Neural responses to the production and comprehension of syntax in identical utterances

Following up on an earlier positron emission tomography (PET) experiment (Indefrey et al., 2001), we used a scene description paradigm to investigate whether a posterior inferior frontal region subserving syntactic encoding for speaking is also involved in syntactic parsing during listening. In the language production part of the experiment, subjects described visually presented scenes using either sentences, sequences of noun phrases, or sequences of syntactically unrelated words. In the language comprehension part of the experiment, subjects were auditorily presented with the same kinds of utterances and judged whether they matched the visual scenes. We were able to replicate the previous finding of a region in caudal Broca's area that is sensitive to the complexity of syntactic encoding in language production. In language comprehension, no hemodynamic activation differences due to syntactic complexity were found. Given that correct performance in the judgment task did not require syntactic processing of the auditory stimuli, the results suggest that the degree to which listeners recruit syntactic processing resources in language comprehension may be a function of the syntactic demands of the task or the stimulus material.

[1]  M. Just,et al.  Brain Activation Modulated by Sentence Comprehension , 1996, Science.

[2]  A. Schleicher,et al.  Broca's region revisited: Cytoarchitecture and intersubject variability , 1999, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[3]  Gerard Kempen,et al.  Could grammatical encoding and grammatical decoding be subserved by the same processing module? , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[4]  Karl Zilles,et al.  The Developing European Computerized Human Brain Database for All Imaging Modalities , 1996, NeuroImage.

[5]  H. Herzog,et al.  Quantitation of Regional Cerebral Blood Flow with 15O-Butanol and Positron Emission Tomography in Humans , 1996, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[6]  J. Gore,et al.  An Event-Related fMRI Study of Implicit Phrase-Level Syntactic and Semantic Processing , 1999, NeuroImage.

[7]  S. Bookheimer,et al.  Form and Content Dissociating Syntax and Semantics in Sentence Comprehension , 1999, Neuron.

[8]  P Hagoort,et al.  A neural correlate of syntactic encoding during speech production , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  A. Friederici,et al.  Auditory Language Comprehension: An Event-Related fMRI Study on the Processing of Syntactic and Lexical Information , 2000, Brain and Language.

[10]  David B Pisoni,et al.  PET imaging of differential cortical activation by monaural speech and nonspeech stimuli , 2002, Hearing Research.

[11]  A. Damasio,et al.  Brain and language. , 1993, Scientific American.

[12]  R. C. Oldfield THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .

[13]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Real-time semantic compensation in patients with agrammatic comprehension: Electrophysiological evidence for multiple-route plasticity , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  A. Syrota,et al.  The Cortical Representation of Speech , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  A. Friederici Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  Y. Grodzinsky The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca's area , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[17]  Peter Indefrey,et al.  Hirnaktivierungen bei syntaktischer Sprachverarbeitung: Eine Meta-Analyse , 2004 .

[18]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Common and Distinct Neural Substrates for Pragmatic, Semantic, and Syntactic Processing of Spoken Sentences: An fMRI Study , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  E. Kaan,et al.  The brain circuitry of syntactic comprehension , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  A. Friederici,et al.  Broca's area in the human brain is involved in the selection of grammatical gender for language production: evidence from event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2002, Neuroscience Letters.

[21]  A. A. Wijers,et al.  Localizing components of a complex task: sentence processing and working memory , 1998, Neuroreport.

[22]  J. Gee,et al.  Neural basis for sentence comprehension: Grammatical and short‐term memory components , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[23]  N. Alpert,et al.  Localization of Syntactic Comprehension by Positron Emission Tomography , 1996, Brain and Language.

[24]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  11 – Shared Components of Production and Perception , 1982 .

[25]  David Caplan,et al.  Effects of Syntactic Structure and Propositional Number on Patterns of Regional Cerebral Blood Flow , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  G. Waters,et al.  Activation of Broca's area by syntactic processing under conditions of concurrent articulation , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[27]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[28]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  D. Shankweiler,et al.  An Event-related Neuroimaging Study Distinguishing Form and Content in Sentence Processing , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  G. Waters,et al.  PET Studies of Syntactic Processing with Auditory Sentence Presentation , 1999, NeuroImage.

[31]  D. V. von Cramon,et al.  Neurocognition of auditory sentence comprehension: event related fMRI reveals sensitivity to syntactic violations and task demands. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[32]  D. Pisoni,et al.  PET imaging of cochlear-implant and normal-hearing subjects listening to speech and nonspeech , 1999, Hearing Research.

[33]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  A syntactic specialization for Broca's area. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.