A Perceptually Optimized Wavelet Embedded Zero Tree Image Coder

In this paper, we propose a Perceptually Optimized Embedded ZeroTree Image Coder (POEZIC) that introduces a perceptual weighting to wavelet transform coefficients prior to control SPIHT encoding algorithm in order to reach a targeted bit rate with a perceptual quality improvement with respect to the coding quality obtained using the SPIHT algorithm only. The paper also, introduces a new objective quality metric based on a Psychovisual model that integrates the properties of the HVS that plays an important role in our POEZIC quality assessment. Our POEZIC coder is based on a vision model that incorporates various masking effects of human visual system HVS perception. Thus, our coder weights the wavelet coefficients based on that model and attempts to increase the perceptual quality for a given bit rate and observation distance. The perceptual weights for all wavelet subbands are computed based on 1) luminance masking and Contrast masking, 2) the contrast sensitivity function CSF to achieve the perceptual decomposition weighting, 3) the Wavelet Error Sensitivity WES used to reduce the perceptual quantization errors. The new perceptually optimized codec has the same complexity as the original SPIHT techniques. However, the experiments results show that our coder demonstrates very good performance in terms of quality measurement. Keywords—DWT, linear-phase 9/7 filter, 9/7 Wavelets Error Sensitivity WES, CSF implementation approaches, JND Just Noticeable Difference, Luminance masking, Contrast masking, standard SPIHT, Objective Quality Measure, Probability Score PS.

[1]  Patrick C. Teo,et al.  Perceptual image distortion , 1994, Electronic Imaging.

[2]  William A. Pearlman,et al.  A new, fast, and efficient image codec based on set partitioning in hierarchical trees , 1996, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[3]  Reginald L. Lagendijk,et al.  Perceptual image quality based on a multiple channel HVS model , 1995, 1995 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[4]  Scott J. Daly,et al.  Visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity , 1992, Electronic Imaging.

[5]  J A Solomon,et al.  Model of visual contrast gain control and pattern masking. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[6]  Murat Kunt,et al.  Wavelet-based color image compression: exploiting the contrast sensitivity function , 2003, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[7]  Geoffrey M. Boynton,et al.  New model of human luminance pattern vision mechanisms: analysis of the effects of pattern orientation, spatial phase, and temporal frequency , 1994, Other Conferences.

[8]  J. Robson,et al.  Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field , 1981, Vision Research.

[9]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Contrast masking in human vision. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[10]  I. Daubechies,et al.  Biorthogonal bases of compactly supported wavelets , 1992 .

[11]  Thrasyvoulos N. Pappas,et al.  Supra-threshold perceptual image coding , 1996, Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[12]  Andrew P. Bradley,et al.  A wavelet visible difference predictor , 1999, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[13]  J. Ross,et al.  Contrast adaptation and contrast masking in human vision , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  Shawmin Lei,et al.  Visual masking in wavelet compression for JPEG-2000 , 2000, Electronic Imaging.

[15]  A. Watson Probability summation over time , 1979, Vision Research.

[16]  Robert J. Safranek,et al.  Comparison of the coding efficiency of perceptual models , 1995, Electronic Imaging.

[17]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Human luminance pattern-vision mechanisms: masking experiments require a new model. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[18]  Robert J. Safranek,et al.  Signal compression based on models of human perception , 1993, Proc. IEEE.

[19]  Christoph Zetzsche,et al.  Multiple Channel Model For The Prediction Of Subjective Image Quality , 1989, Photonics West - Lasers and Applications in Science and Engineering.

[20]  Lina J. Karam,et al.  Adaptive image coding with perceptual distortion control , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[21]  Andrew B. Watson,et al.  DCT quantization matrices visually optimized for individual images , 1993, Electronic Imaging.