The negotiation and selection of horizontal mechanisms to support post-implementation ERP organizations

Purpose – For an organization to realize the intended benefits of an enternprise resource planning (ERP) investment, it must integrate both technical expertise and functional area knowledge, and it must have continuing support after implementation. The study aims to expand understanding of how organizations ensure the necessary support from functional experts during and after ERP installations. In particular, the study aims to address the question of the type of horizontal support mechanism chosen for this support and how managers make these choices.Design/methodology/approach – The study is a replicated case study based on interviews with project leaders in nine universities judged to have successful PeopleSoft ERP implementations. Thematic analysis is applied to identify the factors influencing managerial choices and organizational decisions made to assure post‐implementation ERP support.Findings – The findings indicate that managers of ERP implementations recognize the necessity for horizontal coordina...

[1]  Robert C. Beatty,et al.  ERP II , 2006, Commun. ACM.

[2]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Enterprise systems, knowledge transfer and power users , 2004, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Mark Srite,et al.  The impact of project team attributes on ERP system implementations: A positivist field investigation , 2010, Inf. Technol. People.

[4]  Neil F. Doherty,et al.  An holistic approach to understanding the changing nature of organisational structure , 2010, Inf. Technol. People.

[5]  Andrew C. Boynton,et al.  Information Architecture: In Search of Efficient Flexibility , 1991, MIS Q..

[6]  Dorothy Leonard-Barton,et al.  A Dual Methodology for Case Studies: Synergistic Use of a Longitudinal Single Site with Replicated Multiple Sites , 1990 .

[7]  Lorraine Staehr,et al.  Understanding the role of managerial agency in achieving business benefits from ERP systems , 2010, Inf. Syst. J..

[8]  Clyde W. Holsapple,et al.  ERP plans and decision-support benefits , 2005, Decis. Support Syst..

[9]  John Leslie King,et al.  Centralized versus decentralized computing: organizational considerations and management options , 1983, CSUR.

[10]  Robin Teigland,et al.  Integrating Knowledge through Information Trading: Examining the Relationship between Boundary Spanning Communication and Individual Performance , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[11]  Christopher J. Hemingway,et al.  Making organisations virtual: the hidden cost of distributed teams , 2004, J. Inf. Technol..

[12]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  T HE C HALLENGES OF I MPLEMENTING “V ANILLA ” V ERSIONS OF ENTERPRISE S , 2005 .

[13]  Sue Newell,et al.  Exploring the Importance of Participation in the Post-Implementation Period of an ES Project: A Neglected Area , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Phillip Ein-Dor,et al.  Organizational Context and MIS Structure: Some Empirical Evidence , 1982, MIS Q..

[15]  W. Orlikowski.  The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations , 2014 .

[16]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[17]  Peter B. Seddon,et al.  A Multi-Project Model of Key Factors Affecting Organizational Benefits from Enterprise Systems , 2010, MIS Q..

[18]  Carol V. Brown,et al.  Reconceptualizing the Context-Design Issue for the Information Systems Function , 1998 .

[19]  Jonathon N. Cummings.  Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[20]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for Implementation and Use of Information Systems , 2005, MIS Q..

[21]  T. Davenport.  Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[22]  M. Tushman,et al.  Boundary Spanning Individuals: Their Role in Information Transfer and Their Antecedents , 1981 .

[23]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Research Commentary: The Organizing Logic for an Enterprise's IT Activities in the Digital Era - A Prognosis of Practice and a Call for Research , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[24]  E. Burton Swanson,et al.  Emergent maintenance of ERP: new roles and relationships , 2001, J. Softw. Maintenance Res. Pract..

[25]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[26]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A Theory of Multiple Contingencies , 1999, MIS Q..

[27]  Jonathan P. Allen.  Value conflicts in enterprise systems , 2005, Inf. Technol. People.

[28]  William J. Kettinger,et al.  When users are IT experts too: the effects of joint IT competence and partnership on satisfaction with enterprise-level systems implementation , 2009, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Mary Sumner,et al.  Seeking strategic advantage in the post-net era: viewing ERP systems from the resource-based perspective , 2004, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development , 1998 .

[31]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The Influence of IT Management Practice on IT Use in Large Organizations , 1994, MIS Q..

[32]  J. D. Johnson,et al.  Liaison Emergence: Relating Theoretical Perspectives , 1982 .

[33]  Shih-Wei Chou,et al.  The implementation factors that influence the ERP (enterprise resource planning) benefits , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[34]  Somnath Bhattacharya,et al.  Organizational performance effects of ERP systems usage: The impact of post-implementation changes , 2006, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Robert C. Ford,et al.  Cross-Functional Structures: A Review and Integration of Matrix Organization and Project Management , 1992 .

[36]  Carol V. Brown,et al.  Managing the Next Wave of Enterprise Systems: Leveraging Lessons from ERP , 2003, MIS Q. Executive.

[37]  Jinyoul Lee,et al.  An ERP implementation case study from a knowledge transfer perspective , 2000, J. Inf. Technol..

[38]  Norman L. Chervany,et al.  The Relationship Between Organizational Characteristics and the Structure of the Information Services Function , 1980, MIS Q..

[39]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  ERP in Practice: A Snapshot of Post-Installation Perception and Behaviors , 2008, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[40]  S. Barley.  The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. , 1990, Administrative science quarterly.

[41]  Ben Light,et al.  A Critical Success Factors Model for ERP Implementation , 1999, IEEE Softw..

[42]  Moshe Zviran,et al.  Factors Affecting the Policy for Distributing Computing Resources , 1989, MIS Q..

[43]  Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah,et al.  Critical factors for successful implementation of enterprise systems , 2001, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[44]  Carol V. Brown.  Horizontal Mechanisms Under Differing IS Organization Contexts , 1999, MIS Q..

[45]  James J. Jiang,et al.  Software Project Risks and Development Focus , 2001 .

[46]  James Cornford,et al.  ERP systems and the university as a "unique" organisation , 2004, Inf. Technol. People.

[47]  Christopher G. Gresov.  Exploring fit and misfit with multiple contingencies. , 1989 .

[48]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Learning from adopters' experiences with ERP: problems encountered and success achieved , 2000, J. Inf. Technol..

[49]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Growing systems in emergent organizations , 1999, CACM.

[50]  M. Markus,et al.  The Enterprise System Experience— From Adoption to Success , 2000 .

[51]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  What Happens After ERP Implementation: Understanding the Impact of Interdependence and Differentiation on Plant-Level Outcomes , 2005, MIS Q..

[52]  Carol V. Brown,et al.  Alignment of the IS Functions With the Enterprise: Toward a Model of Antecedents , 1994, MIS Q..

[53]  C. Ciborra.  The Platform Organization: Recombining Strategies, Structures, and Surprises , 1996 .