Graph-Based Matching of Composite OWL-S Services

Existing techniques for Web service discovery focus mainly on matching functional parameters of atomic services, such as inputs and outputs. However, one of the main advantages of Web services is that they are often composed into more complex processes to achieve a given goal. Applying such techniques in these cases, ignores the workflow structure of the composite process, and therefore may produce matches that are not very accurate. To overcome this limitation, we propose in this paper a graph-based method for matching composite services, that are semantically described as OWL-S processes. We propose a graph representation of composite OWL-S processes and we introduce a matching algorithm that performs comparisons not only at the level of individual components but also at the structural level, taking into consideration the control flow among the atomic components. We also report our preliminary results of our experimental evaluation.

[1]  James A. Hendler,et al.  The Semantic Web — ISWC 2002 , 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[2]  Horst Bunke,et al.  A graph distance metric based on the maximal common subgraph , 1998, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[3]  Takahiro Kawamura,et al.  Semantic Matching of Web Services Capabilities , 2002, SEMWEB.

[4]  Dimitris Sacharidis,et al.  Ranking and Clustering Web Services Using Multicriteria Dominance Relationships , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Services Computing.

[5]  Umesh Bellur,et al.  Improved Matchmaking Algorithm for Semantic Web Services Based on Bipartite Graph Matching , 2007, IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS 2007).

[6]  Dimitrios Skoutas,et al.  A Ranking Mechanism for Semantic Web Service Discovery , 2007 .

[7]  Yi Chen,et al.  WISE: A Workflow Information Search Engine , 2009, 2009 IEEE 25th International Conference on Data Engineering.

[8]  R. Forthofer,et al.  Rank Correlation Methods , 1981 .

[9]  Ronald Fagin,et al.  Comparing top k lists , 2003, SODA '03.

[10]  Carole A. Goble,et al.  Workflow discovery: the problem, a case study from e-Science and a graph-based solution , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS'06).

[11]  Jorge S. Cardoso Discovering Semantic Web Services with and without a Common Ontology Commitment , 2006, 2006 IEEE Services Computing Workshops.

[12]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  A software framework for matchmaking based on semantic web technology , 2003, WWW '03.

[13]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Simlarity Search for Web Services , 2004, VLDB.

[14]  Matthias Klusch,et al.  Automated semantic web service discovery with OWLS-MX , 2006, AAMAS '06.

[15]  J. Munkres ALGORITHMS FOR THE ASSIGNMENT AND TRANSIORTATION tROBLEMS* , 1957 .

[16]  Yolanda Gil,et al.  Workflow matching using semantic metadata , 2009, K-CAP '09.

[17]  Jerry R. Hobbs,et al.  DAML-S: Semantic Markup for Web Services , 2001, SWWS.

[18]  Timos K. Sellis,et al.  A Ranking Mechanism for SemanticWeb Service Discovery , 2007, 2007 IEEE Congress on Services (Services 2007).

[19]  Matthias Klusch,et al.  WSMO-MX: A Logic Programming Based Hybrid Service Matchmaker , 2006, 2006 European Conference on Web Services (ECOWS'06).

[20]  Kaspar Riesen,et al.  Approximate graph edit distance computation by means of bipartite graph matching , 2009, Image Vis. Comput..