Comparison of observer performance on soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs: high resolution liquid-crystal display monitors versus cathode-ray tube monitors.

[1]  W. Pavlicek,et al.  Active matrix liquid crystal displays for clinical imaging: Comparison with cathode ray tube displays , 2000, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[2]  Thomas Mertelmeier,et al.  Why and how is soft copy reading possible in clinical practice? , 1999, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[3]  Peter Smeets,et al.  Image quality performance of liquid crystal display systems: influence of display resolution, magnification and window settings on contrast-detail detection. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[4]  M. Ikeda,et al.  The influence of liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors on observer performance for the detection of nodular lesions on chest radiographs , 2006, European Radiology.

[5]  Mathias Prokop,et al.  Detectability of catheters on bedside chest radiographs: comparison between liquid crystal display and high-resolution cathode-ray tube monitors. , 2005, Radiology.

[6]  M. Prokop,et al.  Comparison of liquid crystal versus cathode ray tube display for the detection of simulated chest lesions , 2005, European Radiology.

[7]  Jin Mo Goo,et al.  Effect of monitor luminance and ambient light on observer performance in soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs. , 2004, Radiology.

[8]  Katherine P. Andriole,et al.  SCAR R&D Symposium 2003: Comparing the Efficacy of 5-MP CRT Versus 3-MP LCD in the Evaluation of Interstitial Lung Disease , 2004, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[9]  Peter Homolka,et al.  Impact of ambient light and window settings on the detectability of catheters on soft-copy display of chest radiographs at bedside. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  Joon Beom Seo,et al.  Liquid-Crystal Display Monitors and Cathode-Ray Tube Monitors: A Comparison of Observer Performance in the Detection of Small Solitary Pulmonary Nodules , 2003, Korean journal of radiology.

[11]  Jiahua Fan,et al.  Characterization of high-resolution liquid crystal displays for medical images , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[12]  Elizabeth A. Krupinski,et al.  Evaluation of a flat CRT monitor for use in radiology , 2001, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[13]  C. Metz,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  Dd Dorfman,et al.  ROC rating analysis : generalization to the population of readers and cases with the jackknife method , 1992 .

[15]  K. Berbaum,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. , 1992, Investigative radiology.

[16]  J. Cameron,et al.  The influence of ambient and viewbox light upon visual detection of low-contrast targets in a radiograph. , 1982, Investigative radiology.

[17]  Hale Je,et al.  Identification of ampoules. , 1973 .