Hard x-ray micro-tomography of a human head post-mortem as a gold standard to compare x-ray modalities

An entire human head obtained at autopsy was micro-CT scanned in a nano/micro-CT scanner in a 6-hour long session. Despite the size of the head, it could still be scanned with a pixel size of 70 μm. The aim of this study was to obtain an optimal quality 3D data-set to be used as baseline control in a larger study comparing the image quality of various cone beam CT systems currently used in dentistry. The image quality of the micro-CT scans was indeed better than the ones of the clinical imaging modalities, both with regard to noise and streak artifacts due to metal dental implants. Bony features in the jaws, like the trabecular architecture and the thin wall of the alveolar bone were clearly visible. Therefore, the 3D micro-CT data-set can be used as the gold standard for linear, angular, and volumetric measurements of anatomical features in and around the oral cavity when comparing clinical imaging modalities.

[1]  A. Constantinesco,et al.  Image quality evaluation of small FOV and large FOV CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology. , 2017, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[2]  Reinhilde Jacobs,et al.  Influence of scanning and reconstruction parameters on quality of three-dimensional surface models of the dental arches from cone beam computed tomography , 2009, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[3]  P. Galindo-Moreno,et al.  Comparison between microcomputed tomography and cone-beam computed tomography radiologic bone to assess atrophic posterior maxilla density and microarchitecture. , 2014, Clinical oral implants research.

[4]  Reinhilde Jacobs,et al.  Comparison of 6 cone-beam computed tomography systems for image quality and detection of simulated canine impaction-induced external root resorption in maxillary lateral incisors. , 2011, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[5]  F. Esmaeili,et al.  Beam Hardening Artifacts: Comparison between Two Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scanners , 2012, Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects.

[6]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  Normalized metal artifact reduction (NMAR) in computed tomography. , 2010, Medical physics.

[7]  M. Kortesniemi,et al.  Dental cone beam CT: A review. , 2015, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[8]  Jean Dumoncel,et al.  Comparison of the accuracy of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography and micro-computed tomography reconstructions by using different voxel sizes. , 2014, Journal of endodontics.

[9]  M Kortesniemi,et al.  Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners. , 2009, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[10]  S. Brooks,et al.  Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit. , 2003, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[11]  A. Farman,et al.  Maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography: essence, elements and steps to interpretation. , 2012, Australian dental journal.