As population densities have risen and settlements become increasingly crowded, wastewater effluent volumes have, not unexpectedly, also risen. The adverse impacts of effluent from housing estates (HEs) in suburban areas of Thailand, served by local wastewater management (WWM) systems, are of particular concern. Because of this problem, which reflects the poor performance of WWM systems, it has become increasingly important that the pivotal factors that hinder WWM improvements be identified and effective solutions be proposed and implemented. The goal of the research described in this paper was to determine the critical factors influencing WWM performance at HEs in suburban Bangkok, using multiple regression analysis. Three significant factors encompassing financial, social, institutional and general aspects were identified for each type of WWM system (community centralized and onsite). For the community centralized system, the key factors were house price, type of organization managing the HE, and the attitudes of the organization. For onsite systems, the three factors were total number of house units, direct experience with water pollution and percentage of occupied houses. These findings reflect the importance of having a WWM that employs an integrated approach rather than focusing on specific aspects in isolation from other factors. WWM performance could be improved if significant factors indicating high priority concerns were to be identified and properly applied. Addressing the priority concerns could, consequently, contribute to the development of appropriate environmental management measures, plans, and policies related to HE WWM.
[1]
B. Field.
Environmental Economics: An Introduction
,
1979
.
[2]
S Gray,et al.
Wastewater services for small communities.
,
2003,
Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.
[3]
Rashed M.Y. Al-Sa'ed,et al.
Sustainability Assessment of Onsite Sanitation Facilities in Ramallah-Albireh District with Emphasis on Technical, Socio-Cultural and Financial Aspects
,
2006
.
[4]
J. Newell.
Project Final Report
,
2005
.
[5]
Stephen E Mbuligwe,et al.
Assessment of performance of solid waste management contractors: a simple techno-social model and its application.
,
2004,
Waste management.
[6]
H A Bakir,et al.
Sustainable wastewater management for small communities in the Middle East and North Africa.
,
2001,
Journal of environmental management.
[7]
Peter A. Wilderer,et al.
Decentralized and centralized wastewater management: a challenge for technology developers
,
2000
.
[8]
Heinz A. Preisig,et al.
Indicators for the sustainability assessment of wastewater treatment systems
,
2002
.
[9]
Jonathan Parkinson,et al.
Decentralized wastewater management in peri-urban areas in low-income countries
,
2003
.
[10]
H Z Sarikaya,et al.
Joint operation of small wastewater treatment plants in southern Turkey.
,
2003,
Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.