Pupil diameter tracks changes in control state predicted by the adaptive gain theory of locus coeruleus function

An important dimension of cognitive control is the adaptive regulation of the balance between exploitation (pursuing known sources of reward) and exploration (seeking new ones) in response to changes in task utility. Recent studies have suggested that the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system may play an important role in this function and that pupil diameter can be used to index locus coeruleus activity. On the basis of this, we reasoned that pupil diameter may correlate closely with control state and associated changes in behavior. Specifically, we predicted that increases in baseline pupil diameter would be associated with decreases in task utility and disengagement from the task (exploration), whereas reduced baseline diameter (but increases in task-evoked dilations) would be associated with task engagement (exploitation). Findings in three experiments were consistent with these predictions, suggesting that pupillometry may be useful as an index of both control state and, indirectly, locus coeruleus function.

[1]  R. Yerkes,et al.  The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit‐formation , 1908 .

[2]  S. B. Vincent.  The function of the vibrissae in the behavior of the white rat , 1912 .

[3]  D. Wolfle.  Across the Secretary's Desk: National Science Foundation. , 1947 .

[4]  J. Lacey,et al.  THE EVALUATION OF AUTONOMIC RESPONSES: TOWARD A GENERAL SOLUTION , 1956, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Cyril M. Harris,et al.  Handbook of Noise Control , 1957 .

[6]  E. Duffy,et al.  The psychological significance of the concept of arousal or activation. , 1957, Psychological review.

[7]  J. Easterbrook.  The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. , 1959, Psychological review.

[8]  J. Beatty,et al.  Pupillary responses in a pitch-discrimination task , 1967 .

[9]  D. Kahneman.  An onset-onset law for one case of apparent motion and metacontrast , 1967 .

[10]  M. Jouvet,et al.  Biogenic amines and the states of sleep. , 1969, Science.

[11]  J. Bradshaw.  Background light intensity and the pupillary response in a reaction time task , 1969 .

[12]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[13]  G K Poock,et al.  Information processing vs pupil diameter. , 1973, Perceptual and motor skills.

[14]  J A Hobson,et al.  Sleep cycle oscillation: reciprocal discharge by two brainstem neuronal groups. , 1975, Science.

[15]  K. Pribram,et al.  Arousal, activation, and effort in the control of attention. , 1975, Psychological review.

[16]  E. Hess,et al.  Pupillometry: The Psychology of the Pupillary Response , 1978 .

[17]  Pat Levitt,et al.  Origin and organization of brainstem catecholamine innervation in the rat , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[18]  R. Ratcliff.  Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  F. Bloom,et al.  Impulse activity of locus coeruleus neurons in awake rats and monkeys is a function of sensory stimulation and arousal. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  D. Landers,et al.  The arousal-performance relationship revisited. , 1980, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[21]  R. Zajonc.  Feeling and thinking : Preferences need no inferences , 1980 .

[22]  A. Loewy,et al.  Efferent connections of the ventral medulla oblongata in the rat , 1981, Brain Research Reviews.

[23]  S. Steinhauer,et al.  VULNERABILITY TO SCHIZOPHRENIA: INFORMATION PROCESSING IN THE PUPIL AND EVENT-RELATED POTENTIAL , 1982 .

[24]  J. Beatty,et al.  Phasic not tonic pupillary responses vary with auditory vigilance performance. , 1982, Psychophysiology.

[25]  J. Beatty.  Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. , 1982, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  S. Hilton,et al.  Ventral medullary neurones excited from the hypothalamic and mid-brain defence areas. , 1984, Journal of the autonomic nervous system.

[27]  Floyd E. Bloom,et al.  Anatomy and physiology of locus coeruleus neurons: functional implications , 1984 .

[28]  Gary Aston-Jones,et al.  Behavioral functions of locus coeruleus derived from cellular attributes , 1985 .

[29]  M. Elam,et al.  Locus coeruleus neurons and sympathetic nerves: Activation by cutaneous sensory afferents , 1986, Brain Research.

[30]  W. T. Nickell,et al.  The brain nucleus locus coeruleus: restricted afferent control of a broad efferent network. , 1986, Science.

[31]  J. Beatty,et al.  Contrasting effects of response uncertainty on the task-evoked pupillary response and reaction time. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[32]  R. Neiss.  Reconceptualizing arousal: psychobiological states in motor performance. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  G. Aston-Jones,et al.  Diverse afferents converge on the nucleus paragigantocellularis in the rat ventrolateral medulla: Retrograde and anterograde tracing studies , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[34]  J D Cohen,et al.  A network model of catecholamine effects: gain, signal-to-noise ratio, and behavior. , 1990, Science.

[35]  G Chouvet,et al.  Afferent regulation of locus coeruleus neurons: anatomy, physiology and pharmacology. , 1991, Progress in brain research.

[36]  S. Steinhauer,et al.  The Pupillary Response in Cognitive Psychophysiology and Schizophrenia a , 1992, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[37]  G. Aston-Jones,et al.  Locus coeruleus neurons in monkey are selectively activated by attended cues in a vigilance task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[38]  G. Aston-Jones,et al.  Integration in the ventral medulla and coordination of sympathetic, pain and arousal functions. , 1995, Clinical and experimental hypertension.

[39]  E. Granholm,et al.  Pupillary responses index cognitive resource limitations. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[40]  G. Aston-Jones,et al.  Conditioned responses of monkey locus coeruleus neurons anticipate acquisition of discriminative behavior in a vigilance task , 1997, Neuroscience.

[41]  T. Robbins.  Arousal systems and attentional processes , 1997, Biological Psychology.

[42]  M. Solanto.  Neuropsychopharmacological mechanisms of stimulant drug action in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a review and integration , 1998, Behavioural Brain Research.

[43]  Cognitive and physiological aspects of attention to personally relevant negative information in depression , 1999 .

[44]  J. Cohen,et al.  The role of locus coeruleus in the regulation of cognitive performance. , 1999, Science.

[45]  C. M. Bradshaw,et al.  Comparison of the effects of clonidine and yohimbine on spontaneous pupillary fluctuations in healthy human volunteers , 2000, Psychopharmacology.

[46]  Y Morad,et al.  Pupillography as an objective indicator of fatigue. , 2000, Current eye research.

[47]  T. Zandt,et al.  How to fit a response time distribution , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[48]  J. Diamond,et al.  Sclerotomy complications following pars plana vitrectomy , 2000, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[49]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Simplified dynamics in a model of noradrenergic modulation of cognitive performance , 2002, Neural Networks.

[50]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Phasic Activation of Monkey Locus Ceruleus Neurons by Simple Decisions in a Forced-Choice Task , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  The Role of the Medial Frontal Cortex in Cognitive Control , 2004, Science.

[52]  C. Bradshaw,et al.  Does modafinil activate the locus coeruleus in man? Comparison of modafinil and clonidine on arousal and autonomic functions in human volunteers , 2005, Psychopharmacology.

[53]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance. , 2005, Annual review of neuroscience.

[54]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  An exploration-exploitation model based on norepinepherine and dopamine activity , 2005, NIPS.

[55]  S. Sara,et al.  Network reset: a simplified overarching theory of locus coeruleus noradrenaline function , 2005, Trends in Neurosciences.

[56]  Angela J. Yu,et al.  Uncertainty, Neuromodulation, and Attention , 2005, Neuron.

[57]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction , 1998, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[58]  Raymond J. Dolan,et al.  Anterior cingulate activity during error and autonomic response , 2005, NeuroImage.

[59]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[60]  P. Dayan,et al.  Cortical substrates for exploratory decisions in humans , 2006, Nature.

[61]  Angela J. Yu,et al.  Should I stay or should I go? How the human brain manages the trade-off between exploitation and exploration , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[62]  M. Botvinick.  Conflict monitoring and decision making: Reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function , 2007, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[63]  J. Chapin,et al.  Influence of norepinephrine on somatosensory neuronal responses in the rat thalamus: A combined modeling and in vivo multi-channel, multi-neuron recording study , 2007, Brain Research.

[64]  Eric Shea-Brown,et al.  Optimization of Decision Making in Multilayer Networks: The Role of Locus Coeruleus , 2008, Neural Computation.

[65]  C. Koch,et al.  Pupil dilation reflects perceptual selection and predicts subsequent stability in perceptual rivalry , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[66]  Samuel M. McClure,et al.  BOLD Responses Reflecting Dopaminergic Signals in the Human Ventral Tegmental Area , 2008, Science.

[67]  S. Nieuwenhuis,et al.  The anatomical and functional relationship between the P3 and autonomic components of the orienting response. , 2011, Psychophysiology.