The Use of ICT for the Assessment of Key Competences

This report assesses current trends in the area of ICT for learning and assessment in view of their value for supporting the assessment of Key Competences. Based on an extensive review of the literature, it provides an overview of current ICT-enabled assessment practices, with a particular focus on more recent developments that support the holistic assessment of Key Competences for Lifelong Learning in Europe. The report presents a number of relevant cases, discusses the potential of emerging technologies, and addresses innovation and policy issues for eAssessment. It considers both summative and formative assessment and considers how ICT can lever the potential of more innovative assessment formats, such as peer-assessment and portfolio assessment and how more recent technological developments, such as Learning Analytics, could, in the future, foster assessment for learning. Reflecting on the use of the different ICT tools and services for each of the eight different Key Competences for Lifelong Learning it derives policy options for further exploiting the potential of ICT for competence-based assessment.

[1]  Mien Segers,et al.  The relationship between students’ perceptions of portfolio assessment practice and their approaches to learning , 2008 .

[2]  Knut Steinar Engelsen,et al.  Variations in portfolio assessment in higher education: Discussion of quality issues based on a Norwegian survey across institutions and disciplines , 2007 .

[3]  C. Paul Newhouse,et al.  Using IT to assess IT: Towards greater authenticity in summative performance assessment , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Pierpaolo Di Bitonto,et al.  An Adaptive Test for Learning Objects: item calibration , 2010, DMS.

[5]  G. Halász,et al.  Key Competences in Europe: Interpretation, Policy Formulation and Implementation. , 2011 .

[6]  Anne Gardner,et al.  Investigating the capacity of self and peer assessment activities to engage students and promote learning , 2010 .

[7]  John Hamer,et al.  Student use of the PeerWise system , 2008, ITiCSE.

[8]  El-Sayed M. El-Alfy,et al.  Construction and analysis of educational tests using abductive machine learning , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[9]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Cognitive Tutor: Applied research in mathematics education , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  Kirsti Ala-Mutka,et al.  Learning in Informal Online Networks and Communities , 2010 .

[11]  Jennifer L. Chiu,et al.  Teaching and Assessing Knowledge Integration in Science , 2006, Science.

[12]  ChangChi-Cheng,et al.  A comparative analysis of the consistency and difference among teacher-assessment, student self-assessment and peer-assessment in a Web-based portfolio assessment environment for high school students , 2012 .

[13]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[14]  Randy Elliot Bennett,et al.  Technological Issues for Computer-Based Assessment , 2012 .

[15]  M. F.,et al.  Bibliography , 1985, Experimental Gerontology.

[16]  Kwangsu Cho,et al.  Self-monitoring support for learning to write , 2010, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[17]  Tom Benton,et al.  Designing a formative e‐assessment: Latent class analysis of early reading skills , 2011 .

[18]  Stanislav Y. Ranguelov,et al.  Key Data on Learning and Innovation through ICT at School in Europe 2011. , 2011 .

[19]  Bill Blyth,et al.  Using Maple to implement eLearning integrated with computer aided assessment , 2009 .

[20]  Andreas Frey,et al.  Multidimensional adaptive testing in educational and psychological measurement: Current state and future challenges , 2009 .

[21]  Jenny Pange,et al.  The design of an expert system for the e-assessment and treatment plan of preschoolers’ speech and language disorders , 2010 .

[22]  S. Guerrero,et al.  Technology in Support of Middle Grade Mathematics: What Have We Learned?. , 2004 .

[23]  Patrick Griffin,et al.  Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills , 2011 .

[24]  Mitchell J. Nathan.  Technology Supports for Acquiring Mathematics , 2010 .

[25]  Ying-Chen Chen,et al.  Performance evaluation of an online argumentation learning assistance agent , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[26]  Rudolph Mitchell,et al.  Inquiry-Learning with WebLab: Undergraduate Attitudes and Experiences , 2007 .

[27]  Elliot Soloway,et al.  1: 1 Mobile Inquiry Learning Experience for Primary Science Students: a Study of Learning Effectiveness , 2011, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[28]  Jean Monnet,et al.  Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency , 2008 .

[29]  Eric Zhi-Feng Liu.  Developing a personal and group-based learning portfolio system , 2007, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[30]  Tamara M. Walser,et al.  An Action Research Study of Student Self-Assessment in Higher Education , 2009 .

[31]  Stephen W. Draper,et al.  Catalytic assessment: understanding how MCQs and EVS can foster deep learning , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[32]  Kurt Squire,et al.  Augmented Reality Simulations on Handheld Computers , 2007 .

[33]  Lei Chen,et al.  Assessment of non-native speech using vowel space characteristics , 2010, 2010 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop.

[34]  Yi-hsiu Lai,et al.  Which do students prefer to evaluate their essays: Peers or computer program , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[35]  R. E. Bennett.  Technology for Large-Scale Assessment , 2010 .

[36]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Transformational Play as a Curricular Scaffold: Using Videogames to Support Science Education , 2009 .

[37]  Lyndsay Grant,et al.  Social Software and Learning , 2005 .

[38]  J. B. Olsen,et al.  THE FOUR GENERATIONS OF COMPUTERIZED EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT , 1988 .

[39]  Eric Rosenbaum,et al.  On Location Learning: Authentic Applied Science with Networked Augmented Realities , 2007 .

[40]  Jakob Wandall,et al.  National Tests in Denmark--CAT as a Pedagogic Tool , 2011 .

[41]  Ismael Pascual-Nieto,et al.  Showing Automatically Generated Students' Conceptual Models to Students and Teachers , 2010, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[42]  Dougal Hutchison,et al.  An evaluation of computerised essay marking for national curriculum assessment in the UK for 11-year-olds , 2007, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[43]  Elena Barberà,et al.  Mutual feedback in e-portfolio assessment: an approach to the netfolio system , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[44]  Leslie R. Herrenkohl,et al.  Pedagogical Practices to Support Classroom Cultures of Scientific Inquiry , 2011 .

[45]  Harald Søndergaard,et al.  Learning from and with peers: the different roles of student peer reviewing , 2009, ITiCSE.

[46]  Chun-Yen Chang,et al.  Assessing Creative Problem-solving with Automated Text Grading , 2008 .

[47]  Yves Punie,et al.  The Future of Learning: Preparing for Change , 2012 .

[48]  William J. Gerace,et al.  Technology-Enhanced Formative Assessment: A Research-Based Pedagogy for Teaching Science with Classroom Response Technology , 2009 .

[49]  Anthony Anderson,et al.  Engaging first-year students through online collaborative assessments , 2010, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[50]  XiaoMing Cao,et al.  A Computer-Assisted Assessment and Diagnosis System for Arts Students-Oriented Computer Education , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Education Technology and Computer.

[51]  Jan-Willem Strijbos,et al.  Unravelling peer assessment: Methodological, functional, and conceptual developments , 2010 .

[52]  Lan Li,et al.  Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[53]  Karen Moss,et al.  Effective learning in science: The use of personal response systems with a wide range of audiences , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[54]  Caroline V. Gipps *.  What is the role for ICT‐based assessment in universities? , 2005 .

[55]  David Pepper,et al.  Assessing Key Competences across the Curriculum--And Europe. , 2011 .

[56]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  WISE Inquiry in Fifth Grade Biology , 2002 .

[57]  J. Meijer,et al.  Teaching and testing mathematical problem solving by offering optional assistance , 2002 .

[58]  Friedrich Scheuermann,et al.  Towards a Research Agenda on Computer-Based Assessment - Challenges and Needs for European Educational Measurement , 2008 .

[59]  George Hassapis,et al.  Assessment of the Reading Skill Improvement in the Computer-Assisted Teaching of a Foreign Language , 2001, Education and Information Technologies.

[60]  Peter Morris,et al.  Computer-aided Self-assessment and Independent Learning in Higher Education , 2011, CSEDU.

[61]  Graham Vickery,et al.  Participative Web And User-Created Content: Web 2.0 Wikis and Social Networking , 2007 .

[62]  Antonio Méndez-Vilas,et al.  Technology and learning , 2007 .

[63]  Alexander Robitzsch,et al.  ICT‐based dynamic assessment to reveal special education students’ potential in mathematics , 2010 .

[64]  David Birchfield,et al.  Mediated education in a creative arts context: research and practice at Whittier Elementary School , 2007, IDC.

[65]  Kari Smith,et al.  Portfolio appraisal: In search of criteria , 2007 .

[66]  Caroline V. Gipps,et al.  What is the role for ICT-based assessment in universities? , 2005 .

[67]  Patrick Onghena,et al.  An inventory of peer assessment diversity , 2011 .

[68]  P. Anderson.  What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education , 2007 .

[69]  Terry Ryan,et al.  Social ePortfolios as the new course management system , 2009 .

[70]  Larry Johnson,et al.  The 2011 Horizon Report. , 2011 .

[71]  D. Nunan,et al.  Technology Supports for Second Language Learning , 2010 .

[72]  Susi Peacock,et al.  Tutor response to implementing an ePortfolio to support learning and personal development in further and higher education institutions in Scotland , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[73]  Julie McLeod,et al.  Electronic portfolios: Perspectives of students, teachers and parents , 2008, Education and Information Technologies.

[74]  Eurydice.  Developing Key Competences at School in Europe Challenges and Opportunities for Policy , 2012 .

[75]  Jun-Ming Su,et al.  OPASS: An Online Portfolio Assessment and Diagnosis Scheme to Support Web-Based Scientific Inquiry Experiments. , 2011 .

[76]  Yves Punie,et al.  Creative Learning and Innovative Teaching: Final Report on the Study on Creativity and Innovation in Education in EU Member States , 2010 .

[77]  Cindy Brantmeier,et al.  Advanced L2 learners and reading placement: Self-assessment, CBT, and subsequent performance , 2006 .

[78]  Yasuyo Sawaki,et al.  Comparability of Conventional and Computerized Tests of Reading in a Second Language , 2001 .

[79]  Patricia A. Forster,et al.  Assessing technology-based approaches for teaching and learning mathematics , 2006 .

[80]  Anastasios A. Economides,et al.  Adaptive assessment of student's knowledge in programming courses , 2010, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[81]  Julio Olea,et al.  Estrategias de selección de ítems en un test adaptativo informatizado para la evaluación de inglés escrito , 2006 .

[82]  Jooyong Park,et al.  Constructive multiple-choice testing system , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[83]  Lesley Ljungdahl,et al.  Teachers’ Use of Diagnostic Testing to Enhance Students’ Literacy and Numeracy Learning , 2009 .

[84]  Chi-Cheng Chang,et al.  Using a Web-based portfolio assessment system to elevate project-based learning performances , 2011, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[85]  Patricia W. Cummins,et al.  Using Electronic Portfolios for Second Language Assessment , 2009 .

[86]  Romain Martin.  New Possibilities and Challenges for Assessment through the Use of Technology , 2008 .

[87]  Allan Collins,et al.  The second educational revolution: rethinking education in the age of technology , 2010, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[88]  T. de Jong,et al.  Technology supports for acquiring inquiry skills. , 2010 .

[89]  Heng-Tsung Danny Huang,et al.  Implementing electronic speaking portfolios: perceptions of EFL students , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[90]  Chenn-Jung Huang,et al.  Implementation and Performance Evaluation of an Intelligent Online Argumentation Assessment System , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Electrical and Control Engineering.

[91]  Mike Joy,et al.  Computer support of effective peer assessment in an undergraduate programming class , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[92]  Peter Mayer,et al.  Evaluating a web based intelligent tutoring system for mathematics at German lower secondary schools , 2008, Education and Information Technologies.

[93]  Fakhroddin Noorbehbahani,et al.  The automatic assessment of free text answers using a modified BLEU algorithm , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[94]  T. McMahon.  Peer feedback in an undergraduate programme: using action research to overcome students' reluctance to criticise , 2010 .

[95]  Chi-Cheng Chang,et al.  Use and performances of Web-based portfolio assessment , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[96]  Izaskun Ibabe,et al.  Online self-assessment with feedback and metacognitive knowledge , 2010 .

[97]  Hao Ni,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of Students' Learning Activity Based on Students' Electronic Portfolio of Web-Based Instruction System , 2009, 2009 First International Conference on Information Science and Engineering.

[98]  C. Dede.  Technological Supports for Acquiring Twenty-First-Century Skills , 2010 .

[99]  Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar,et al.  Reading and Technology , 2010 .

[100]  Claudia Olaciregui,et al.  The effects of a concept map-based information display in an electronic portfolio system on information processing and retention in a fifth-grade science class covering the Earth's atmosphere , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[101]  Alain Jaillet,et al.  Can Online Peer Assessment be Trusted? , 2009, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[102]  C. Reich.  Peer assessment. , 1985, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[103]  Herbert Kuchen,et al.  Computer-Supported Assessment of Software Verification Proofs - Towards High-Quality E-Assessments in Computer Science Education , 2010 .

[104]  C. MacArthur,et al.  Student revision with peer and expert reviewing , 2010 .

[105]  Kurt Squire,et al.  Environmental Detectives—the development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations , 2008 .

[106]  Dietmar F. Rösner,et al.  E-Assessment as a Service , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[107]  Sara Cushing Weigle.  Validation of automated scores of TOEFL iBT tasks against non-test indicators of writing ability , 2010 .

[108]  Liwen Chen,et al.  Improving student performance in a first-year geography course: Examining the importance of computer-assisted formative assessment , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[109]  Beryl Plimmer,et al.  StudySieve: a tool that supports constructive evaluation for free-response questions , 2010, CHINZ '10.

[110]  Bert P. M. Creemers,et al.  International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed.) , 2010 .

[111]  Kui Xie,et al.  Testing differential effects of computer-based, web-based and paper-based administration of questionnaire research instruments , 2007, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[112]  W. Lewis Johnson,et al.  Serious Use of a Serious Game for Language Learning , 2007, AIED.

[113]  Allan Collins,et al.  Technology Supports for Lifelong Learning , 2010 .

[114]  Jyh-Chong Liang,et al.  Learning through science writing via online peer assessment in a college biology course , 2010, Internet High. Educ..

[115]  David Rae,et al.  Enterprise Education in Schools and the role of Competency Frameworks , 2011 .

[116]  David Carless,et al.  Peer assessment in a test-dominated setting: empowering, boring or facilitating examination preparation? , 2010 .

[117]  Patrick Onghena,et al.  Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning , 2009 .

[118]  Matt Homer,et al.  Implicit aspects of paper and pencil mathematics assessment that come to light through the use of the computer , 2007 .

[119]  Gregory K. W. K. Chung,et al.  Developing High-Quality Assessments that Align with Instructional Video Games. CRESST Report 774. , 2010 .

[120]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  The Relationship Between Modality and Metacognition While Interacting with AutoTutor , 2009, AIED.

[121]  Sarah Osborne,et al.  Reaching Out with Role Models Role models and young people’s reading , 2010 .

[122]  Karin F. M. Vlug.  Because every pupil counts: the success of the pupil monitoring system in The Netherlands , 1998, Education and Information Technologies.

[123]  Sally E. Jordan,et al.  e-Assessment for learning? The potential of short-answer free-text questions with tailored feedback , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[124]  Chih-Ming Chen,et al.  Mobile formative assessment tool based on data mining techniques for supporting web-based learning , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[125]  Nomathamsanqa Tisani.  Challenges in producing a portfolio for assessment: in search of underpinning educational theories , 2008 .

[126]  BarchinoRoberto,et al.  An experiment for improving students performance in secondary and tertiary education by means of m-learning auto-assessment , 2010 .

[127]  Daniel T. Hickey,et al.  Enhancing Inquiry, Understanding, and Achievement in an Astronomy Multimedia Learning Environment , 2006 .

[128]  Juan Enrique Agudo,et al.  Personalization in Hypermedia Language Assessment , 2009, CSEDU.

[129]  Andrew Olney,et al.  GnuTutor: An Open Source Intelligent Tutoring System Based on AutoTutor , 2009, AAAI Fall Symposium: Cognitive and Metacognitive Educational Systems.

[130]  Hugo Van hamme,et al.  Developing a reading tutor: Design and evaluation of dedicated speech recognition and synthesis modules , 2009, Speech Commun..

[131]  Andrés Canga Alonso.  El portafolio como recurso para la reflexión y la autoevaluación en alumnos con dificultades de aprendizaje , 2011 .

[132]  Judith Watson,et al.  Does regular online testing enhance student learning in the numerical sciences? Robust evidence from a large data set , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[133]  Pascu Corina,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of the Creation, Use and Adoption of Social Computing Applications , 2008 .

[134]  Yao-Ting Sung,et al.  An Analysis of Peer Assessment Online Discussions within a Course that uses Project-based Learning , 2007, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[135]  Eda Üstünel,et al.  The effects of e-portfolio based assessment on students' perceptions of educational environment , 2010 .

[136]  Seiji Isotani,et al.  An algorithm for automatic checking of exercises in a dynamic geometry system: iGeom , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[137]  Charalampos Stergiopoulos,et al.  Comparison of oral examination and electronic examination using paired multiple-choice questions , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[138]  Beth Simon,et al.  Peerwise: replication study of a student-collaborative self-testing web service in a u.s. setting , 2010, SIGCSE.

[139]  Файл загружен,et al.  Digital Competence in Practice : An Analysis of Frameworks , 2012 .

[140]  M. Dziedzic,et al.  Assessment by peers - an effective learning technique , 2008, 2008 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference.

[141]  Anusca Ferrari,et al.  Creativity in Schools: A Survey of Teachers in Europe , 2010 .

[142]  Phil Davies.  Review and reward within the computerised peer‐assessment of essays , 2009 .

[143]  Frank Fischer,et al.  Commentary: Peer assessment as collaborative learning: A cognitive perspective , 2010 .

[144]  Darrall Thompson,et al.  Online self‐ and peer assessment for groupwork , 2009 .

[145]  Diane Ebert-May,et al.  Learner-Centered Inquiry in Undergraduate Biology: Positive Relationships with Long-Term Student Achievement , 2010, CBE life sciences education.

[146]  Leslie M Collins,et al.  Comparison of adaptive psychometric procedures motivated by the theory of optimal experiments: simulated and experimental results. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[147]  Joke Voogt,et al.  School and teacher factors associated with frequency of ICT use by mathematics teachers: Country comparisons , 2009, Education and Information Technologies.

[148]  Matthew Roberts,et al.  Students' response to traditional and computer-assisted formative feedback: A comparative case study , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[149]  Chi-Cheng Chang,et al.  A comparative analysis of the consistency and difference among teacher-assessment, student self-assessment and peer-assessment in a Web-based portfolio assessment environment for high school students , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[150]  Johannes Hartig,et al.  Multidimensional IRT models for the assessment of competencies , 2009 .

[151]  Julio Olea,et al.  [Item selection rules in a Computerized Adaptive Test for the assessment of written English]. , 2006, Psicothema.

[152]  Paul Costello.  A cost-effective classroom response system , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[153]  Daniel Livingstone,et al.  Multi-Modal Learning and Assessment in Second Life with quizHUD , 2009, 2009 Conference in Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications.

[154]  Kimberly Brown,et al.  Waterford Assessment of Core Skills - A Computerized Adaptive Reading Test for Pre-K through 2nd Grade , 2009, CSEDU.

[155]  Timothy Grant,et al.  Assessing and tracking students’ problem solving performances in anchored learning environments , 2009 .

[156]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Cohesion Relationships in Tutorial Dialogue as Predictors of Affective States , 2009, AIED.

[157]  İlke Büyükduman,et al.  Learning portfolio (LP) to enhance constructivism and student autonomy , 2010 .

[158]  Chi-Cheng Chang,et al.  Reliability and validity of Web-based portfolio peer assessment: A case study for a senior high school's students taking computer course , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[159]  Chris Beaumont,et al.  Evaluating the use of a wiki for collaborative learning , 2010 .

[160]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Operation ARIES!: A Computerized Game for Teaching Scientific Inquiry , 2009, AIED.

[161]  Christian Guetl,et al.  Supporting self-regulated learners with formative assessments using automatically created QTI-questions , 2011, 2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON).

[162]  Brian Doig,et al.  Mathematical power of special-needs pupils: An ICT-based dynamic assessment format to reveal weak pupils' learning potential , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[163]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  An auto-scoring mechanism for evaluating problem-solving ability in a web-based learning environment , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[164]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Changes in Reading Strategies as a Function of Reading Training: A Comparison of Live and Computerized Training , 2005 .

[165]  Jiyoon Lee,et al.  The effects of self-assessment among young learners of English , 2010 .

[166]  Zacharias C. Zacharia,et al.  Investigating Secondary School Students' Unmediated Peer Assessment Skills. , 2011 .

[167]  Chao-hsiu Chen,et al.  The implementation and evaluation of a mobile self- and peer-assessment system , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[168]  Nicole B. Ellison,et al.  Blogging in the Classroom: A Preliminary Exploration of Student Attitudes and Impact on Comprehension , 2008 .

[169]  Yun Xiao,et al.  The impact of two types of peer assessment on students' performance and satisfaction within a Wiki environment , 2008, Internet High. Educ..

[170]  Steve Joordens,et al.  Peering into large lectures: examining peer and expert mark agreement using peerScholar, an online peer assessment tool , 2008, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[171]  Randy Elliot Bennett,et al.  Does it Matter if I take My Writing Test on Computer? An Empirical Study of Mode Effects in NAEP , 2006 .

[172]  Jo Horne,et al.  Gender differences in computerised and conventional educational tests , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[173]  Cornelis A.W. Glas,et al.  Psychometric aspects of pupil monitoring systems , 2009 .

[174]  Anat Ben-Simon,et al.  Toward More Substantively Meaningful Automated Essay Scoring , 2007 .

[175]  Susan Bloxham,et al.  Learning to write in higher education: students’ perceptions of an intervention in developing understanding of assessment criteria , 2007 .

[176]  S. Freitas.  Learning in immersive worlds: A review of game-based learning , 2006 .

[177]  Vallipuram Muthukkumarasamy,et al.  Performance analysis of GAME: A generic automated marking environment , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[178]  Mansoor Tavakoli,et al.  The Impact Of Portfolio Assessment On Iranian EFL Students’ Essay Writing: A Process-Oriented Approach , 2010 .

[179]  Ilkka Tuomi,et al.  The Future of Learning in the Knowledge Society : Disruptive Changes for Europe by 2020 , 2006 .

[180]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Responding to Learners' Cognitive-Affective States with Supportive and Shakeup Dialogues , 2009, HCI.

[181]  David Little,et al.  Language learner autonomy and the European Language Portfolio: Two L2 English examples , 2009, Language Teaching.

[182]  William R. Penuel,et al.  Using Handheld Computers to Support Improved Classroom Assessment in Science: Results from a Field Trial , 2006 .

[183]  Silvia Baldiris,et al.  A Set of Software Tools to Build an Author Assessment Package on Moodle: Implementing the AEEA Proposal , 2010, 2010 10th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[184]  J. Fraillon,et al.  National assessment program: ICT literacy Years 6 and 10 , 2008 .

[185]  Patricia Cartney,et al.  Exploring the use of peer assessment as a vehicle for closing the gap between feedback given and feedback used , 2010 .

[186]  B. Means,et al.  An Overview of Technology and Learning , 2010 .

[187]  Sally E. Jordan,et al.  A comparison of human and computer marking of short free-text student responses , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[188]  Milan Tuba,et al.  Web-based testing and self-assessment system implemented with open technologies , 2010 .

[189]  Janet W. Looney.  Teaching, learning and assessment for adults : improving foundation skills , 2008 .

[190]  Gabriele Meiselwitz,et al.  Undergraduate fluency with information and communication technology: perceptions and reality , 2008, SIGITE '08.

[191]  Hidetoshi Saito,et al.  EFL classroom peer assessment: Training effects on rating and commenting , 2008 .

[192]  José Ramón Hilera,et al.  An experiment for improving students performance in secondary and tertiary education by means of m-learning auto-assessment , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[193]  Yves Punie,et al.  Innovation and creativity in education and training in the EU member states: fostering creative learning and supporting innovative teaching , 2009 .

[194]  G. Ocak,et al.  The views of students, teachers and parents and the use of portfolio at the primary level , 2009 .

[195]  Mária Bieliková,et al.  On the impact of adaptive test question selection for learning efficiency , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[196]  Michael Derntl,et al.  The student view on online peer reviews , 2009, ITiCSE.

[197]  Jian Cheng,et al.  Validating automated speaking tests , 2010 .

[198]  Christian D. Schunn,et al.  Students’ perceptions about peer assessment for writing: their origin and impact on revision work , 2011 .

[199]  Batool Mortazavi.  Self assessment surveillance using e-portfolio , 2010, The Second International Conference on E-Learning and E-Teaching (ICELET 2010).

[200]  Robert Burks,et al.  The Student Mathematics Portfolio: Value Added to Student Preparation? , 2010 .

[201]  Siu Cheung Hui,et al.  Automatic summary assessment for intelligent tutoring systems , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[202]  Knut Steinar Engelsen,et al.  Portfolio practices in higher education in Norway in an international perspective: macro‐, meso‐ and micro‐level influences , 2011 .