Vacuum versus sweeping gas operation for binary mixtures separation by dense membrane processes

When a gaseous phase takes place at the downstream side of a membrane separation process, two distinct options can be schematically operated in order to induce a driving force from that side: apply a lower pressure than the upstream one (thanks to a vacuum pump for instance), or exert a diluting effect by an inert gas sweep (under higher total downstream pressure conditions). The pros and cons of these two alternatives, particularly in terms of overall energy consumption, are often questioned, for instance for pervaporation applications where the first one (vacuum) is most often chosen but has never been systematically compared to the second one (sweeping gas). A simplified analysis of the above question is presented in this work. Based on a theoretical framework, which has been recently proposed, an easy to handle analytical solution to this problem is obtained. This expression enables the energy consumption under similar separation performances to be computed, providing that the permeabilities of the two compounds of the feed mixture remain constant. More specifically, it is shown that the energy consumption versus total downstream pressure curve shows invariably an asymmetrical bell shape with a maximum located at a fixed position. Operating conditions leading to minimal work of pumping will always be located at one of the two limits of the curve, that is to say either for low vacuum or high flowrate gas sweeping conditions. Nevertheless, taking into account the overall work of separation (i.e. the work needed for pure compounds recovery) clearly plays in favor of the vacuum operation.

[1]  Xianshe Feng,et al.  Liquid Separation by Membrane Pervaporation: A Review , 1997 .

[2]  E. Thompson,et al.  Dependence of diffusive permeation rates on upstream and downstream pressures , 1977 .

[3]  É. Favre Temperature polarization in pervaporation , 2003 .

[4]  Denis Roizard,et al.  Separation of binary mixtures by dense membrane processes: influence of inert gas entrance under variable downstream pressure conditions , 2003 .

[5]  Edward L Cussler,et al.  Hollow fiber air drying , 1992 .

[6]  Pervaporation with sweeping gas in polymeric hollow fiber membrane module Separation of alcohols from aqueous solution , 1994 .

[7]  J. G. Wijmans,et al.  The solution-diffusion model: a review , 1995 .

[8]  Q. Nguyen,et al.  Influence of downstream pressure on the pervaporation of water—tetrahydrofuran mixtures through a regenerated cellulose membrane (Cuprophan)☆ , 1986 .

[9]  G. Eigenberger,et al.  Vapour permeation for the recovery of organic solvents from waste air streams: separation capacities and process optimization , 1996 .

[10]  I. Souchon,et al.  Total permeate pressure influence on the selectivity of the pervaporation of aroma compounds , 1999 .

[11]  Ross Taylor,et al.  Multicomponent mass transfer , 1993 .

[12]  R. Field,et al.  Organophilic pervaporation: an engineering science analysis of component transport and the classification of behaviour with reference to the effect of permeate pressure , 2000 .

[13]  R. Baker Future directions of membrane gas separation technology , 2002 .