Downsizing and the emergence of self‐managed teams

This article explores the effects of downsizing and the subsequent emergence of self‐managed work teams. Continuous and accelerated change has resulted in massive downsizing activities by organizations. A classical model for the planning ‐ implementing ‐ and design of the downsizing process is presented. Group structure and typology is presented in terms of formal versus informal groups. The impact of groups and group dynamics, the stages of group development, and impact upon effectiveness, environment, design and learning processes will be included. Attention is given to the survivors of downsizing who form the foundation of the self‐managed team. Leadership demands are presented in terms of leading the survivors, ensuring commitment and managing the future. The emergence of the SMT in terms of productivity, expectations and the management of conflict complete this exhaustive review of empirical data required for action‐driven organizations in a turbulent environment.

[1]  Barbara T. Shapiro,et al.  The self‐directed team: A conflict resolution analysis , 1999 .

[2]  S. H. Appelbaum,et al.  The survivor syndrome: aftermath of downsizing , 1997 .

[3]  V. Marsick,et al.  Teams as Learners , 1997 .

[4]  Katharina Balazs,et al.  The Downside of Downsizing , 1997 .

[5]  G. Bohlander,et al.  How to get the most from team training , 1996 .

[6]  J. Dement.  Managers, leaders, and teams in a team-based environment. , 1996, Hospital materiel management quarterly.

[7]  S. H. Appelbaum,et al.  Self‐efficacy as a mediator of goal setting and performance , 1996 .

[8]  Michael A. West,et al.  Individual, Climate, and Group Interaction Processes as Predictors of Work Team Innovation , 1995 .

[9]  Steven H. Appelbaum,et al.  The Impact of Downsizing Practices on Corporate Success , 1994 .

[10]  Herbert F. Harback,et al.  Rightsizing: Building and maintaining strategic leadership and long-term competitiveness , 1994 .

[11]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Environmental and Organizational Context and Executive Team Structure , 1993 .

[12]  Thomas E. Becker,et al.  Profiles of commitment: An empirical test , 1993 .

[13]  J. Brockner.  Managing the Effects of Layoffs on Survivors , 1992 .

[14]  Aneil Mishra,et al.  Best practices in white-collar downsizing: managing contradictions , 1991 .

[15]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow , 1990 .

[16]  Lynn A. Isabella.  Downsizing: Survivors' assessments , 1989 .

[17]  Steven H. Appelbaum,et al.  The tough test of downsizing , 1987 .

[18]  John M. Ivancevich,et al.  Executive Actions For Managing Human Resources Before And After Acquisition , 1987 .

[19]  T. Wall,et al.  Outcomes of Autonomous Workgroups: A Long-Term Field Experiment , 1986 .

[20]  Dalmar Fisher,et al.  Communication in Organizations , 1981 .

[21]  James W. Bishop,et al.  How commitment affects team performance , 1997 .

[22]  R. Proehl.  Cross-functional teams: A panacea or just another headache , 1996 .

[23]  J. Quick,et al.  Organizational Behavior: Foundations, Realities and Challenges , 1994 .

[24]  Brian Dumaine,et al.  The Trouble with Teams. , 1994 .

[25]  Janis A. Cannon-Bowers,et al.  Work teams in industry: A selected review and proposed framework. , 1992 .

[26]  John R. Schermerhorn,et al.  Managing organizational behavior , 1982 .