Microbiologic contamination of automatic injectors at MDCT: experimental and clinical investigations.

OBJECTIVE It is mandatory to teach antiseptic skills to staff who use contrast agent injectors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate in an experimental setting and in clinical routine the risk of microbiologic contamination of the syringes of injectors used to administer contrast agent and saline solution for MDCT. MATERIALS AND METHODS Microbiologic contamination of CT injector syringes over multiple uses for several injections was investigated in an experimental setup simulating the clinical setting. Each refill and injection operation was performed by the same technician, who processed a contrast agent for administration in a neighboring room as in clinical CT routine. Multiple administrations of nutritive medium and a chaser bolus were performed with the injection syringes. Simultaneously with each syringe replacement and filling operation, the filling and injection operation was simulated with a separate injection system under normal clinical conditions. Hygienic conditions in the CT department also were evaluated. For microbiologic analysis of devices and of palms of staff, imprints were obtained during clinical routine at the beginning of the study and at follow-up. Throughout the study, the staff participated in continuing education on hygienic behavior, such as hand disinfection and wearing of sterile gloves. In addition, clinical injector syringes were checked for microbiologic contamination. RESULTS In the experimental setup, the first four samples of each simulation experiment were sterile, and the subsequent probes were found to be contaminated with typical dermal bacteria, such as staphylococci. In the CT department, contamination with skin and oral flora was found on surfaces of devices and on palms. No imprint of surfaces or palms was contaminated with nosocomial or fecal pathogens. CONCLUSION Because even optimization of environments does not prevent contamination of syringes, multiple uses of syringes for more than one patient should be prohibited owing to the risk of septic complications.

[1]  A. Benzer,et al.  Bacterial contamination of anaesthetists' hands by personal mobile phone and fixed phone use in the operating theatre , 2007, Anaesthesia.

[2]  P. Böelle,et al.  Comparison of the antibacterial efficacy and acceptability of an alcohol-based hand rinse with two alcohol-based hand gels during routine patient care. , 2007, The Journal of hospital infection.

[3]  C. Nicolay,et al.  Hand hygiene: an evidence-based review for surgeons. , 2006, International journal of surgery.

[4]  G. Bukholm,et al.  Alcohol-based hand disinfection: a more robust hand-hygiene method in an intensive care unit. , 2005, The Journal of hospital infection.

[5]  B. Tombach,et al.  Injektionsautomaten in der Magnetresonanz- und Computertomographie: Pilotstudie zu hygienischen Aspekten , 2004 .

[6]  J. Katz Hand washing and hand disinfection: more than your mother taught you. , 2004, Anesthesiology clinics of North America.

[7]  P. Gastmeier,et al.  Bacterial contamination of multiple-dose vials: a prevalence study. , 2004, American journal of infection control.

[8]  W. Heindel,et al.  [Automatic injectors in magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography: pilot study on hygienic aspects]. , 2004, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[9]  A. van Belkum,et al.  Strict infection control measures do not prevent clonal spread of coagulase negative staphylococci colonizing central venous catheters in neutropenic hemato-oncologic patients. , 2003, FEMS immunology and medical microbiology.

[10]  J. Cleveland,et al.  Guidelines for infection control in dental health-care settings--2003. , 2003, MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports.

[11]  Dan M. Kluger,et al.  A Review of Risk Factors for Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection Caused by Percutaneously Inserted, Noncuffed Central Venous Catheters: Implications for Preventive Strategies , 2002, Medicine.

[12]  M. John,et al.  Hand hygiene: washing and disinfection. , 2000, Journal.

[13]  Robert Koch-Institut Anforderungen der Hygiene bei Operationen und anderen invasiven Eingriffen Mitteilung der Kommission für Krankenhaushygiene und Infektionsprävention am Robert-Koch-Institut , 2000, Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz.

[14]  D. Moro,et al.  Gadolinium-based MR contrast media: potential for growth of microbial contaminants when single vials are used for multiple patients. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  V. Taenzer,et al.  Risk of microbial contamination of iodinated contrast media on multiple use of large-volume bottles. , 1995, European journal of radiology.

[16]  B. Tress,et al.  Multiple doses of contrast medium from a single container: bacteriological studies. , 1994, Australasian radiology.

[17]  B. Tress,et al.  Bacteriological studies of open versus closed contrast medium delivery systems in angiography. , 1994, Australasian radiology.

[18]  S. Cherian,et al.  Bacterial contamination of contrast media stored after opening. , 1990, The British journal of radiology.