and drop flow in the T-junction microchannels could be formed. By changes in the surfactant concentration, the interfacial tension and the wetting ability varied, and the disordered or ordered two-phase flow patterns could be controlled. Evolutions of the contact angle of the oil in contact with the wall surface were explained by the adsorption of surfactant molecules to the solid–liquid interface. The increase of continuous phase flow rate and viscosity resulted in the decrease of the droplet size, and the droplet size was correlated with capillary number Ca. By comparing the variation range of drop size using the two methods, it was found that the method of perpendicular flow-induced droplet formation can control the drop size over a much wider range. © 2006 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 2006

[1]  H. Fujita,et al.  Silicon array of elongated through-holes for monodisperse emulsion droplets , 2002 .

[2]  G. Trägårdh,et al.  Membrane emulsification — a literature review , 2000 .

[3]  P. Umbanhowar,et al.  Monodisperse Emulsion Generation via Drop Break Off in a Coflowing Stream , 2000 .

[4]  R. Ismagilov,et al.  Effects of viscosity on droplet formation and mixing in microfluidic channels , 2004 .

[5]  Helen Song,et al.  Millisecond kinetics on a microfluidic chip using nanoliters of reagents. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[6]  Yuji Kikuchi,et al.  Regular-sized cell creation in microchannel emulsification by visual microprocessing method , 1997 .

[7]  G. Whitesides,et al.  A prototype two-dimensional capillary electrophoresis system fabricated in poly(dimethylsiloxane). , 2002, Analytical chemistry.

[8]  D. Weitz,et al.  Geometrically mediated breakup of drops in microfluidic devices. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[9]  R. Ismagilov,et al.  Screening of protein crystallization conditions on a microfluidic chip using nanoliter-size droplets. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[10]  V. Cristini,et al.  Theory and numerical simulation of droplet dynamics in complex flows--a review. , 2004, Lab on a chip.

[11]  Jianhong Xu,et al.  Experimental and theoretical approaches on droplet formation from a micrometer screen hole , 2005 .

[12]  Magalie Faivre,et al.  Microfluidic flow focusing: Drop size and scaling in pressure versus flow‐rate‐driven pumping , 2005, Electrophoresis.

[13]  J. Burns,et al.  The intensification of rapid reactions in multiphase systems using slug flow in capillaries. , 2001, Lab on a chip.

[14]  Patrick Tabeling,et al.  Ordered and disordered patterns in two-phase flows in microchannels. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[15]  G. Luo,et al.  Shear force induced monodisperse droplet formation in a microfluidic device by controlling wetting properties. , 2006, Lab on a chip.

[16]  Thomas G. Mason,et al.  Shear Rupturing of Droplets in Complex Fluids , 1997 .

[17]  S. Quake,et al.  Dynamic pattern formation in a vesicle-generating microfluidic device. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[18]  Toshiro Higuchi,et al.  Droplet formation in a microchannel network. , 2002, Lab on a chip.

[19]  Vittorio Cristini,et al.  Design of microfluidic channel geometries for the control of droplet volume, chemical concentration, and sorting. , 2004, Lab on a chip.

[20]  Mitsutoshi Nakajima,et al.  The generation of highly monodisperse droplets through the breakup of hydrodynamically focused microthread in a microfluidic device , 2004 .

[21]  H. Stone,et al.  Formation of dispersions using “flow focusing” in microchannels , 2003 .