Multistatic search theory

The characterizing feature of multistatic sensor systems is the inclusion of geographically independent receivers that might receive echoes from any source. We develop a simple analytic theory to predict detection probability, and use it to study pattern optimization, cost/effectiveness, reliability and the relative attractiveness of multistatic versus monostatic systems. INTRODUCTION A typical monostatic radar or sonar sensor includes one transmitter or source (Tx) and one receiver (Rx). Tx emits pulses that travel to a target and are reflected from it. Rx detects the reflected pulses, and the time difference between transmission and reception determines the distance to the target. Tx and Rx are co-located, and may even use the same antenna. The range ρ of the sensor is the largest distance at which detection is possible. At its simplest, barring complications due to topography or directional background noise, one can visualize the effect of each sensor as a covered circle with radius ρ. Much of our intuition about search is built on this idea of individual covered areas. For example 1. A barrier can be constructed by using multiple sensors whose circles slightly overlap. 2. The area covered by a system of sensors is easily illustrated on a map. 3. If you move one sensor, there is no effect on the others. A multistatic system incorporates multiple sources and receivers that are not paired. Any Rx can receive reflected transmissions from any Tx, and they can be present in different numbers. Figure 1 illustrates the basic structure of a monostatic sensor and a multistatic system. Here are some arguments in favor of multistatic sonar systems: 1. Receivers are less expensive than sources (Amanipour & Olfat, 2011), so it makes sense to employ more receivers than sources. For example, the U.S. Navy’s SSQ-125 active sonobuoy costs about five times as much as the SSQ-53 passive sonobuoy, one of the sonobuoy types that can listen for its signals (Signal Online, 2012; USN, 2014). 2. A multistatic system can employ different platforms for sources and receivers. A ship might be Tx, while Rx is a sonobuoy. 3. Sources reveal their locations when they transmit, and targets can use that information to avoid detection. However, the independent receivers in a multistatic system do not reveal their positions.

[1]  Feller William,et al.  An Introduction To Probability Theory And Its Applications , 1950 .

[2]  M P Fewell,et al.  Track-Initiation Probability for Multistatic Sonar Fields , 2011 .

[3]  Junshan Zhang,et al.  Barrier coverage in bistatic radar sensor networks: cassini oval sensing and optimal placement , 2013, MobiHoc '13.

[4]  S. Coraluppi,et al.  Distributed tracking in multistatic sonar , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[5]  Tactical Planning with Genetic Algorithms for Multi-static Active Sonobuoy Systems , .

[6]  Hyeonbae Kang,et al.  Multistatic Imaging of Extended Targets , 2012, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[7]  Henry Cox,et al.  Fundamentals of Bistatic Active SONAR , 1989 .

[8]  A.J. Devaney Time reversal imaging of obscured targets from multistatic data , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[9]  Martina Daun,et al.  Tracking Algorithms for Multistatic Sonar Systems , 2010, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[10]  Stefano Coraluppi,et al.  Intra-Ping Timing Issues in Multistatic Sonar Tracking , 2004 .

[11]  Ng Chee Yong Multistatic radar imaging of moving targets , 2009 .

[12]  Andrea Giorgetti,et al.  Localization Capability of Cooperative Anti-Intruder Radar Systems , 2008, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[13]  S. Simakov,et al.  Localization in Airborne Multistatic Sonars , 2008, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[14]  Ali Olfat,et al.  CFAR detection for multistatic radar , 2008, 2008 International Radar Symposium.

[15]  M.A. El-Sharkawi,et al.  Probability of Target Presence for Multistatic Sonar Ping Sequencing , 2009, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[16]  M.C. Wicks,et al.  Multistatic radar systems signal processing , 2006, 2006 IEEE Conference on Radar.

[17]  Andrew C. Coon Spatial Correlation of Detections for Impulsive Echo Ranging Sonar , 1997 .

[18]  Irene A. Stegun,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions. , 1966 .

[19]  J. I. Bowen,et al.  A MULTISTATIC PERFORMANCE PREDICTION METHODOLOGY , 1999 .

[20]  Fulvio Gini,et al.  Posterior Cramér-Rao lower bounds for passive bistatic radar tracking with uncertain target measurements , 2013, Signal Process..

[21]  Martina Daun,et al.  Tracking in multistatic passive radar systems using DAB/DVB-T illumination , 2012, Signal Process..

[22]  Thia Kirubarajan,et al.  Joint path planning and sensor subset selection for multistatic sensor networks , 2009, 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Security and Defense Applications.

[23]  M P Fewell,et al.  On the Design of Multistatic Sonobuoy Fields for Area Search , 2011 .

[24]  G. Krieger,et al.  Analysis of multistatic configurations for spaceborne SAR interferometry , 2003 .

[25]  Anshu Saksena,et al.  Dynamic ping optimization for surveillance in multistatic sonar buoy networks with energy constraints , 2008, 2008 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[26]  Jian Li,et al.  Multistatic Adaptive Microwave Imaging for Early Breast Cancer Detection , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.