Mammogram retrieval on similar mass lesions

Enormous numbers of digital mammograms have been produced in hospitals and breast screening centers. To exploit those valuable resources in aiding diagnoses and research, content-based mammogram retrieval systems are required to effectively access the mammogram databases. This paper presents a content-based mammogram retrieval system, which allows medical professionals to seek mass lesions that are pathologically similar to a given example. In this retrieval system, shape and margin features of mass lesions are extracted to represent the characteristics of mammographic lesions. To compare the similarity between the query example and any lesion within the databases, this study proposes a similarity measure scheme which involves the hierarchical arrangement of mammographic features and a weighting distance measure. This makes similarity measure of the retrieval system consistent with the way radiologists observe mass lesions. This study used the DDSM dataset to evaluate the effectiveness of the extracted shape feature and margin feature, respectively. Experimental results demonstrate that, when Zernike moments are used, round-shape masses are the most discriminative among four types of shape; the circumscribed-margin masses can be effectively discriminated among the four types of margins. Moreover, the result also shows that, when retrieving round-shape and circumscribed margin masses, this retrieval system can achieve the highest precision among all mass lesion types.

[1]  Nikos Dimitropoulos,et al.  Mammographic masses characterization based on localized texture and dataset fractal analysis using linear, neural and support vector machine classifiers , 2006, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[2]  C. Rekha,et al.  Approaches For Automated Detection And Classification Of Masses In Mammograms , 2014 .

[3]  Michael Brady,et al.  Mammographic Image Analysis , 1999, Computational Imaging and Vision.

[4]  L. Rodney Long,et al.  Evaluation of shape similarity measurement methods for spine X-ray images , 2004, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[5]  N Karssemeijer,et al.  Use of border information in the classification of mammographic masses , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  G. Witham,et al.  Information needs of the informal carers of women treated for breast cancer. , 2007, European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society.

[7]  Bo Meng,et al.  Computer-aided detection of mammographic masses based on content-based image retrieval , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[8]  Zongmin Ma,et al.  Artificial Intelligence for Maximizing Content Based Image Retrieval , 2008 .

[9]  Wu Guo-Zua,et al.  H.264ビデオのロバスト電子透かし埋め込み/検出アルゴリズム , 2005 .

[10]  Arnau Oliver,et al.  A review of automatic mass detection and segmentation in mammographic images , 2010, Medical Image Anal..

[11]  Rangaraj M. Rangayyan,et al.  Content-based retrieval and analysis of mammographic masses , 2005, J. Electronic Imaging.

[12]  Lucas C. Parra,et al.  A multi-scale probabilistic network model for detection, synthesis and compression in mammographic image analysis , 2003, Medical Image Anal..

[13]  R. Rangayyan,et al.  Boundary modelling and shape analysis methods for classification of mammographic masses , 2000, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[14]  John B. Shoven,et al.  I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.

[15]  W N Charman,et al.  Wavefront technology: past, present and future. , 2005, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[16]  L. Rodney Long,et al.  Partial shape matching for CBIR of spine x-ray images , 2003, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[17]  Rafael C. González,et al.  Local Determination of a Moving Contrast Edge , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[18]  Chang-Tsun Li,et al.  Trademark image retrieval using synthetic features for describing global shape and interior structure , 2009, Pattern Recognit..

[19]  Jean Ponce,et al.  Computer Vision: A Modern Approach , 2002 .

[20]  Barbara Sternfeld,et al.  The association between mammographic breast density and bone mineral density in the study of women's health across the nation. , 2007, Annals of epidemiology.

[21]  Rangaraj M. Rangayyan,et al.  Content-based Retrieval of Mammograms Using Visual Features Related to Breast Density Patterns , 2007, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[22]  K. Doi,et al.  Determination of subjective similarity for pairs of masses and pairs of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms: comparison of similarity ranking scores and absolute similarity ratings. , 2007, Medical physics.

[23]  Wesley E. Snyder,et al.  Content-based image retrieval in picture archiving and communications systems , 2009, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[24]  Carla E. Brodley,et al.  ASSERT: A Physician-in-the-Loop Content-Based Retrieval System for HRCT Image Databases , 1999, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[25]  Pasquale Delogu,et al.  Characterization of mammographic masses using a gradient-based segmentation algorithm and a neural classifier , 2007, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[26]  Carla E. Brodley,et al.  Content-Based Retrieval from Medical Image Databases: A Synergy of Human Interaction, Machine Learning and Computer Vision , 1999, AAAI/IAAI.

[27]  David Gur,et al.  Detection and classification performance levels of mammographic masses under different computer-aided detection cueing environments. , 2004, Academic radiology.

[28]  Nicholas Perry,et al.  Correlates of high-density mammographic parenchymal patterns by menopausal status in a rural population in Northern Greece. , 2005, European journal of cancer.

[29]  Dimitris A. Karras,et al.  A new class of Zernike moments for computer vision applications , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[30]  Nikos Dimitropoulos,et al.  Multi-scaled morphological features for the characterization of mammographic masses using statistical classification schemes , 2007, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[31]  Raveendran Paramesran,et al.  On the computational aspects of Zernike moments , 2007, Image Vis. Comput..

[32]  M. Giger,et al.  Computerized characterization of mammographic masses: analysis of spiculation. , 1994, Cancer letters.

[33]  David Gur,et al.  Detection and classification performance levels of mammographic masses under different computer-aided detection cueing environments1☆ , 2004 .

[34]  Yue Li,et al.  Content-Based Retrieval for Mammograms , 2009 .

[35]  Carla E. Brodley,et al.  ASSERT: A PHYSICIAN-IN-THE-LOOP CONTENT-BASED IMAGE RETRIEVAL SYSTEM FOR HRCT IMAGE DATABASES , 1999 .

[36]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..