On the ontological status of the concept of risk

In this paper we review a set of frequently used risk definitions and analyze their ontological status, i.e. to what extent risk exists in itself independent of any specific assessor. According to some prevailing risk perspectives in the social sciences, risk exists as objective states of the world, but for other common risk perspectives the status of risk is not as clear, for example if risk is viewed as uncertainty about and severity of the consequences of an activity with respect to something that humans value. The principal aim of this paper is to contribute to a clarification of the issue in order to strengthen the foundations of the meaning of risk.

[1]  S. Campbell,et al.  Determining overall risk , 2005 .

[2]  Terje Aven,et al.  The Role of Quantitative Risk Assessments for Characterizing Risk and Uncertainty and Delineating Appropriate Risk Management Options, with Special Emphasis on Terrorism Risk , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[3]  Christian Kirchsteiger,et al.  International workshop on promotion of technical harmonisation on risk-based decision-making , 2002 .

[4]  Terje Aven,et al.  Response to Professor Eugene Rosa’s viewpoint to our paper , 2010 .

[5]  Terje Aven,et al.  Selective critique of risk assessments with recommendations for improving methodology and practise , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[6]  T. Aven,et al.  On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain , 2009 .

[7]  Nozer D. Singpurwalla,et al.  Reliability and risk , 2006 .

[8]  Henry H. Willis.  Guiding Resource Allocations Based on Terrorism Risk , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[9]  Terje Aven,et al.  On how to define, understand and describe risk , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[10]  D. Lindley.  The Philosophy of Statistics , 2000 .

[11]  T. Aven.  Misconceptions of Risk , 2010 .

[12]  Matthew Leitch,et al.  ISO 31000:2009—The New International Standard on Risk Management , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[13]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk: Contents , 2003 .

[14]  E. Rosa.  The Social Amplification of Risk: The logical structure of the social amplification of risk framework (SARF): Meta theoretical foundations and policy implications , 2003 .

[15]  E. Rosa.  Metatheoretical foundations for post-normal risk , 1998 .

[16]  Eugene A. Rosa,et al.  The logical status of risk – to burnish or to dull , 2010 .

[17]  S. Kaplan,et al.  On The Quantitative Definition of Risk , 1981 .

[18]  Terje Aven,et al.  On the new ISO guide on risk management terminology , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[19]  Vedat Verter,et al.  Railroad transportation of dangerous goods: Population exposure to airborne toxins , 2007, Comput. Oper. Res..

[20]  B.J.M Ale,et al.  Risk assessment practices in The Netherlands , 2002 .

[21]  Terje Aven,et al.  A unified framework for risk and vulnerability analysis covering both safety and security , 2007, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[22]  W. Lowrance,et al.  Of Acceptable Risk: Science and the Determination of Safety , 1976 .