Insurance Type and Major Complications After Hysterectomy

Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between primary insurance type and major complications after hysterectomy. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on women with Medicaid, Medicare, and private insurance who underwent hysterectomy from January 1, 2012, to July 1, 2014, and were included in the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative. Major complications within 30 days of surgery included the following: deep/organ space surgical site infection, deep venous and pulmonary thromboembolism, myocardial infarction or stroke, pneumonia or sepsis, blood transfusion, readmission, and death. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with major complications and characteristics associated with the Medicaid and Medicare groups. Results A total of 1577 women had Medicaid, 2103 had Medicare, and 11,611 had private insurance. The Medicaid and Medicare groups had a similar rate of major complications, nearly double that of the private insurance group (6.85% vs 7.85% vs 3.79%; P < .001). Compared with private insurance, women with Medicaid and Medicare had increased odds of major complications (Medicaid: odds ratio [OR], 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26–2.04; P < .001; Medicare: OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.04–1.73; P = .03). Women with Medicaid were more likely to be nonwhite, have a higher body mass index (BMI), report tobacco use in the last year and undergo an abdominal hysterectomy. Those with Medicare were more likely to be white, to have gynecologic cancer, and to be functionally dependent. Both groups had increased odds of American Society of Anesthesiology class 3 or higher and decreased odds of undergoing hysterectomy at large hospitals (≥500 beds). Conclusions Women with Medicaid and Medicare insurance have increased odds of major complications after hysterectomy. Abdominal hysterectomy, BMI, and smoking are potentially modifiable risk factors for women with Medicaid.

[1]  M. Talamini,et al.  Quality and safety in obesity surgery-15 years of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass outcomes from a longitudinal database. , 2016, Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery.

[2]  N. Nader,et al.  The Effect of Adding Functional Classification to ASA Status for Predicting 30-Day Mortality , 2015, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[3]  D. Campbell,et al.  Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism After Hysterectomy , 2015, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  J. Chapman,et al.  Medicaid Status Is Associated With Higher Surgical Site Infection Rates After Spine Surgery , 2014, Spine.

[5]  M. Menon,et al.  Venous thromboembolism after major cancer surgery: temporal trends and patterns of care. , 2014, JAMA surgery.

[6]  Matthew M Davis,et al.  Potential Adult Medicaid Beneficiaries Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Compared With Current Adult Medicaid Beneficiaries , 2013, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[7]  A. Neugut,et al.  Nationwide Trends in the Performance of Inpatient Hysterectomy in the United States , 2013, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  Dawn L Hershman,et al.  Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease. , 2013, JAMA.

[9]  D. LaPar,et al.  Primary payer status is significantly associated with postoperative mortality, morbidity, and hospital resource utilization in pediatric surgical patients within the United States. , 2013, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[10]  C. Bhamidipati,et al.  Primary Payer Status Affects Mortality for Major Surgical Operations , 2010, Annals of surgery.

[11]  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 444: choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. , 2009, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  Jennifer M Wu,et al.  Hysterectomy Rates in the United States, 2003 , 2007, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  K. Kluivers,et al.  Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[14]  Carmen DeNavas-Walt,et al.  Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2004 , 2006 .

[15]  R. Hakim,et al.  Quality of care for women undergoing a hysterectomy: effects of insurance and race/ethnicity. , 2004, American journal of public health.

[16]  C. Steiner,et al.  Hysterectomy Rates in the United States 1990–1997 , 2002, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  J. House,et al.  Socioeconomic disparities in health change in a longitudinal study of US adults: the role of health-risk behaviors. , 2001, Social science & medicine.

[18]  E. Myers,et al.  Risk adjustment for complications of hysterectomy: limitations of routinely collected administrative data. , 1999, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[19]  E. Spitznagel,et al.  ASA Physical Status Classifications: A Study of Consistency of Ratings , 1978, Anesthesiology.

[20]  W. M. Barclay Surgery , 1894, Bristol medico-chirurgical journal.