A MORF-Vision Method for Strategic Creation of IoT Solution Opportunities

ABSTRACT With the rise of Internet of Things (IoT), companies are now facing new challenges such as diverse consumer demands and shorter lifecycle of products and services. Even in big companies, they may have to “extract” new products every six months or less. Nonetheless, shorter lifecycle is never a waiver for poor user satisfaction. Common to the companies that survived such disruptive changes is that they emphasized the user experience (UX) as one of the most important elements of their strategy. This explains why most product innovation processes such as user-centered design or design thinking emphasize so much on “empathizing.” Developing a new product or service from scratch, however, is challenging especially when the underlying technology is new to people. The aim of this study is to develop a systematic process for creating opportunities from the UX perspective. This study suggests opportunity-creation process by adopting an “abductive” design thinking approach: (1) future envisioning and (2) opportunity identification and analysis. A new method called MORF-Vision (Morphological Future Envisioning) was developed to generate prospective scenarios that can be used in phase (2) to identify potential opportunities. An experiment showed that the MORF-Vision method is helpful to create opportunities in various business domains.

[1]  Ron Scott Stimulating Students' Design Creativity , 1990 .

[2]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Incremental and Radical Innovation: Design Research vs. Technology and Meaning Change , 2014, Design Issues.

[3]  Renee Wever,et al.  Practices of a "green" front end of innovation; A gateway to environmental innovation , 2010 .

[4]  Chih-Hsing Chu,et al.  One-Step QFD based 3D morphological charts for concept generation of product variant design , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[5]  Amy J. C. Trappey,et al.  A Review of Technology Standards and Patent Portfolios for Enabling Cyber-Physical Systems in Advanced Manufacturing , 2016, IEEE Access.

[6]  Roni Reiter-Palmon,et al.  The Effects of Type and Level of Personal Involvement on Information Search and Problem Solving , 2004 .

[7]  Robert L. Campbell,et al.  WILL THE REAL SCENARIO PLEASE STAND UP? , 1992, ACM SIGCHI Bull..

[8]  Hendrik N.J. Schifferstein,et al.  TOWARDS A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR EXPERIENCE-DRIVEN INNOVATION , 2012 .

[9]  S. Buisine,et al.  Generating prospective scenarios of use in innovation projects , 2014 .

[10]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Scenario-based design , 2002 .

[11]  Gerry Stahl,et al.  Group Creativity in Interaction: Collaborative Referencing, Remembering, and Bridging , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[12]  Jean-Marc Robert,et al.  What Is Prospective Ergonomics? A Reflection and a Position on the Future of Ergonomics , 2009, HCI.

[13]  Elizabeth Murphy,et al.  A user-centred approach to requirements elicitation in medical device development: a case study from an industry perspective. , 2012, Applied ergonomics.

[14]  A. Terry Bahill,et al.  A framework for the assessment of the creativity of product design teams , 2006 .

[15]  J. Jacko,et al.  The human-computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications , 2002 .

[16]  Ulrike de Brentani Innovative versus incremental new business services : Different keys for achieving success , 2001 .

[17]  Klaas Willems,et al.  Logical polysemy and variable verb valency , 2006 .

[18]  Daniel Justel,et al.  USE OF TOOLS , METHODS AND TECHNIQUES DURING THE FUZZY FRONT END OF INNOVATION : THEIR IMPACT ON INNOVATION PERFORMANCE – A SURVEY BASED EXPLORATORY STUDY OF COMPANIES IN THE BASQUE COUNTRY – , 2007 .

[19]  M. Hoegl,et al.  Organizational knowledge creation and the generation of new product ideas: A behavioral approach , 2008 .

[20]  Cornelius Herstatt,et al.  The Fuzzy Front End of Innovation , 2001 .

[21]  Gerald F. Smith Idea‐Generation Techniques: A Formulary of Active Ingredients , 1998 .

[22]  T. Lubart,et al.  Engineering students’ use of creativity and development tools in conceptual product design: What, when and how? , 2017 .

[23]  L CampbellRobert WILL THE REAL SCENARIO PLEASE STAND UP , 1992 .

[24]  Daniel Justel,et al.  Use of Tools, Methods and Techniques During the Fuzzy Front End of Innovation: Their Impact on Innovation Performance - An Exploratory Study of Companies in the Basque Country- , 2007 .

[25]  Jean G. Vaucher,et al.  A service creation environment based on scenarios , 1999, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[26]  Mikhail Turilin Radical innovation of user experience : how high tech companies create new categories of products , 2010 .

[27]  Roberto Verganti,et al.  Interpreting and envisioning — A hermeneutic framework to look at radical innovation of meanings , 2013 .

[28]  M. Mckelvey,et al.  Creating innovative opportunities through research collaboration: An evolutionary framework and empirical illustration in engineering , 2015 .

[29]  George Q. Huang,et al.  Web-based morphological charts for concept design in collaborative product development , 1999, J. Intell. Manuf..

[30]  Marco A. de Carvalho Effective New Product Ideation: IDEATRIZ Methodology , 2009, IFIP CAI.

[31]  G. R. Wheaton,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A TAXONOMY OF HUMAN PERFORMANCE: A REVIEW OF CLASSIFICATORY SYSTEMS RELATING TO TASKS AND PERFORMANCE , 1968 .

[32]  Klaus Pohl,et al.  Modelling Contextual Information about Scenarios , 1999 .

[33]  Cong Wang,et al.  Security and privacy mechanism for health internet of things , 2013 .

[34]  George Palaigeorgiou,et al.  Fictional characters in participatory design sessions: Introducing the "design alter egos" technique , 2010, Interact. Comput..

[35]  Shang Hwa Hsu,et al.  Developing a Scenario Database for Product Innovation , 2009, HCI.

[36]  Sung H. Han,et al.  A Design Process for a Customer Journey Map: A Case Study on Mobile Services , 2016 .

[37]  Yongli Zhao,et al.  Selection of PCEs' location in multi-domain optical networks , 2013 .

[38]  Joep W. Frens,et al.  Interaction relabelling and extreme characters: methods for exploring aesthetic interactions , 2000, DIS '00.

[39]  Johan Frishammar,et al.  From Preliminary Ideas to Corroborated Product Definitions: Managing the Front End of New Product Development , 2012 .

[40]  Fred E. Meyers Motion and Time Study: Improving Work Methods and Management , 1992 .

[41]  Peter R. Magnusson,et al.  Exploring the Contributions of Involving Ordinary Users in Ideation of Technology‐Based Services* , 2009 .

[42]  Peter C. Wright,et al.  Pastiche scenarios: Fiction as a resource for user centred design , 2006, Interact. Comput..

[43]  George A. Miller,et al.  WordNet: A Lexical Database for English , 1995, HLT.

[44]  James M. Higgins 101 Creative Problem Solving Techniques: The Handbook of New Ideas for Business , 1994 .

[45]  J F Suri,et al.  Scenario building as an ergonomics method in consumer product design. , 2000, Applied ergonomics.

[46]  K. Niwa,et al.  Pioneering Customer's Potential Task in Innovation: Separation of Idea-Generator and Concept-Planner in Front-End , 2006, 2006 Technology Management for the Global Future - PICMET 2006 Conference.

[47]  Jiyoung Kwahk,et al.  A methodology for evaluating the usability of audiovisual consumer electronic products. , 2002, Applied ergonomics.

[48]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products , 1990 .

[49]  Jaehyun Park,et al.  Developing and Verifying a Questionnaire for Evaluating User Value of a Mobile Device , 2015 .

[50]  Abbie Griffin,et al.  Serial Innovators' processes: How they overcome barriers to creating radical innovations , 2014 .

[51]  Sungjoo Lee,et al.  User‐Centric Service Map for Identifying New Service Opportunities from Potential Needs: A Case of App Store Applications , 2013 .

[52]  E. Garnsey,et al.  Opportunities for disruption , 2015 .

[53]  Steven A Lavender,et al.  Designing ergonomic interventions for EMS workers: concept generation of patient-handling devices. , 2008, Applied ergonomics.

[54]  Tapani Savolainen Expanding Human-Computer Interaction by Computer-Aided Creativity , 1990, Interact. Comput..

[55]  Lee Skrypchuk,et al.  Steering the conversation: A linguistic exploration of natural language interactions with a digital assistant during simulated driving. , 2017, Applied ergonomics.

[56]  Antonie J. Jetter,et al.  Educating the guess: strategies, concepts and tools for the fuzzy front end of product development , 2003, PICMET '03: Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology Technology Management for Reshaping the World, 2003..

[57]  Lene Nielsen,et al.  From user to character: an investigation into user-descriptions in scenarios , 2002, DIS '02.

[58]  Dan Gruen,et al.  The Use of Stories in User Experience Design , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[59]  David Wallace,et al.  Assessing the quality of ideas from prolific, early-stage product ideation , 2013 .

[60]  L. Egri,et al.  The Art Of Dramatic Writing: Its Basis In The Creative Interpretation Of Human Motives , 1946 .

[61]  David Wilemon,et al.  Focusing the Fuzzy Front-End in New Product Development , 2002 .

[62]  Bill Nicholl,et al.  The contribution of product analysis to fixation in students’ design and technology work , 2007 .

[63]  Andreas Riel,et al.  Structuring the early fuzzy front-end to manage ideation for new product development , 2013 .

[64]  Roger L. Firestien,et al.  A Review of the Effectiveness of CPS Training: A Focus on Workplace Issues , 2006 .

[65]  Susan E. Reid,et al.  The Fuzzy Front End of New Product Development for Discontinuous Innovations: A Theoretical Model , 2004 .

[66]  Anna Rumshisky,et al.  Resolving polysemy in verbs: Contextualized distributional approach to argument semantics , 2008 .

[67]  Shailey Minocha,et al.  A co-operative scenario based approach to acquisition and validation of system requirements: How exceptions can help! , 1999, Interact. Comput..

[68]  Heekyung Moon,et al.  A creative idea generation methodology by future envisioning from the user experience perspective , 2016 .