Early lung cancer action project: a summary of the findings on baseline screening.

PURPOSE The Early Lung Cancer Action Project (ELCAP) is designed to evaluate baseline and annual repeat screening by low radiation dose computed tomography (low-dose CT) in persons at high-risk for lung cancer. METHODS Since starting in 1993, the ELCAP has enrolled 1,000 asymptomatic persons, 60 years of age or older, with at least 10 pack-years (1 pack per day for 10 years, or 2 packs per day for 5 years) of cigarette smoking, no prior cancer, and medically fit to undergo thoracic surgery. After a structured interview and informed consent, baseline chest radiographs and low-dose CT were obtained on each subject. The diagnostic work-up of screen-detected noncalcified pulmonary nodules (NCN) was guided by ELCAP recommendations which included short-term high-resolution CT follow-up for the smallest nodules. Baseline RESULTS On low-dose CT at baseline compared to chest radiography, NCN were detected three times as commonly (23% versus 7%), malignancies four times as commonly (2.7% versus 0.7%), and stage I malignancies six times as commonly (2.3% versus 0.4%). Of the 27 CT-detected cancers, 96% (26/27) were resectable; 85% (23/27) were stage I, and 83% (19 of the 23 stage I) were not seen on chest radiography. Following the ELCAP recommendations, biopsies were performed on 28 of the 233 subjects with NCN; 27 had a malignant and one a benign NCN. Another three individuals underwent biopsy outside of the ELCAP recommendations; all had benign NCNS: No one had thoracotomy for a benign nodule. CONCLUSION Baseline CT screening for lung cancer provides for detecting the disease at earlier and presumably more commonly curable stages in a cost-effective manner.

[1]  O. Miettinen,et al.  Screening for lung cancer: can it be cost-effective? , 2000, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[2]  A. K. Laird Dynamics of Tumour Growth: Comparison of Growth Rates and Extrapolation of Growth Curve to One Cell , 1965, British Journal of Cancer.

[3]  G. Byrnes,et al.  Screening for lung cancer. , 2004, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[4]  D. Eddy,et al.  Screening for lung cancer. , 1989, Annals of internal medicine.

[5]  E. Bergstralh,et al.  Screening for lung cancer. A critique of the mayo lung project , 1991, Cancer.

[6]  A. Mushlin,et al.  Is screening for breast cancer cost‐effective? , 1992, Cancer.

[7]  Setsuo Hirohashi,et al.  Small adenocarcinoma of the lung. Histologic characteristics and prognosis , 1995 .

[8]  Binsheng Zhao,et al.  Small pulmonary nodules: volumetrically determined growth rates based on CT evaluation. , 2000, Radiology.

[9]  Rajiv Gupta,et al.  Small pulmonary nodules: evaluation with repeat CT--preliminary experience. , 1999, Radiology.

[10]  C. Henschke Early lung cancer action project , 2000, Cancer.

[11]  S S Sagel,et al.  CT of the pulmonary nodule: a cooperative study. , 1986, Radiology.

[12]  O S Miettinen,et al.  Radiographic screening for cancer. Proposed paradigm for requisite research. , 1994, Clinical imaging.

[13]  V. P. Collins,et al.  Differentiation of benign and malignant pulmonary nodules by growth rate. , 1962, Radiology.

[14]  Tomotaka Sobue,et al.  Survival for clinical stage I lung cancer not surgically treated. Comparison between screen‐detected and symptom‐detected cases , 1992, Cancer.

[15]  M. Fahs,et al.  Cost Effectiveness of Cervical Cancer Screening for the Elderly , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[16]  W F Taylor,et al.  Lung cancer screening: the Mayo program. , 1986, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[17]  Feng Li,et al.  Mass screening for lung cancer with mobile spiral computed tomography scanner , 1998, The Lancet.

[18]  V. P. Collins,et al.  Observations on growth rates of human tumors. , 1956, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.

[19]  M. Melamed,et al.  The effect of surgical treatment on survival from early lung cancer. Implications for screening. , 1992, Chest.