Environment, but not migration rate, influences extinction risk in experimental metapopulations

Ecological theory suggests that several demographic factors influence metapopulation extinction risk, including synchrony in population size between subpopulations, metapopulation size and the magnitude of fluctuations in population size. Theoretically, each of these is influenced by the rate of migration between subpopulations. Here we report on an experiment where we manipulated migration rate within metapopulations of the freshwater zooplankton Daphnia magna to examine how migration influenced each of these demographic variables, and subsequent effects on metapopulation extinction. In addition, our experimental procedures introduced unplanned but controlled differences between metapopulations in light intensity, enabling us to examine the relative influences of environmental and demographic factors. We found that increasing migration rate increased subpopulation synchrony. We failed to detect effects of migration on population size and fluctuations in population size at the metapopulation or subpopulation level, however. In contrast, light intensity did not influence synchrony, but was positively correlated with population size and negatively correlated with population fluctuation. Finally, synchrony did not influence time to extinction, while population size and the magnitude of fluctuations did. We conclude that environmental factors had a greater influence on extinction risk than demographic factors, and that metapopulation size and fluctuation were more important to extinction risk than metapopulation synchrony.

[1]  I. Hanski,et al.  Migration, Metapopulation Dynamics and Fugitive Co-existence , 1993 .

[2]  S. Matter,et al.  Encroaching forests decouple alpine butterfly population dynamics , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  W. Lampert.  Daphnia: Model herbivore, predator and prey , 2006 .

[4]  J. H. Zar,et al.  Biostatistical Analysis (5th Edition) , 1984 .

[5]  H. G. Andrewartha,et al.  The distribution and abundance of animals. , 1954 .

[6]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  Spatial Synchrony in Population Dynamics , 2004 .

[7]  Eric Moulines,et al.  Inference in hidden Markov models , 2010, Springer series in statistics.

[8]  L. Keith.  Role of food in hare population cycles , 1983 .

[9]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Spatial Structure and Population Extinction: A Study with Drosophila Flies , 1989 .

[10]  C. Weber.  Methods for measuring the acute toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater and marine organisms , 1991 .

[11]  James H. Brown,et al.  Turnover Rates in Insular Biogeography: Effect of Immigration on Extinction , 1977 .

[12]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Theory of Island Biogeography , 1969 .

[13]  E. Ranta,et al.  Synchronous dynamics and rates of extinction in spatially structured populations , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  J. Drake,et al.  A review of extinction in experimental populations. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[15]  J. Molofsky,et al.  Extinction dynamics in experimental metapopulations. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  John M Drake,et al.  Effects of habitat quality and size on extinction in experimental populations , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  R. Macarthur,et al.  AN EQUILIBRIUM THEORY OF INSULAR ZOOGEOGRAPHY , 1963 .

[18]  T. Waite,et al.  Minimizing extinction risk through genetic rescue , 2005, Animal Biodiversity and Conservation.

[19]  Andrew Gonzalez,et al.  POPULATION SYNCHRONY INDUCED BY RESOURCE FLUCTUATIONS AND DISPERSAL IN AN AQUATIC MICROCOSM , 2005 .

[20]  H. Pulliam,et al.  Sources, Sinks, and Population Regulation , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[21]  W. Schaffer,et al.  Chaos reduces species extinction by amplifying local population noise , 1993, Nature.

[22]  K. McGraw,et al.  Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. , 1996 .

[23]  A. Ives,et al.  The Synergistic Effects of Stochasticity and Dispersal on Population Densities , 2004, American Naturalist.

[24]  Hans Rott.  Coherence and Conservatism in the Dynamics of Belief II: Iterated Belief Change without Dispositional Coherence , 2003, J. Log. Comput..

[25]  G. Belovsky,et al.  Experimental studies of extinction dynamics , 1999, Science.

[26]  Sutirth Dey,et al.  Stability via Asynchrony in Drosophila Metapopulations with Low Migration Rates , 2006, Science.

[27]  R. Sibly,et al.  Metapopulation dynamics of fruit flies undergoing evolutionary change in patchy environments , 2001 .

[28]  Sean R. Eddy,et al.  Biological Sequence Analysis: Probabilistic Models of Proteins and Nucleic Acids , 1998 .

[29]  Anders Hobæk,et al.  Sexual reproduction in Daphnia magna requires three stimuli , 1992 .

[30]  R. Rosenberg,et al.  Density-dependent migration in an Amphiura filiformis (Amphiuridae, Echinodermata) infaunal population , 1997 .

[31]  S. Matter.  Synchrony, extinction, and dynamics of spatially segregated, heterogeneous populations , 2001 .

[32]  P. Grambsch,et al.  Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals , 1994 .

[33]  P. Jagers,et al.  Extinction , 2009, What Fire.