Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Buffered Propranolol Sublingual Tablet (Promptol™)—Application of a New “Physiologically Based” Model to Assess Absorption and Disposition

Sublingual administration of certain buffered propranolol may improve the rate and extent of absorption compared to oral administration. The main objectives of this study were to (1) compare the plasma propranolol concentrations (Cp-prop) following sublingual administration of a specially buffered formulation (Promptol™) to that following oral administration of Inderal® and (2) evaluate the utility of a special pharmacokinetic model in describing the Cp-prop following sublingual administration. Eighteen healthy volunteers received 10 mg sublingual Promptol™ or oral Inderal®. Multiple Cp-prop were determined and their pharmacokinetics compared. Additional data following sublingual 40 mg Promptol™ or Inderal® were utilized for evaluation of a special advanced compartmental absorption and transit (ACAT) model. For model simulation, the physicochemical parameters were imported from AMET predictor, whereas the pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated and optimized by Gastroplus®. Based on this model, the quantity of drug absorbed via buccal/sublingual mucosa was estimated. Cp-prop was higher at earlier times with 3-fold greater relative bioavailability following sublingual Promptol™ compared to that from oral Inderal®. The special ACAT model provided excellent goodness of fit of Cp-prop-time curve and estimated a 56.6% increase in absorption rate from Promptol™ and higher initial Cp-prop compared to the regular formulation. The modified ACAT model provided a useful approach to describe sublingual absorption of propranolol and clearly demonstrated an improvement of absorption of Promptol™. The sublingual 10 mg Promptol™ achieved not only a similar systemic exposure as 30 mg oral Inderal® but an earlier effective Cp-prop which may be advantageous for certain clinical conditions.

[1]  Z. Zuo,et al.  Improving sublingual delivery of weak base compounds using pH(max) concept: application to propranolol. , 2010, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[2]  M. Hussain,et al.  Non-invasive systemic drug delivery: developability considerations for alternate routes of administration. , 2010, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[3]  Michael B. Bolger,et al.  Simulations of the Nonlinear Dose Dependence for Substrates of Influx and Efflux Transporters in the Human Intestine , 2009, The AAPS Journal.

[4]  Michael B. Bolger,et al.  Prediction of Modified Release Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics from In Vitro, Immediate Release, and Intravenous Data , 2009, The AAPS Journal.

[5]  Lawrence X. Yu,et al.  Mechanistic Approaches to Predicting Oral Drug Absorption , 2009, The AAPS Journal.

[6]  R. Pitman,et al.  Preventing Postsurgical Dissatisfaction Syndrome after Rhinoplasty with Propranolol: A Pilot Study , 2009, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[7]  R. Sega,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of propranolol in normal healthy volunteers , 1977, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[8]  Harold G. Boxenbaum,et al.  Statistical estimations in pharmacokinetics , 1974, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[9]  G. Duchateau,et al.  Bioavailability of Propranolol After Oral, Sublingual, and Intranasal Administration , 1986, Pharmaceutical Research.

[10]  M. Safar,et al.  Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of intravenous dl-propranolol in borderline and permanent hypertension , 2004, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[11]  C. Marmar,et al.  Immediate treatment with propranolol decreases posttraumatic stress disorder two months after trauma , 2003, Biological Psychiatry.

[12]  L. Cahill,et al.  Propranolol for Reemergent Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Following an Event of Retraumatization: A Case Study , 2002, Journal of traumatic stress.

[13]  P. Fourneret,et al.  [Interest of propranolol in the treatment of school refusal anxiety: about three clinical observations]. , 2001, L'Encephale.

[14]  V. Akila,et al.  Information , 2001, The Lancet.

[15]  T. Bruce,et al.  Social anxiety disorder: a common, underrecognized mental disorder. , 1999, American family physician.

[16]  J. Leslie,et al.  Effects of Propranolol, Buspirone, pCPA, Reserpine, and Chlordiazepoxide on Open-Field Behavior , 1998, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[17]  K. Mealy,et al.  Propranolol reduces the anxiety associated with day case surgery. , 1996, The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica.

[18]  G. McEvoy,et al.  AHFS Drug Information , 1994 .

[19]  G. D. Johnston,et al.  Dose-response relationships with antihypertensive drugs. , 1992, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[20]  R. S. de Paula,et al.  [Comparison of the effects of diazepam, nifedipine, propranolol and a combination of nifedipine and propranolol, by sublingual administration, in patients with hypertensive crisis]. , 1991, Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia.

[21]  L. Tavazzi,et al.  Effects of propranolol, atenolol, and chlordesmethildiazepam on response to mental stress in patients with recent myocardial infarction , 1987, Clinical cardiology.

[22]  T. Walle,et al.  Food effects on propranolol systemic and oral clearance: Support for a blood flow hypothesis , 1986, Clinical pharmacology and therapy.

[23]  C. Squier,et al.  In-vitro permeability of porcine oral mucosa after epithelial separation, stripping and hydration. , 1985, Archives of oral biology.

[24]  W. Frishman,et al.  β-Adrenoceptor Antagonists: New Drugs and New Indications , 1981 .

[25]  K. Ohashi,et al.  Drug recovery following buccal absorption of propranolol. , 1980, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[26]  Kates Re Absorption kinetics of sublingually administered propranolol. , 1977 .

[27]  R. Kates Absorption kinetics of sublingually administered propranolol. , 1977, Journal of medicine.

[28]  C. Chidsey,et al.  Correlation of Plasma Propranolol Concentration with Therapeutic Response in Patients with Angina Pectoris , 1975, Circulation.

[29]  S. Julius,et al.  Role of Parasympathetic Inhibition in the Hyperkinetic Type of Borderline Hypertension , 1971, Circulation.