Alternative Sources of Information and the Selection Decision Making Process

Personal information available on networking websites such as and Facebook © and LinkedIn © is being used more frequently in the workplace. This study examined the effect of alternative sources of information (i.e., information beyond that provided on a formal resume) on applicant evaluations and selection decision making. Alternative information was provided in a format similar to that utilized on social networking websites. Specifically, information was provided about job candidates’ alcohol consumption and gambling habits, information not typically found on resumes. It was hypothesized that evaluations of job candidates would be negatively influenced by the provision of negative information through a non resume source. The results indicated that alcohol consumption negatively affected evaluations of job candidates in five areas (likelihood of extending an interview invitation, assessment of qualifications, recommendation for hire, expected work performance, and expected work tenure). Gambling was found to negatively affect evaluations of job candidates in one area (expected work tenure), and the interaction between alcohol consumption and gambling was found to negatively affect evaluations of job candidates in three areas (assessment of qualifications, recommendation for hire, and expected work tenure). Consistent with the hypothesis, it appears that exposure to negative information through a non resume source negatively affected evaluations of job candidates.

[1]  Peg Thoms,et al.  Resume Characteristics as Predictors of an Invitation to Interview , 1999 .

[2]  M. Mumford,et al.  Biodata Handbook: Theory, Research, and Use of Biographical Information in Selection and Performance Prediction , 1994 .

[3]  Paul E. Barton How Many College Graduates Does the U.S. Labor Force Really Need? , 2008 .

[4]  Robert D. Gatewood,et al.  Human Resource Selection , 1997 .

[5]  Michael S. Cole,et al.  What can we uncover about applicants based on their resumes? A field study , 2003 .

[6]  A. Finder For Some, Online Persona Undermines a Résumé , 2006 .

[7]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Whose Space? Differences Among Users and Non-Users of Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[8]  K. Shelley The Future of Jobs for College Graduates. , 1992 .

[9]  Unfair discrimination in the employment interview. , 1989 .

[10]  D. Hecker Reconciling Conflicting Data on Jobs for College Graduates , 1992 .

[11]  Gail A. Fontenelle,et al.  Effects of Previewing the Application on Interview Process and Outcomes , 1984 .

[12]  Christopher J. L. Cunningham,et al.  Racial Identity as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Perceived Applicant Similarity and Hiring Decisions , 2009 .

[13]  Richard D. Arvey,et al.  Unfair discrimination in the employment interview: Legal and psychological aspects. , 1979 .

[14]  Michael A. Campion,et al.  Biodata phenomenology: Recruiters' perceptions and use of biographical information in resume screening. , 1994 .

[15]  Kevin L. Hutchinson,et al.  Personnel Administrators' Preferences for Résumé Content: Ten Years After , 1997 .