Measuring the effect of incremental angles of wheelchair tilt on interface pressure among individuals with spinal cord injury

Study design:This study was a repeated measures study.Objectives:The objective was to systematically measure the relative reduction in interface pressure (IP) at the ischial tuberosities (IT) and sacrum through 10° increments of tilt in a manual wheelchair among individuals with motor complete spinal cord injury (SCI).Setting:This study was carried out in Manitoba, Canada.Methods:A total of 18 adults with ASIA A or B level of injury were recruited through an out-patient SCI clinic. Using a standardized protocol, participants were tilted in 10° increments between 0° and 50°, and IP readings were obtained at the IT and sacrum using pressure mapping technology. Relative pressure reduction from baseline was calculated and compared between tilt angles.Results:Tilt angle had a highly significant effect on pressure reduction at the IT (P=0.000) and the cosine relationship between these variables was expressed as quadratic. Reduction in sacral pressure did not occur until 30° tilt, with increased loading at smaller tilt angles. Pressure reduction at the IT and sacrum was not significantly different for tetraplegic and paraplegic participants.Conclusion:Small tilt angles are more suitable for postural control than pressure management. A minimum tilt of 30° is required to initiate unloading the sacrum and to achieve a clinically important reduction in pressure at the IT. Larger tilt angles resulted in more substantial pressure reduction than previously reported. Tilt-in-space appears to have similar benefits for individuals with paraplegia and tetraplegia.

[1]  D. Hobson Comparative effects of posture on pressure and shear at the body-seat interface. , 1992, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[2]  J. Drukker,et al.  Chair configuration and balance control in persons with spinal cord injury. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  M. Brandstater,et al.  Efficacy of three measures to relieve pressure in seated persons with spinal cord injury. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  Patrice L. (Tamar) Weiss,et al.  Effect of seated posture on interface pressure in children who are able-bodied and who have myelomeningocele , 2000, Disability and rehabilitation.

[5]  J. B. Reswick,et al.  Experience at Rancho Los Amigos Hospital With Devices and Techniques to Prevent Pressure Sores , 1976 .

[6]  Jean Dansereau,et al.  Powered Tilt/Recline Systems: Why and How Are They Used? , 2003, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[7]  Brandstater Me,et al.  Efficacy of three measures to relieve pressure in seated persons with spinal cord injury , 1994 .

[8]  Stephen Sprigle,et al.  Use of power tilt systems in everyday life , 2009, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[9]  Rachid Aissaoui,et al.  Biomechanics of Manual Wheelchair Propulsion in Elderly: System Tilt and Back Recline Angles , 2002, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[10]  J. Dansereau,et al.  Analysis of sliding and pressure distribution during a repositioning of persons in a simulator chair , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[11]  Larry Press,et al.  Reliability of Bench Tests of Interface Pressure , 2003, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[12]  D. Walsh,et al.  Impact of sitting time on seat-interface pressure and on pressure mapping with multiple sclerosis patients. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  William Z Rymer,et al.  Periodically relieving ischial sitting load to decrease the risk of pressure ulcers. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  Rosemarie Cooper,et al.  RESNA Position on the Application of Tilt, Recline, and Elevating Legrests for Wheelchairs , 2009, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[15]  O. Nwaobi,et al.  Seating orientations and upper extremity function in children with cerebral palsy. , 1987, Physical therapy.

[16]  Ann Dewey,et al.  A Qualitative Study Comparing the Experiences of Tilt-in-Space Wheelchair Use and Conventional Wheelchair Use by Clients Severely Disabled with Multiple Sclerosis , 2004 .

[17]  S. Burns,et al.  Seating pressures with conventional and dynamic wheelchair cushions in tetraplegia. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  Stephen Sprigle,et al.  Physiologic effects and design considerations of tilt and recline wheelchairs , 1997 .