Not All Next Generation Sequencing Diagnostics are Created Equal: Understanding the Nuances of Solid Tumor Assay Design for Somatic Mutation Detection

The molecular characterization of tumors using next generation sequencing (NGS) is an emerging diagnostic tool that is quickly becoming an integral part of clinical decision making. Cancer genomic profiling involves significant challenges including DNA quality and quantity, tumor heterogeneity, and the need to detect a wide variety of complex genetic mutations. Most available comprehensive diagnostic tests rely on primer based amplification or probe based capture methods coupled with NGS to detect hotspot mutation sites or whole regions implicated in disease. These tumor panels utilize highly customized bioinformatics pipelines to perform the difficult task of accurately calling cancer relevant alterations such as single nucleotide variations, small indels or large genomic alterations from the NGS data. In this review, we will discuss the challenges of solid tumor assay design/analysis and report a case study that highlights the need to include complementary technologies (i.e., arrays) and germline analysis in tumor testing to reliably identify copy number alterations and actionable variants.

[1]  R. Dhir,et al.  Optimization of the Affymetrix GeneChip Mapping 10K 2.0 Assay for Routine Clinical Use on Formalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded Tissues , 2008, Diagnostic molecular pathology : the American journal of surgical pathology, part B.

[2]  Z. Ning,et al.  Amplification-free Illumina sequencing-library preparation facilitates improved mapping and assembly of GC-biased genomes , 2009, Nature Methods.

[3]  Gonçalo R. Abecasis,et al.  The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools , 2009, Bioinform..

[4]  R. Tubbs,et al.  Out of the darkness and into the light: bright field in situ hybridisation for delineation of ERBB2 (HER2) status in breast carcinoma , 2010, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[5]  J. Yélamos,et al.  PARP-1 and PARP-2: New players in tumour development. , 2011, American journal of cancer research.

[6]  M. Ladanyi,et al.  Broad, Hybrid Capture–Based Next-Generation Sequencing Identifies Actionable Genomic Alterations in Lung Adenocarcinomas Otherwise Negative for Such Alterations by Other Genomic Testing Approaches , 2015, Clinical Cancer Research.

[7]  Philip M. Kim,et al.  Paired-End Mapping Reveals Extensive Structural Variation in the Human Genome , 2007, Science.

[8]  A. Sivachenko,et al.  Sensitive detection of somatic point mutations in impure and heterogeneous cancer samples , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[9]  Song Liu,et al.  Computational methods for detecting copy number variations in cancer genome using next generation sequencing: principles and challenges , 2013, Oncotarget.

[10]  A. Chaudhuri,et al.  HER2 Status and Benefit from Adjuvant Trastuzumab in Breast Cancer , 2008 .

[11]  R. Hansen,et al.  Molecular barcodes detect redundancy and contamination in hairpin-bisulfite PCR. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[12]  John M S Bartlett,et al.  Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. , 2014, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[13]  Theresa Zhang,et al.  Personalized genomic analyses for cancer mutation discovery and interpretation , 2015, Science Translational Medicine.

[14]  James A. Casbon,et al.  A method for counting PCR template molecules with application to next-generation sequencing , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[15]  P. Oefner,et al.  Rare variants in the ATM gene and risk of breast cancer , 2011, Breast Cancer Research.

[16]  F. Kokocinski,et al.  Application of next-generation sequencing technology for comprehensive aneuploidy screening of blastocysts in clinical preimplantation genetic screening cycles. , 2014, Human reproduction.

[17]  S. Hodgson,et al.  Mechanisms of inherited cancer susceptibility , 2007, Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B.

[18]  Z. Xuan,et al.  Genome-wide in situ exon capture for selective resequencing , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[19]  J. Lo,et al.  Correlation of DNA ploidy and histologic diagnosis from prostate core‐needle biopsies: Is DNA ploidy more sensitive than histology for the diagnosis of carcinoma in small specimens? , 1996, Journal of Surgical Oncology.

[20]  Harald Schumny,et al.  Next generation , 2005, Comput. Stand. Interfaces.

[21]  J. Silverman,et al.  Poor prognostic significance of unamplified chromosome 17 polysomy in invasive breast carcinoma , 2009, Modern Pathology.

[22]  M. Lavin,et al.  Ataxia-telangiectasia: from a rare disorder to a paradigm for cell signalling and cancer , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[23]  Peilin Jia,et al.  Detecting somatic point mutations in cancer genome sequencing data: a comparison of mutation callers , 2013, Genome Medicine.

[24]  Savita Shrivastava,et al.  Validation of a next-generation sequencing assay for clinical molecular oncology. , 2014, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[25]  D. Easton,et al.  ATM mutations and phenotypes in ataxia-telangiectasia families in the British Isles: expression of mutant ATM and the risk of leukemia, lymphoma, and breast cancer. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[26]  R. Wilson,et al.  BreakDancer: An algorithm for high resolution mapping of genomic structural variation , 2009, Nature Methods.

[27]  E. Perez,et al.  Breast cancer and aneusomy 17: implications for carcinogenesis and therapeutic response. , 2009, The Lancet. Oncology.

[28]  F. López-Ríos,et al.  Comparison of Testing Methods for the Detection of BRAF V600E Mutations in Malignant Melanoma: Pre-Approval Validation Study of the Companion Diagnostic Test for Vemurafenib , 2013, PloS one.

[29]  S. Gunn The vanguard has arrived in the clinical laboratory: array-based karyotyping for prognostic markers in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. , 2010, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[30]  Ash A. Alizadeh,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy number variation in breast cancer using DNA microarrays , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[31]  Qingguo Wang,et al.  Computational tools for copy number variation (CNV) detection using next-generation sequencing data: features and perspectives , 2013, BMC Bioinformatics.

[32]  S. Tangutoori,et al.  PARP inhibitors: A new era of targeted therapy. , 2015, Maturitas.

[33]  D. Slamon,et al.  Assessment of methods for tissue-based detection of the HER-2/neu alteration in human breast cancer: a direct comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[34]  Jay Shendure,et al.  Single molecule molecular inversion probes for targeted, high-accuracy detection of low-frequency variation , 2013, Genome research.

[35]  Gianluigi Zanetti,et al.  SEAL: a distributed short read mapping and duplicate removal tool , 2011, Bioinform..

[36]  Rachael Natrajan,et al.  Chromogenic and fluorescent in situ hybridization in breast cancer. , 2007, Human pathology.

[37]  M. Untch,et al.  Her-2/neu analysis in archival tissue samples of human breast cancer: comparison of immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[38]  Ash A. Alizadeh,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy-number changes using cDNA microarrays , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[39]  R. Abraham Cell cycle checkpoint signaling through the ATM and ATR kinases. , 2001, Genes & development.

[40]  Renato Martins,et al.  Validation and implementation of targeted capture and sequencing for the detection of actionable mutation, copy number variation, and gene rearrangement in clinical cancer specimens. , 2014, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[41]  M. Hidalgo,et al.  A commercial real-time PCR kit provides greater sensitivity than direct sequencing to detect KRAS mutations: a morphology-based approach in colorectal carcinoma. , 2010, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[42]  S. Ikegawa,et al.  Allele-specific PCR amplification due to sequence identity between a PCR primer and an amplicon : is direct sequencing so reliable? , 2002, Human Genetics.

[43]  S. Gunn,et al.  Clinical array-based karyotyping of breast cancer with equivocal HER2 status resolves gene copy number and reveals chromosome 17 complexity , 2010, BMC Cancer.

[44]  Gioele La Manno,et al.  Quantitative single-cell RNA-seq with unique molecular identifiers , 2013, Nature Methods.

[45]  A. Chinnaiyan,et al.  Clinical tumor sequencing: an incidental casualty of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics recommendations for reporting of incidental findings. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[46]  M. Dowsett,et al.  Standardization of HER2 testing: results of an international proficiency-testing ring study , 2007, Modern Pathology.

[47]  Nikhil Wagle,et al.  High-throughput detection of actionable genomic alterations in clinical tumor samples by targeted, massively parallel sequencing. , 2012, Cancer discovery.

[48]  Tom Royce,et al.  A comprehensive catalogue of somatic mutations from a human cancer genome , 2010, Nature.

[49]  D. de Jong,et al.  Whole-genome scanning by array comparative genomic hybridization as a clinical tool for risk assessment in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. , 2008, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[50]  D. Lopez-Terrada,et al.  Molecular testing of solid tumors. , 2011, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[51]  Philip Quirke,et al.  Accurately Identifying Low‐Allelic Fraction Variants in Single Samples with Next‐Generation Sequencing: Applications in Tumor Subclone Resolution , 2013, Human mutation.

[52]  P. Spellman,et al.  High quality copy number and genotype data from FFPE samples using Molecular Inversion Probe (MIP) microarrays , 2009, BMC Medical Genomics.

[53]  T. Walsh,et al.  PCR bias toward the wild-type k-ras and p53 sequences: implications for PCR detection of mutations and cancer diagnosis. , 1998, BioTechniques.

[54]  Chris Sander,et al.  Emerging landscape of oncogenic signatures across human cancers , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[55]  Alex M. Fichtenholtz,et al.  Development and validation of a clinical cancer genomic profiling test based on massively parallel DNA sequencing , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[56]  G. Weinstock,et al.  Direct selection of human genomic loci by microarray hybridization , 2007, Nature Methods.

[57]  David T. Okou,et al.  Microarray-based genomic selection for high-throughput resequencing , 2007, Nature Methods.

[58]  W. Kuo,et al.  High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays , 1998, Nature Genetics.

[59]  D. Fabris,et al.  Conversions of Formaldehyde-modified 2′-Deoxyadenosine 5′-Monophosphate in Conditions Modeling Formalin-fixed Tissue Dehydration , 2006, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[60]  P. Oefner,et al.  Characterization of the breast cancer associated ATM 7271T>G (V2424G) mutation by gene expression profiling , 2006, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[61]  P. Koivisto Aneuploidy and rapid cell proliferation in recurrent prostate cancers with androgen receptor gene amplification , 1997, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases.

[62]  George W. Sledge,et al.  A Multigene Expression Assay to Predict Local Recurrence Risk for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast , 2013, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[63]  Christopher A. Miller,et al.  VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing. , 2012, Genome research.

[64]  W. Holzgreve,et al.  Allele drop-out can occur in alleles differing by a single nucleotide and is not alleviated by preamplification or minor template increments. , 1998, Genetic testing.

[65]  M. Kastan,et al.  The ATM-dependent DNA damage signaling pathway. , 2005, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[66]  Derek Y. Chiang,et al.  High-resolution mapping of copy-number alterations with massively parallel sequencing , 2009, Nature Methods.

[67]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Chromosome 17 Aneusomy is Associated with Poor Prognostic Factors in Invasive Breast Carcinoma , 2004, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[68]  F. López-Ríos,et al.  A comparison of three methods for detecting KRAS mutations in formalin-fixed colorectal cancer specimens , 2012, British Journal of Cancer.

[69]  A. Whittemore,et al.  Population‐based estimates of breast cancer risks associated with ATM gene variants c.7271T>G and c.1066–6T>G (IVS10–6T>G) from the Breast Cancer Family Registry , 2006, Human mutation.

[70]  A. Sapino,et al.  Current Challenges for HER2 Testing in Diagnostic Pathology: State of the Art and Controversial Issues , 2013, Front. Oncol..

[71]  J. Schiffman,et al.  Molecular inversion probes: a novel microarray technology and its application in cancer research. , 2012, Cancer genetics.

[72]  M. Salto‐Tellez,et al.  Immunohistochemistry in the era of personalised medicine , 2012, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[73]  F. Nielsen,et al.  High-density SNP arrays improve detection of HER2 amplification and polyploidy in breast tumors , 2015, BMC Cancer.

[74]  Takahiro Kanagawa,et al.  Bias and artifacts in multitemplate polymerase chain reactions (PCR). , 2003, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[75]  Kristen Jepsen,et al.  Biased estimates of clonal evolution and subclonal heterogeneity can arise from PCR duplicates in deep sequencing experiments , 2014, Genome Biology.

[76]  F. Kokocinski,et al.  Development and validation of a next-generation sequencing-based protocol for 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening of embryos. , 2014, Fertility and sterility.

[77]  Elizabeth C. Chao,et al.  The Validation and Clinical Implementation of BRCAplus: A Comprehensive High-Risk Breast Cancer Diagnostic Assay , 2014, PloS one.