2.5-D/3-D resistivity modelling in anisotropic media using Gaussian quadrature grids

SUMMARY We present a new numerical scheme for 2.5-D/3-D direct current resistivity modelling in heterogeneous, anisotropic media. This method, named the ‘Gaussian quadrature grid’ (GQG) method, cooperatively combines the solution of the Variational Principle of the partial differential equation, Gaussian quadrature abscissae and local cardinal functions so that it has the main advantages of the spectral element method. The formulation shows that the GQG method is a modification of the spectral element method but does not employ the constant elements or require the mesh generator to match the Earth's surface. This makes it much easier to deal with geological models having a 2-D/3-D complex topography than using traditional numerical methods. The GQG technique can achieve a similar convergence rate to the spectral element method. We show it transforms the 2.5-D/3-D resistivity modelling problem into a sparse and symmetric linear equation system that can be solved by an iterative or matrix inversion method. Comparison with analytic solutions for homogeneous isotropic and anisotropic models shows that the error depends on the Gaussian quadrature order (abscissa number) and the subdomain size. The higher the order or the smaller the subdomain size that is employed, the more accurate are the results obtained. Several other synthetic examples, both homogeneous and inhomogeneous, incorporating sloping, undulating and severe topography, are presented and found to yield results comparable to finite element solutions involving a dense mesh.

[1]  G. M. Habberjam THE EFFECTS OF ANISOTROPY ON SQUARE ARRAY RESISTIVITY MEASUREMENTS , 1972 .

[2]  Peter N. Shive,et al.  Singularity removal: A refinement of resistivity modeling techniques , 1989 .

[3]  Gerald W. Hohmann,et al.  Topographic effects in resistivity and induced-polarization surveys , 1980 .

[4]  D. Kershaw The incomplete Cholesky—conjugate gradient method for the iterative solution of systems of linear equations , 1978 .

[5]  H. Saunders,et al.  Finite Elements—A Second Course (Vol. II) , 1987 .

[6]  W. Daily,et al.  The effects of noise on Occam's inversion of resistivity tomography data , 1996 .

[7]  L. Trefethen Spectral Methods in MATLAB , 2000 .

[8]  Michael W. Asten The Influence of Electrical Anisotropy on Mise a la Masse Surveys , 1974 .

[9]  Irshad R. Mufti,et al.  FINITE‐DIFFERENCE RESISTIVITY MODELING FOR ARBITRARILY SHAPED TWO‐DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURES , 1976 .

[10]  Matthew J. Yedlin,et al.  Some refinements on the finite-difference method for 3-D dc resistivity modeling , 1996 .

[11]  J. Oden Finite Elements: A Second Course , 1983 .

[12]  U. Das,et al.  RESISTIVITY AND INDUCED POLARIZATION RESPONSES OF ARBITRARILY SHAPED 3‐D BODIES IN A TWO‐LAYERED EARTH* , 1987 .

[13]  B. James Efficient microcomputer-based finite-difference resistivity modeling via Polozhii decomposition , 1985 .

[14]  T. Lee An Integral Equation and its Solution for some Two- and Three-Dimensional Problems in Resistivity and Induced Polarization , 2007 .

[15]  Jonathan Richard Shewchuk,et al.  Delaunay refinement algorithms for triangular mesh generation , 2002, Comput. Geom..

[16]  M. Hvožďara,et al.  An integral equations solution of the forward D.C. geoelectric problem for a 3-D body of inhomogeneous conductivity buried in a halfspace , 1998 .

[17]  Zdeněk Martinec,et al.  Spectral–finite element approach to three‐dimensional electromagnetic induction in a spherical earth , 1999 .

[18]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in Fortran 90: the art of parallel scientific computing, 2nd Edition , 1996, Fortran numerical recipes.

[19]  Analytical solution for the electric potential in arbitrary anisotropic layered media applying the set of Hankel transforms of integer order , 2006 .

[20]  Z. Bing,et al.  Finite element three-dimensional direct current resistivity modelling: accuracy and efficiency considerations , 2001 .

[21]  T. Günther,et al.  Three‐dimensional modelling and inversion of dc resistivity data incorporating topography – II. Inversion , 2006 .

[22]  M. Papadrakakis,et al.  Improving the efficiency of incomplete Choleski preconditionings , 1991 .

[23]  Benchun Duan,et al.  Selection of the wavenumbers k using an optimization method for the inverse Fourier transform in 2.5D electrical modelling , 2000 .

[24]  A. Dey,et al.  Resistivity modeling for arbitrarily shaped three-dimensional structures , 1979 .

[25]  E. Mundry GEOELECTRICAL MODEL CALCULATIONS FOR TWO‐DIMENSIONAL RESISTIVITY DISTRIBUTIONS* , 1984 .

[26]  K. Spitzer A 3-D FINITE-DIFFERENCE ALGORITHM FOR DC RESISTIVITY MODELLING USING CONJUGATE GRADIENT METHODS , 1995 .

[27]  J. Coggon Electromagnetic and electrical modeling by the finite element method , 1971 .

[28]  Alex Marcuello,et al.  2-D resistivity modeling; an approach to arrays parallel to the strike direction , 1991 .

[29]  H. T. Holcombe,et al.  Three-dimensional terrain corrections in resistivity surveys , 1984 .

[30]  Jie Zhang,et al.  3-D resistivity forward modeling and inversion using conjugate gradients , 1995 .

[31]  Christopher C. Pain,et al.  Anisotropic resistivity inversion , 2003 .

[32]  M. A. Ajiz,et al.  A robust incomplete Choleski‐conjugate gradient algorithm , 1984 .

[33]  A. Bruaset A survey of preconditioned iterative methods , 1995 .

[34]  M. Loke Topographic Modelling in Electrical Imaging Inversion , 2000 .

[35]  C. Yin,et al.  Geoelectrical fields in a layered earth with arbitrary anisotropy , 1999 .

[36]  Chester J. Weiss,et al.  Adaptive finite-element modeling using unstructured grids: The 2D magnetotelluric example , 2005 .

[37]  A. Dey,et al.  Resistivity modelling for arbitrarily shaped two-dimensional structures , 1979 .

[38]  D. Komatitsch,et al.  Introduction to the spectral element method for three-dimensional seismic wave propagation , 1999 .

[39]  Klaus Spitzer,et al.  Finite element resistivity modelling for three-dimensional structures with arbitrary anisotropy , 2005 .

[40]  Zhou Bing,et al.  Cross‐hole resistivity tomography using different electrode configurations , 2000 .

[41]  R. Mackie,et al.  3‐D resistivity forward modeling and inversion using conjugate gradients , 1994 .

[42]  G. W. Hohmann,et al.  An investigation of finite-element modeling for electrical and electromagnetic data in three dimensions , 1981 .