Listening to Save Wildlife: Lessons Learnt from Use of Acoustic Technology by a Species Recovery Team

An increasing variety of technologies are being developed to support conservation of endangered wildlife; however, comparatively little attention has been devoted to their design. We undertook three years of ethnographic fieldwork and design research with the recovery team of an endangered Australian bird (the Eastern bristlebird) to explore the team's culture and practices, as well as their perspectives on including collection and analysis of environmental acoustic recordings into their conservation praxis. Through thematic analysis, we identified the team's collective goals, culture, conservation activities, and technology use. We found that acoustic technologies have promise for supporting conservation of furtive and vocal Eastern bristlebirds. Trialing acoustic technologies also revealed that the team had strong interest in their use. We identified knowledge gaps, time constraints, and technology aversion as barriers to be overcome with future interaction design research. We offer an initial set of practical guidelines for designing technologies to support conservation.

[1]  Margot Brereton,et al.  Virtual birding: extending an environmental pastime into the virtual world for citizen science , 2013, CHI.

[2]  Margarita Mulero-Pázmány,et al.  Drones for Conservation in Protected Areas: Present and Future , 2019, Drones.

[3]  Stephen A. Murphy,et al.  Understanding and managing the threats to Night Parrots in south-western Queensland , 2018 .

[4]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Designing for dabblers and deterring drop-outs in citizen science , 2014, CHI.

[5]  Robert Planqué,et al.  The Xeno-canto Collection and its Relation to Sound Recognition and Classification , 2015, CLEF.

[6]  Damien A. Fordham,et al.  Life history and spatial traits predict extinction risk due to climate change , 2014 .

[7]  Laura Fraser,et al.  Motivations and Benefits of Citizen Scientists Engaged in Purple Martin Migration Research , 2014 .

[8]  Richard A. Fuller,et al.  Where to draw the line? Using movement data to inform protected area design and conserve mobile species , 2019, Biological Conservation.

[9]  Raymond R. Carthy,et al.  The potential of unmanned aerial systems for sea turtle research and conservation: A review and future directions , 2017 .

[10]  Gerald L. Kooyman,et al.  An Emperor Penguin Population Estimate: The First Global, Synoptic Survey of a Species from Space , 2012, PloS one.

[11]  D. Jorgensen Participant Observation: A Methodology for Human Studies , 1989 .

[12]  Oded Nov,et al.  Investigating the Motivational Paths of Peer Production Newcomers , 2017, CHI.

[13]  Paul Roe,et al.  Catching Toad Calls in the Cloud: Commodity Edge Computing for Flexible Analysis of Big Sound Data , 2018, 2018 IEEE 14th International Conference on e-Science (e-Science).

[14]  W. Teepe,et al.  Protocol Analysis , 2012 .

[15]  Margot Brereton,et al.  Calls from the Wild: Engaging Citizen Scientist with Animal Sounds , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[16]  Paul Roe,et al.  Towards an Acoustic Environmental Observatory , 2008, 2008 IEEE Fourth International Conference on eScience.

[17]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  From Conservation to Crowdsourcing: A Typology of Citizen Science , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[18]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Designing for homo ludens , 2002 .

[19]  Hervé Glotin,et al.  Automatic acoustic detection of birds through deep learning: The first Bird Audio Detection challenge , 2018, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[20]  Sara C Keen,et al.  Automated detection of low-frequency rumbles of forest elephants: A critical tool for their conservation. , 2017, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Kristine F. Stepenuck,et al.  Citizen science can improve conservation science, natural resource management, and environmental protection , 2017 .

[22]  R. Kays,et al.  Emerging Technologies to Conserve Biodiversity. , 2015, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[23]  Derek L. Hansen,et al.  Motivations Affecting Initial and Long-Term Participation in Citizen Science Projects in Three Countries , 2014 .

[24]  Oded Nov,et al.  Crowdsourcing Multi-label Audio Annotation Tasks with Citizen Scientists , 2019, CHI.

[25]  L. Joppa Technology for nature conservation: An industry perspective , 2015, Ambio.

[26]  Fabio Remondino,et al.  Preface: Latest Developments, Methodologies, and Applications Based on UAV Platforms , 2019, Drones.

[27]  Martine Maron,et al.  Grassy patch size and structure are important for northern Eastern Bristlebird persistence in a dynamic ecosystem , 2018 .

[28]  Wonjung Kim,et al.  Zaturi: We Put Together the 25th Hour for You. Create a Book for Your Baby , 2017, CSCW.

[29]  David C. Douglas,et al.  Contrasting extreme long-distance migration patterns in bar-tailed godwits Limosa lapponica , 2012 .

[30]  W. Turner Sensing biodiversity , 2014, Science.

[31]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Being in the thick of in-the-wild studies: the challenges and insights of researcher participation , 2012, CHI.

[32]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects , 2012, CSCW.

[33]  Margot Brereton,et al.  Visualisations elicit knowledge to refine citizen science technology design: spectrograms resonate with birders , 2018, OZCHI.

[34]  Stephen Marsland,et al.  Automated birdsong recognition in complex acoustic environments: a review , 2018 .

[35]  Helena Karasti,et al.  Enriching the Notion of Data Curation in E-Science: Data Managing and Information Infrastructuring in the Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network , 2006, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[36]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Listening to the forest and its curators: lessons learnt from a bioacoustic smartphone application deployment , 2014, CHI.

[37]  Kate E. Jones,et al.  Emerging opportunities and challenges for passive acoustics in ecological assessment and monitoring , 2018, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[38]  Anita Greenhill,et al.  Defining and Measuring Success in Online Citizen Science: A Case Study of Zooniverse Projects , 2015, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[39]  Alessandro Soro,et al.  The Ambient Birdhouse: An IoT Device to Discover Birds and Engage with Nature , 2018, CHI.

[40]  Alex Rogers,et al.  AudioMoth: Evaluation of a smart open acoustic device for monitoring biodiversity and the environment , 2018 .

[41]  Yang Song,et al.  The iNaturalist Species Classification and Detection Dataset , 2017, 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[42]  Margot Brereton,et al.  Collaborative Exploration and Sensemaking of Big Environmental Sound Data , 2017, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[43]  Daniela Petrelli,et al.  Sonic souvenirs: exploring the paradoxes of recorded sound for family remembering , 2010, CSCW '10.

[44]  Margot Brereton,et al.  Some Notes on the Design of "World Machines" , 2015, OZCHI.

[45]  Anne Marie Piper,et al.  Audio-enhanced paper photos: encouraging social interaction at age 105 , 2013, CSCW.

[46]  Jorge A. Ahumada,et al.  Monitoring the Status and Trends of Tropical Forest Terrestrial Vertebrate Communities from Camera Trap Data: A Tool for Conservation , 2013, PloS one.

[47]  Robert J. Anderson,et al.  Representations and Requirements: The Value of Ethnography in System Design , 1994, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[48]  M. Maron,et al.  Patterns of invertebrate food availability and the persistence of an avian insectivore on the brink , 2019, Austral Ecology.

[49]  David C. Douglas,et al.  Extreme endurance flights by landbirds crossing the Pacific Ocean: ecological corridor rather than barrier? , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[50]  Margot Brereton,et al.  Visualizing five decades of environmental acoustic data , 2018, 2018 IEEE 14th International Conference on e-Science (e-Science).

[51]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  How two billion smartphone users can save species! , 2017, Interactions.

[52]  J. Lahoz‐Monfort,et al.  Conservation technology: The next generation , 2018 .

[53]  David M Watson,et al.  Ethical birding call playback and conservation , 2019, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[54]  R. Bonney,et al.  Citizen Science as a Tool for Conservation in Residential Ecosystems , 2007 .

[55]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[56]  Eske Willerslev,et al.  Detection of a Diverse Marine Fish Fauna Using Environmental DNA from Seawater Samples , 2012, PloS one.

[57]  Adrian Boyle,et al.  A nesting record and vocalisations of the Night Parrot Pezoporus occidentalis from the East Murchison, Western Australia , 2017 .

[58]  Hill Hiroki Kobayashi,et al.  Utilizing the Cyberforest live sound system with social media to remotely conduct woodland bird censuses in Central Japan , 2015, Ambio.

[59]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Citizen Science: New Research Challenges for Human–Computer Interaction , 2016, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[60]  Michael W. Towsey,et al.  Visualization of Long-duration Acoustic Recordings of the Environment , 2014, ICCS.