Species Distribution Models: Ecological Explanation and Prediction Across Space and Time

Species distribution models (SDMs) are numerical tools that combine observations of species occurrence or abundance with environmental estimates. They are used to gain ecological and evolutionary insights and to predict distributions across landscapes, sometimes requiring extrapolation in space and time. SDMs are now widely used across terrestrial, freshwater, and marine realms. Differences in methods between disciplines reflect both differences in species mobility and in “established use.” Model realism and robustness is influenced by selection of relevant predictors and modeling method, consideration of scale, how the interplay between environmental and geographic factors is handled, and the extent of extrapolation. Current linkages between SDM practice and ecological theory are often weak, hindering progress. Remaining challenges include: improvement of methods for modeling presence-only data and for model selection and evaluation; accounting for biotic interactions; and assessing model uncertainty.

[1]  A. Murray The geographical distribution of mammals. By Andrew Murray. , 1866 .

[2]  A. Murray The geographical distribution of mammals , 1866 .

[3]  J. Grinnell,et al.  The Origin and Distribution of the Chest-Nut-Backed Chickadee , 1904 .

[4]  Robert H. Whittaker,et al.  Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains , 1956 .

[5]  R. Macarthur,et al.  Population Ecology of Some Warblers of Northeastern Coniferous Forests , 1958 .

[6]  David E. Capen The use of multivariate statistics in studies of wildlife habitat , 1981 .

[7]  Thomas B. Starr,et al.  Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity , 1982 .

[8]  Mike P. Austin,et al.  Continuum Concept, Ordination Methods, and Niche Theory , 1985 .

[9]  D. Padilla,et al.  Ecological neighborhoods: scaling environmental patterns , 1987 .

[10]  Trevor H. Booth,et al.  Niche analysis and tree species introduction , 1988 .

[11]  A. O. Nicholls,et al.  Measurement of the realized qualitative niche: environmental niches of five Eucalyptus species , 1990 .

[12]  S. Levin The problem of pattern and scale in ecology , 1992 .

[13]  P. Legendre Spatial Autocorrelation: Trouble or New Paradigm? , 1993 .

[14]  B. Manly,et al.  Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. , 1994 .

[15]  David G. Reid,et al.  Identifying the effects of oceanographic features and zooplankton on prespawning herring abundance using generalized additive models , 1997 .

[16]  N. LeRoy Poff,et al.  Landscape Filters and Species Traits: Towards Mechanistic Understanding and Prediction in Stream Ecology , 1997, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[17]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach , 2001 .

[18]  David R. B. Stockwell,et al.  The GARP modelling system: problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction , 1999, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[19]  E W Steyerberg,et al.  Stepwise selection in small data sets: a simulation study of bias in logistic regression analysis. , 1999, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[20]  N. Zimmermann,et al.  Predictive mapping of alpine grasslands in Switzerland: Species versus community approach , 1999 .

[21]  Simon Ferrier,et al.  Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression , 2000 .

[22]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology , 2000 .

[23]  R. Mac Nally,et al.  Regression and model-building in conservation biology, biogeography and ecology: The distinction between – and reconciliation of – ‘predictive’ and ‘explanatory’ models , 2000 .

[24]  A. Dugmore,et al.  Biogeographical change in the tiger, Panthera tigris , 2000 .

[25]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2000 .

[26]  Jason Jones,et al.  Habitat Selection Studies in Avian Ecology: A Critical Review , 2001 .

[27]  David Whitehead,et al.  Soil and atmospheric water deficits and the distribution of New Zealand's indigenous tree species , 2001 .

[28]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  Towards a hierarchical framework for modelling the spatial distribution of animals , 2001 .

[29]  J. Leathwick,et al.  COMPETITIVE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN TREE SPECIES IN NEW ZEALAND'S OLD‐GROWTH INDIGENOUS FORESTS , 2001 .

[30]  E. Fleishman,et al.  Modeling and Predicting Species Occurrence Using Broad‐Scale Environmental Variables: an Example with Butterflies of the Great Basin , 2001 .

[31]  M. Austin Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling , 2002 .

[32]  T. Hamazaki SPATIOTEMPORAL PREDICTION MODELS OF CETACEAN HABITATS IN THE MID‐WESTERN NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN (FROM CAPE HATTERAS, NORTH CAROLINA, U.S.A. TO NOVA SCOTIA, CANADA) , 2002 .

[33]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY RATES WHEN DETECTION PROBABILITIES ARE LESS THAN ONE , 2002, Ecology.

[34]  Gretchen G. Moisen,et al.  Comparing five modelling techniques for predicting forest characteristics , 2002 .

[35]  Jennifer L. Dungan,et al.  A balanced view of scale in spatial statistical analysis , 2002 .

[36]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[37]  M. Burgman,et al.  Bias in species range estimates from minimum convex polygons: implications for conservation and options for improved planning , 2003 .

[38]  D. Richardson,et al.  Inferring Process from Pattern in Plant Invasions: A Semimechanistic Model Incorporating Propagule Pressure and Environmental Factors , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[39]  T. Dawson,et al.  Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? , 2003 .

[40]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  MODELING ABUNDANCE EFFECTS IN DISTANCE SAMPLING , 2004 .

[41]  William N. Venables,et al.  GLMs, GAMs and GLMMs: an overview of theory for applications in fisheries research , 2004 .

[42]  JAMES R. MILLER,et al.  Spatial Extrapolation: The Science of Predicting Ecological Patterns and Processes , 2004 .

[43]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  Hierarchical, Multi-scale decomposition of species-environment relationships , 2002, Landscape Ecology.

[44]  C. Graham,et al.  INTEGRATING PHYLOGENETICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL NICHE MODELS TO EXPLORE SPECIATION MECHANISMS IN DENDROBATID FROGS , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[45]  A. Peterson,et al.  New developments in museum-based informatics and applications in biodiversity analysis. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[46]  Darren J. Kriticos,et al.  The fundamental and realized niche of the Monterey Pine aphid, Essigella californica (Essig) (Hemiptera: Aphididae): implications for managing softwood plantations in Australia , 2004 .

[47]  Elgene O. Box,et al.  Predicting physiognomic vegetation types with climate variables , 1981, Vegetatio.

[48]  Michael Drielsma,et al.  Extended statistical approaches to modelling spatial pattern in biodiversity in northeast New South Wales. II. Community-level modelling , 2002, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[49]  B. Cade,et al.  QUANTILE REGRESSION REVEALS HIDDEN BIAS AND UNCERTAINTY IN HABITAT MODELS , 2005 .

[50]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  MANAGING LANDSCAPES FOR CONSERVATION UNDER UNCERTAINTY , 2005 .

[51]  A. Prasad,et al.  Newer Classification and Regression Tree Techniques: Bagging and Random Forests for Ecological Prediction , 2006, Ecosystems.

[52]  W. Thuiller,et al.  Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[53]  D. Richardson,et al.  Niche‐based modelling as a tool for predicting the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale , 2005, Global change biology.

[54]  Sari C. Saunders,et al.  Identifying scales of pattern in ecological data: a comparison of lacunarity, spectral and wavelet analyses , 2005 .

[55]  M. Araújo,et al.  Validation of species–climate impact models under climate change , 2005 .

[56]  Boris Schröder,et al.  Analysis of pattern–process interactions based on landscape models—Overview, general concepts, and methodological issues , 2006 .

[57]  Jake F. Weltzin,et al.  The biogeography of prediction error: why does the introduced range of the fire ant over-predict its native range? , 2006 .

[58]  Shanshan Wu,et al.  Building statistical models to analyze species distributions. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[59]  Mark S. Boyce,et al.  Modelling distribution and abundance with presence‐only data , 2006 .

[60]  S. Gaines,et al.  Moving beyond assumptions to understand abundance distributions across the ranges of species. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[61]  M. Sykes,et al.  Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic envelope modelling under climate change , 2006 .

[62]  A. Townsend Peterson,et al.  Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data , 2006 .

[63]  A. Peterson Uses and requirements of ecological niche models and related distributional models , 2006 .

[64]  J. Drake,et al.  Modelling ecological niches with support vector machines , 2006 .

[65]  Takashi Saitoh,et al.  Constraints to projecting the effects of climate change on mammals , 2006 .

[66]  T. Dawson,et al.  Model‐based uncertainty in species range prediction , 2006 .

[67]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  Revisiting Heritable Variation and Limits to Species Distribution: Recent Developments , 2006 .

[68]  Rich Caruana,et al.  An empirical comparison of supervised learning algorithms , 2006, ICML.

[69]  Robert P. Anderson,et al.  Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions , 2006 .

[70]  B. Reineking,et al.  Constrain to perform: Regularization of habitat models , 2006 .

[71]  Thiago F. Rangel,et al.  Towards an integrated computational tool for spatial analysis in macroecology and biogeography , 2006 .

[72]  Jane Elith,et al.  Error and uncertainty in habitat models , 2006 .

[73]  M. Araújo,et al.  Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling , 2006 .

[74]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Spatial modelling of biodiversity at the community level , 2006 .

[75]  R. Hijmans,et al.  Climate change and the origin of migratory pathways in the Swainson's thrush, Catharus ustulatus , 2006 .

[76]  Greg Hughes,et al.  Migration rate limitations on climate change‐induced range shifts in Cape Proteaceae , 2006 .

[77]  Bruce McCune,et al.  Non-parametric habitat models with automatic interactions , 2006 .

[78]  B. Bestelmeyer,et al.  Linking the concept of scale to studies of biological diversity: evolving approaches and tools , 2006 .

[79]  Robert P Freckleton,et al.  Why do we still use stepwise modelling in ecology and behaviour? , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[80]  K. Davies,et al.  Experimental verification of ecological niche modeling in a heterogeneous environment. , 2006, Ecology.

[81]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Hierarchical Spatiotemporal Matrix Models for Characterizing Invasions , 2007, Biometrics.

[82]  Bryan C. Carstens,et al.  Distribution modelling and statistical phylogeography: an integrative framework for generating and testing alternative biogeographical hypotheses , 2007 .

[83]  Mark New,et al.  Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[84]  Jorge Soberón Grinnellian and Eltonian niches and geographic distributions of species. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[85]  Jennifer A. Miller,et al.  Incorporating spatial dependence in predictive vegetation models , 2007 .

[86]  R. G. Davies,et al.  Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data : a review , 2007 .

[87]  C. Dormann Promising the future? Global change projections of species distributions , 2007 .

[88]  Frank M. Schurr,et al.  Colonization and persistence ability explain the extent to which plant species fill their potential range , 2007 .

[89]  M. Austin Species distribution models and ecological theory: A critical assessment and some possible new approaches , 2007 .

[90]  John E. Kutzbach,et al.  Projected distributions of novel and disappearing climates by 2100 AD , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[91]  W. L. Chadderton,et al.  Dispersal, disturbance and the contrasting biogeographies of New Zealand’s diadromous and non‐diadromous fish species , 2008 .

[92]  G. Foody GIS: biodiversity applications , 2008 .

[93]  L. Vierling,et al.  Lidar: shedding new light on habitat characterization and modeling , 2008 .

[94]  Julian D Olden,et al.  Machine Learning Methods Without Tears: A Primer for Ecologists , 2008, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[95]  N. Swenson The past and future influence of geographic information systems on hybrid zone, phylogeographic and speciation research , 2008, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[96]  M. Kearney,et al.  Modelling species distributions without using species distributions: the cane toad in Australia under current and future climates , 2008 .

[97]  J Elith,et al.  A working guide to boosted regression trees. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[98]  Alberto Jiménez-Valverde,et al.  Not as good as they seem: the importance of concepts in species distribution modelling , 2008 .

[99]  J. Diniz‐Filho,et al.  Spatial analysis improves species distribution modelling during range expansion , 2008, Biology Letters.

[100]  J. Lobo,et al.  Historical bias in biodiversity inventories affects the observed environmental niche of the species , 2008 .

[101]  C. Graham,et al.  Integrating GIS-based environmental data into evolutionary biology. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[102]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  Predicting extinction risks under climate change: coupling stochastic population models with dynamic bioclimatic habitat models , 2008, Biology Letters.

[103]  B. Schröder Challenges of species distribution modeling belowground , 2008 .

[104]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Ecogeographical rules: elements of a synthesis , 2008 .

[105]  Benjamin Planque,et al.  Quantile regression models for fish recruitment-environment relationships : four case studies , 2008 .

[106]  Volker C. Radeloff,et al.  Satellite image texture and a vegetation index predict avian biodiversity in the Chihuahuan Desert of New Mexico , 2009 .

[107]  G. Mittelbach,et al.  Is There a Latitudinal Gradient in the Importance of Biotic Interactions , 2009 .

[108]  J. Elith,et al.  Do they? How do they? WHY do they differ? On finding reasons for differing performances of species distribution models , 2009 .

[109]  Steven J. Phillips,et al.  Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: implications for background and pseudo-absence data. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[110]  B. Willis,et al.  Systematic and Biogeographical Patterns in the Reproductive Biology of Scleractinian Corals , 2009 .

[111]  M. Kearney,et al.  Mechanistic niche modelling: combining physiological and spatial data to predict species' ranges. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[112]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd Edition , 2001, Springer Series in Statistics.

[113]  Michael Drielsma,et al.  Rapid evaluation of metapopulation persistence in highly variegated landscapes. , 2009 .

[114]  Jennifer A. Miller,et al.  Mapping Species Distributions: Spatial Inference and Prediction , 2010 .

[115]  R. Pearson Species’ Distribution Modeling for Conservation Educators and Practitioners , 2010 .