Abstract Aircraft engines can be effective actuators to help pilots avert or recover from emergency situations. Emergency control modes are being developed to enhance the engines’ performance to increase the probability of recovery under these circumstances. This paper discusses a proposed implementation of an architecture that requests emergency propulsion control modes, allowing the engines to deliver additional performance in emergency situations while still ensuring a specified safety level. In order to determine the appropriate level of engine performance enhancement, information regarding the current emergency scenario (including severity) and current engine health must be known. This enables the engine to operate beyond its nominal range while minimizing overall risk to the aircraft. In this architecture, the flight controller is responsible for determining the severity of the event and the level of engine risk that is acceptable, while the engine controller is responsible for delivering the desired performance within the specified risk range. A control mode selector specifies an appropriate situation-specific enhanced mode, which the engine controller then implements. The enhanced control modes described in this paper provide additional engine thrust or response capabilities through the modification of gains, limits, and the control algorithm, but increase the risk of engine failure. The modifications made to the engine controller to enable the use of the enhanced control modes are described, as are the interaction between the various subsystems and importantly, the interaction between the flight controller/pilot and the propulsion control system. Simulation results demonstrate how the system responds to requests for enhanced operation and the corresponding increase in performance.
[1]
Thomas M. Lavelle,et al.
A High-Fidelity Simulation of a Generic Commercial Aircraft Engine and Controller
,
2010
.
[2]
Ten-Huei Guo,et al.
Fast Thrust Response for Improved Flight/Engine Control under Emergency Conditions
,
2008
.
[3]
Ten-Huei Guo,et al.
Risk Management for Intelligent Fast Engine Response Control
,
2009
.
[4]
Trindel A. Maine,et al.
Manual Manipulation of Engine Throttles for Emergency Flight Control
,
2013
.
[5]
Ryan D. May,et al.
A Sensitivity Study of Commercial Aircraft Engine Response for Emergency Situations
,
2011
.
[6]
Frank W. Burcham,et al.
Controlling crippled aircraft-with throttles
,
1991
.
[7]
Ryan D. May,et al.
Improving Engine Responsiveness during Approach through High Speed Idle Control
,
2011
.
[8]
Ryan D. May,et al.
Control Design for a Generic Commercial Aircraft Engine
,
2010
.
[9]
Ten-Huei Guo,et al.
A Risk Assessment Architecture for Enhanced Engine Operation
,
2010
.
[10]
Ten-Huei Guo,et al.
The Case for Intelligent Propulsion Control for Fast Engine Response
,
2009
.