Governance in vulnerability assessment: the role of globalising decision-making networks in determining local vulnerability and adaptive capacity

Community-based vulnerability assessment has often assumed that the local is the relevant level of adaptation to climate change. This paper suggests that not only do a number of levels from the international to the regional influence which adaptations can take place locally, but the governance network that is made up by actors on different levels may to a large extent be formed in responses to globalising factors, such as internationalisation of economies and the changing role of the state. The paper presents a study of adaptation in reindeer (Rangifier tarandus) herding, forestry and fishing communities in northern Norway, Sweden, and Finland, with a focus on assessing stakeholders’ own perceptions of environmental, socio-political and economic factors that affect them. In general, the paper illustrates the integration of non-subsistence economies into large and complex interactions where local adaptation is a result of the sum of stresses impacting individual entrepreneurs, and the potential they have to adapt their practices given governance (and their access to support) on different scales.

[1]  Maria Tengö,et al.  Local Management Practices for Dealing with Change and Uncertainty: A Cross-scale Comparison of Cases in Sweden and Tanzania , 2004 .

[2]  O. W. Heal.  Global change in Europe's cold regions : report on the Arteri workshops held at the Danish Polar Centre, Copenhagen, from 8 to 10 November (Part 1) and 4 to 7 November (Part 2) 1996 , 1998 .

[3]  W. Adger,et al.  Adaptation to climate change in the context of sustainable development and equity , 2001 .

[4]  J. Kumpula.  Productivity of the semi-domesticated reindeer ( Rangifer t. tarandus L.) stock and carrying capacity of pastures in Finland during 1960-1990's , 2001 .

[5]  W. Adger,et al.  Theory and Practice in Assessing Vulnerability to Climate Change andFacilitating Adaptation , 2000 .

[6]  K.A. Hogda,et al.  Climatic change impact on growing season in Fennoscandia studied by a time series of NOAA AVHRR NDVI data , 2001, IGARSS 2001. Scanning the Present and Resolving the Future. Proceedings. IEEE 2001 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (Cat. No.01CH37217).

[7]  B. Smit,et al.  Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability , 2006 .

[8]  E. Ostrom,et al.  The globalization of socio-ecological systems: An agenda for scientific research , 2006 .

[9]  E. Mostert.  The challenge of public participation , 2003 .

[10]  Jesse H. Ausubel,et al.  Climate Impact Assessment , 1985 .

[11]  L. Hooghe,et al.  Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance , 2003, American Political Science Review.

[12]  Colin Polsky,et al.  Assessing vulnerabilities to the effects of global change: an eight step approach , 2005 .

[13]  W. Adger,et al.  Successful adaptation to climate change across scales , 2005 .

[14]  Örjan Pettersson.  Socio-economic dynamics in sparse regional structures , 2002 .

[15]  C. Aall,et al.  Data and processes linking vulnerability assessment to adaptation decision-making on climate change in Norway , 2006 .

[16]  Joseph Arvai,et al.  Economy, Politics and Institutions: From Adaptation to Adaptive Management in Climate Change , 2006 .

[17]  Michael Karcher,et al.  State of the Arctic Report. , 2006 .

[18]  R. Moss,et al.  The regional impacts of climate change : an assessment of vulnerability , 1997 .

[19]  H. Dowlatabadi,et al.  Multiple scales and regulatory gaps in environmental change: the case of salmon aquaculture , 2005 .

[20]  L. Scruggs,et al.  Where Have All the Members Gone? Globalization, Institutions, and Union Density , 2002, The Journal of Politics.

[21]  E. Carina H. Keskitalo,et al.  A framework for multi-level stakeholder studies in response to global change , 2004 .

[22]  Lars Otto Naess,et al.  Institutional adaptation to climate change: Flood responses at the municipal level in Norway , 2005 .

[23]  Robin M. Leichenko,et al.  Double exposure: assessing the impacts of climate change within the context of economic globalization , 2000 .

[24]  R. Corell,et al.  Saami reindeer pastoralism under climate change: Applying a generalized framework for vulnerability studies to a sub-arctic social–ecological system , 2007 .

[25]  L. Lebel,et al.  The Politics of Scale, Position, and Place in the Governance of Water Resources in the Mekong Region , 2005 .

[26]  James D. Ford,et al.  A Framework for Assessing the Vulnerability of Communities in the Canadian Arctic to Risks Associated with Climate Change , 2004 .

[27]  Richard J. T. Klein,et al.  An Anatomy of Adaptation to Climate Change and Variability , 2000 .

[28]  R. Kasperson,et al.  A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  A multi-channel stakeholder consultation process for transmission deregulation , 2003 .

[30]  Wil de Jong,et al.  Markets Drive the Specialization Strategies of Forest Peoples , 2004 .

[31]  John D. Donahue,et al.  Governance in a Globalizing World , 2000 .