Managing the on-line classroom

[1]  J. Arbaugh.  How Classroom Environment and Student Engagement Affect Learning in Internet-based MBA Courses , 2000 .

[2]  Elizabeth J. Rozell,et al.  Computer efficacy: Determinants, consequences, and malleability , 2000 .

[3]  J. Arbaugh.  Virtual Classroom Characteristics and Student Satisfaction with Internet-Based MBA Courses , 2000 .

[4]  A. Grasha,et al.  Integrating Teaching Styles and Learning Styles with Instructional Technology , 2000 .

[5]  Marilyn K. Potts,et al.  Going the Distance , 2000 .

[6]  Lisa M. Ellram,et al.  Purchasing Education on the Internet , 1999 .

[7]  Charles J. Fornaciari,et al.  Distance Education as Strategy: How Can Your School Compete? , 1999 .

[8]  Natalie S. Berger,et al.  Pioneering Experiences in Distance Learning: Lessons Learned , 1999 .

[9]  Wendy M. Grossman.  On-Line U , 1999 .

[10]  Allen C. Bluedorn,et al.  The relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management , 1999 .

[11]  A. Hollingshead,et al.  Collaborative learning and computer‐supported groups , 1999 .

[12]  Lawrence R. Wheeless,et al.  Nonverbal communication expectancies about teachers and enrollment behavior in distance learning , 1999 .

[13]  JoAnn Greco,et al.  GOING THE DISTANCE FOR MBA CANDIDATES , 1999 .

[14]  Yogesh Malhotra,et al.  Bringing the adopter back into the adoption process: A personal construction framework of information technology adoption , 1999 .

[15]  K. Menzel,et al.  The impact of gender and immediacy on willingness to talk and perceived learning , 1999 .

[16]  William H. Glick,et al.  Common Methods Bias: Does Common Methods Variance Really Bias Results? , 1998 .

[17]  S. Myers,et al.  Instructor immediacy in the Chinese college classroom , 1998 .

[18]  Paula D. Harveston,et al.  Transformation of MBA programs: Meeting the challenge of international competition , 1998 .

[19]  R. Rubin,et al.  Internet and face‐to‐face communication: Not functional alternatives , 1998 .

[20]  Scott A. Myers,et al.  Student perceptions of instructor immediacy in conventional and distributed learning classrooms , 1998 .

[21]  Shuqiang Zhang,et al.  Assessing Distance Learners' Satisfaction with Instruction: A Quantitative and a Qualitative Method. , 1998 .

[22]  David R. Moore,et al.  Building Interactivity into Web Courses: Tools for Social and Instructional Interaction. , 1998 .

[23]  T. Anderson,et al.  Online Social Interchange, Discord, and Knowledge Construction , 1998 .

[24]  D. Vogel,et al.  Using Information Technology to Add Value to Management Education , 1997 .

[25]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Gender Differences in the Perception and Use of E-Mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model , 1997, MIS Q..

[26]  Merrill Warkentin,et al.  Virtual Teams versus Face-to-Face Teams: An Exploratory Study of a Web-based Conference System* , 1997 .

[27]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Asynchronous learning networks as a virtual classroom , 1997, CACM.

[28]  J. Dobson,et al.  Women, Ethics, and MBAs , 1997 .

[29]  Scott L. Althaus.  Please Scroll down for Article Communication Education Computer-mediated Communication in the University Classroom: an Experiment with On-line Discussions , 2022 .

[30]  Christine T. Kydd,et al.  Individual characteristics associated with World Wide Web use: an empirical study of playfulness and motivation , 1997, DATB.

[31]  C. Gunawardena,et al.  Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer‐mediated conferencing environment , 1997 .

[32]  R. A. Dumont,et al.  Teaching and learning in cyberspace , 1996 .

[33]  Gabriel Szulanski.  Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[34]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  Relational Development in Computer-Supported Groups , 1996, MIS Q..

[35]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  Getting a Clue , 1996 .

[36]  Patricia Comeaux,et al.  The impact of an interactive distance learning network on classroom communication , 1995 .

[37]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  The Use of Information Technology to Enhance Management School Education: A Theoretical View , 1995, MIS Q..

[38]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Using IT to Reengineer Business Education: An Exploratory Investigation of Collaborative Telelearning , 1995, MIS Q..

[39]  James L. McKenney,et al.  Social Context and Interaction in Ongoing Computer-Supported Management Groups , 1995 .

[40]  J. Comstock,et al.  Food for thought: Teacher nonverbal immediacy, student learning, and curvilinearity , 1995 .

[41]  Karen L. Murphy,et al.  Competencies for distance education professionals , 1995 .

[42]  Zane L. Berge,et al.  Facilitating Computer Conferencing: Recommendations from the Field. , 1995 .

[43]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Constructivism and computer‐mediated communication in distance education , 1995 .

[44]  J. Walther.  Anticipated Ongoing Interaction Versus Channel Effects on Relational Communication in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1994 .

[45]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Influence of Experience on Personal Computer Utilization: Testing a Conceptual Model , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[46]  Maryam Alavi,et al.  Computer-Mediated Collaborative Learning: An Empirical Evaluation , 1994, MIS Q..

[47]  E. Bailey,et al.  Teaching via the Internet. , 1994 .

[48]  Ann Bainbridge Frymier.  A model of immediacy in the classroom , 1994 .

[49]  C. Nass.  Knowledge or Skills: Which Do Administrators Learn from Experience? , 1994 .

[50]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[51]  Ellen D. Wagner,et al.  In Support of a Functional Definition of Interaction , 1994 .

[52]  Terence C. Ahern,et al.  The Effects of Teacher Discourse in Computer-Mediated Discussion , 1992 .

[53]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Development and Test of a Theory of Technological Learning and Usage , 1992 .

[54]  J. Walther.  Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1992 .

[55]  Connie L. Dillon,et al.  Instructional Strategies and Student Involvement in Distance Education: A Study of the Oklahoma Televised Instruction System , 1991 .

[56]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization , 1991 .

[57]  Diane M. Christophel.  The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning , 1990 .

[58]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Assessing method variance in multitrait-multimethod matrices: The case of self-reported affect and perceptions at work. , 1990 .

[59]  Michael Z. Hackman,et al.  Instructional communication in the televised classroom: The effects of system design and teacher immediacy on student learning and satisfaction , 1990 .

[60]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[61]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[62]  Joseph A. Cote,et al.  Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Reality or artifact? , 1989 .

[63]  J. Gorham.  The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning , 1988 .

[64]  Virginia P. Richmond,et al.  The Relationship Between Selected Immediacy Behaviors and Cognitive Learning , 1987 .

[65]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  The “Virtual Classroom”: Using Computer‐Mediated Communication for University Teaching , 1986 .

[66]  R. Rice,et al.  The New Media: Communication, Research, and Technology. , 1984 .

[67]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[68]  J. F. Andersen.  Teacher Immediacy as a Predictor of Teaching Effectiveness , 1979 .