Planar induction of convergence and extension of the neural plate by the organizer of Xenopus

This paper demonstrates that convergence and extension within the neural plate of Xenopus laevis are regulated by planar inductive interactions with the adjacent Spemann organizer. The companion article (Keller et al.: Developmental Dynamics 193:199–217, 1992) showed that the prospective hindbrain and spinal cord occupy a very short and very wide area just above the Spemann organizer in the early gastrula and that these regions converge and extend greatly during gastrulation and neurulation, using a sequence of radial and mediolateral cell intercalations. In this article, we show that “planar” contact of these regions with the organizer at their vegetal edge until stage 11 is sufficient to induce convergence and extension, after which their convergence and extension become autonomous. Grafts of the organizer in planar contact with uninduced ectodermal tissues induce these ectodermal tissues to converge and extend by a planar inductive signal from the organizer. Labeling of the inducing or responding tissues confirms that only planar interactions occur. Neural convergence and extension are actually hindered in explants deliberately constructed so that vertical interactions occur. These results show unambiguously that the Spemann organizer induces the extraordinary and precocious convergence and extension movements of the Xenopus neural plate by planar interactions acting over short distances.

[1]  J. Shih,et al.  The cellular basis of the convergence and extension of the Xenopus neural plate , 1992, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[2]  S. Mitani,et al.  Inductive differentiation of two neural lineages reconstituted in a microculture system from Xenopus early gastrula cells. , 1991, Development.

[3]  R. Keller.  Chapter 5 Early Embryonic Development of Xenopus laevis , 1991 .

[4]  J. Brockes,et al.  Monoclonal antibodies identify blastemal cells derived from dedifferentiating muscle in newt limb regeneration , 1984, Nature.

[5]  T. Jessell,et al.  Control of cell pattern in the developing nervous system: Polarizing activity of the floor plate and notochord , 1991, Cell.

[6]  R. Grainger,et al.  Homeogenetic neural induction in Xenopus. , 1991, Developmental Biology.

[7]  C. Phillips,et al.  Signals from the dorsal blastopore lip region during gastrulation bias the ectoderm toward a nonepidermal pathway of differentiation in Xenopus laevis. , 1989, Developmental biology.

[8]  J Hardin,et al.  The behaviour and function of bottle cells during gastrulation of Xenopus laevis. , 1988, Development.

[9]  A. Sater,et al.  Features of embryonic induction. , 1988, Development.

[10]  P. Tibbetts,et al.  Mediolateral cell intercalation in the dorsal, axial mesoderm of Xenopus laevis. , 1989, Developmental biology.

[11]  C. Phillips,et al.  Expression of Epi 1, an epidermis-specific marker in Xenopus laevis embryos, is specified prior to gastrulation. , 1988, Developmental biology.

[12]  R. Winklbauer.  Mesodermal cell migration during Xenopus gastrulation. , 1990, Developmental biology.

[13]  J. Braun,et al.  Improved fluorescent compounds for tracing cell lineage. , 1985, Developmental biology.

[14]  P Wigmore,et al.  Regeneration from isolated half limbs in the upper arm of the axolotl. , 1985, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[15]  R. Keller,et al.  Induction of neuronal differentiation by planar signals in Xenopus embryos , 1993, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[16]  J. Shih,et al.  Cell Motility, Control and Function of Convergence and Extension during Gastrulation in Xenopus , 1991 .

[17]  J. Faber,et al.  Normal Table of Xenopus Laevis (Daudin) , 1958 .

[18]  C. Kintner,et al.  Cellular contacts required for neural induction in Xenopus embryos: evidence for two signals. , 1989, Development.

[19]  D. Melton,et al.  Pre-existent pattern in Xenopus animal pole cells revealed by induction with activin , 1991, Nature.

[20]  J. Gurdon,et al.  The induction of anterior and posterior neural genes in Xenopus laevis. , 1990, Development.

[21]  J. Gurdon,et al.  A homeobox-containing marker of posterior neural differentiation shows the importance of predetermination in neural induction , 1987, Cell.

[22]  T. Jessell,et al.  Mesodermal control of neural cell identity: floor plate induction by the notochord. , 1990, Science.

[23]  J. Drukker,et al.  Effect of the notochord on proliferation and differentiation in the neural tube of the chick embryo. , 1989, Development.

[24]  N. K. Wessells,et al.  Expression of an epidermal antigen used to study tissue induction in the early Xenopus laevis embryo. , 1986, Science.

[25]  James C. Smith,et al.  Gastrulation movements provide an early marker of mesoderm induction in Xenopus laevis , 1987 .

[26]  G. Schoenwolf,et al.  Notochordal induction of cell wedging in the chick neural plate and its role in neural tube formation. , 1989, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[27]  T. E. Schroeder,et al.  Neurulation in Xenopus laevis. An analysis and model based upon light and electron microscopy. , 1970, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[28]  R. Keller,et al.  Regional expression, pattern and timing of convergence and extension during gastrulation of Xenopus laevis. , 1988, Development.

[29]  D. Melton,et al.  Expression of Xenopus N-CAM RNA in ectoderm is an early response to neural induction. , 1987, Development.