Phase contrast and time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography of the intracerebral arteries at 1.5, 3 and 7 T.

PURPOSE Time-of-flight (ToF) and phase contrast (PC) magnetic resonance angiographies (MRAs) are noninvasive applications to depict the cerebral arteries. Both approaches can image the cerebral vasculature without the administration of intravenous contrast. Therefore, it is used in routine clinical evaluation of cerebrovascular diseases, e.g., aneurysm and arteriovenous malformations. However, subtle microvascular disease usually cannot be resolved with standard, clinical-field-strength MRA. The purpose of this study was to compare the ability of ToF and PC MRA to visualize the cerebral arteries at increasing field strengths. MATERIALS AND METHODS The Institutional Review Board-approved study included eight healthy volunteers (age: 36 ± 10 years; three female, five male). All subjects provided written informed consent. ToF and PC MRAs were obtained at 1.5, 3 and 7T. Signal intensities of the large, primary vessels of the Circle of Willis were measured, and signal-to-noise ratios were calculated. Visualization of smaller first- and second-order branch arteries of the Circle of Willis was also evaluated. RESULTS The results show that both ToF and PC MRAs allow the depiction of the large primary vessels of the Circle of Willis at all field strengths. Ultrahigh field (7T) provides only small increases in the signal-to-noise ratio in these primary vessels due to the smaller voxel size acquired. However, ultrahigh-field MRA provides better visualization of the first- and second-order branch arteries with both ToF and PC approaches. Therefore, ultrahigh-field MRA may become an important tool in future neuroradiology research and clinical care.

[1]  Clarice Maria Dall'agnol,et al.  Immediate adverse reactions to intravenous iodinated contrast media in computed tomography. , 2007, Revista latino-americana de enfermagem.

[2]  Francis Hui,et al.  Intracranial aneurysm detection with 3T magnetic resonance angiography. , 2007, Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore.

[3]  Stephen Balter,et al.  The new Joint Commission sentinel event pertaining to prolonged fluoroscopy. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[4]  D. Zagzag,et al.  Angiogenesis in Gliomas: Biology and Molecular Pathophysiology , 2005, Brain pathology.

[5]  P. Hofman,et al.  White Matter Lesions in Patients With Localization-Related Epilepsy , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[6]  A. Wilman,et al.  Vessel contrast at three Tesla in time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography of the intracranial and carotid arteries. , 2002, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[7]  J Huston,et al.  Magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla: initial clinical experience. , 2001, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[8]  Alireza Minagar,et al.  Multiple sclerosis as a vascular disease , 2006, Neurological research.

[9]  Johannes T Heverhagen,et al.  Noise measurement and estimation in MR imaging experiments. , 2007, Radiology.

[10]  J M Wardlaw,et al.  What is the most sensitive non-invasive imaging strategy for the diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms? , 2001, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[11]  Paul M. Parizel,et al.  MR angiography of the intracranial vessels: technical aspects and clinical applications , 2004, Neuroradiology.

[12]  N. Schuff,et al.  Pattern of cerebral hypoperfusion in Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment measured with arterial spin-labeling MR imaging: initial experience. , 2005, Radiology.

[13]  Keiichi Kikuchi,et al.  Diagnosis of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: 3T MR angiography versus 64-channel multi-detector row CT angiography. , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[14]  D F Kallmes,et al.  A Prospective Trial of 3T and 1.5T Time-of-Flight and Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography in the Follow-Up of Coiled Intracranial Aneurysms , 2010, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[15]  H H Quick,et al.  Evaluation of Intracranial Aneurysms with 7 T versus 1.5 T Time-of-Flight MR Angiography – Initial Experience , 2009, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[16]  Ihar Volkau,et al.  Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Angiography Scans on 1.5, 3, and 7 Tesla Units: A Quantitative Study of 3‐Dimensional Cerebrovasculature , 2013, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[17]  David Saloner,et al.  Intracranial time‐of‐flight MR angiography at 7T with comparison to 3T , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[18]  K. Jellinger,et al.  Prevalence and impact of cerebrovascular pathology in Alzheimer's disease and parkinsonism , 2006, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[19]  D Chien,et al.  Evaluation of cerebral aneurysms with high-resolution MR angiography using a section-interpolation technique: correlation with digital subtraction angiography. , 1999, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[20]  D. Turnbull,et al.  Molecular neuropathology of MELAS: level of heteroplasmy in individual neurones and evidence of extensive vascular involvement , 2006, Neuropathology and applied neurobiology.

[21]  H. Sakahara,et al.  Intravenous Injection of High and Medium Concentrations of Computed Tomography Contrast Media and Related Heat Sensation, Local Pain, and Adverse Reactions , 2005, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[22]  E. Larsson,et al.  Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: comparison of 3D inflow MRA at 3T and 1.5T and contrast-enhanced MRA at 3T with DSA , 2008, Neuroradiology.

[23]  A. Leffers,et al.  Neurologic Complications of Cerebral Angiography: A retrospective study of complication rate and patient risk factors , 2000, Acta radiologica.