Shoring Up the Shaky Psychological Foundations of a Micro-Economic Model of Ideology: Adversarial Collaboration Solutions

Commentary on Gries, T., Mueller, V., & Jost, J. (2021). The market for belief systems: A formal model of ideological choice. Psychological Inquiry.

[1]  L. Zmigrod,et al.  A Psychology of Ideology: Unpacking the Psychological Structure of Ideological Thinking , 2020, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[2]  Thomas H. Costello,et al.  Are Conservatives More Rigid Than Liberals? A Meta-Analytic Test of the Rigidity-of-the-Right Hypothesis , 2021 .

[3]  Ariel Malka,et al.  Rethinking the Link Between Self-Reported Personality Traits and Political Preferences , 2021 .

[4]  T. Kowatsch,et al.  Changing personality traits with the help of a digital personality change intervention , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  C. Sibley,et al.  Does Openness to Experience predict changes in conservatism? A nine-wave longitudinal investigation into the personality roots to ideology , 2020 .

[6]  Thomas H. Costello,et al.  Social and Economic Political Ideology Consistently Operate as Mutual Suppressors: Implications for Personality, Social, and Political Psychology , 2020, Social Psychological and Personality Science.

[7]  Nathan P. Kalmoe.  Uses and Abuses of Ideology in Political Psychology , 2020, Political Psychology.

[8]  Eiko I. Fried,et al.  Lack of Theory Building and Testing Impedes Progress in The Factor and Network Literature , 2020, Psychological Inquiry.

[9]  Ananish Chaudhuri,et al.  The dual evolutionary foundations of political ideology , 2019, Nature Human Behaviour.

[10]  L. G. Conway,et al.  Strategic Communication and the Integrative Complexity‐Ideology Relationship: Meta‐Analytic Findings Reveal Differences Between Public Politicians and Private Citizens in Their Use of Simple Rhetoric , 2019, Political Psychology.

[11]  K. Stanovich,et al.  The need for intellectual diversity in psychological science: Our own studies of actively open-minded thinking as a case study , 2019, Cognition.

[12]  David C. Funder,et al.  Evaluating Effect Size in Psychological Research: Sense and Nonsense , 2019, Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science.

[13]  J. Baron,et al.  False Equivalence: Are Liberals and Conservatives in the United States Equally Biased? , 2019, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[14]  Gabriel S. Lenz,et al.  The Importance of Knowing “What Goes with What”: Reinterpreting the Evidence on Policy Attitude Stability , 2019, The Journal of Politics.

[15]  P. Ditto,et al.  At Least Bias Is Bipartisan: A Meta-Analytic Comparison of Partisan Bias in Liberals and Conservatives , 2017, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[16]  V. Browne.  Political ideologies , 2018, Politics.

[17]  Anne M. Scheel,et al.  Equivalence Testing for Psychological Research: A Tutorial , 2018, Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science.

[18]  Ariel Malka,et al.  The Contingent, Contextual Nature of the Relationship Between Needs for Security and Certainty and Political Preferences: Evidence and Implications , 2018 .

[19]  Adam Wierman,et al.  Thinking Fast and Slow , 2017, SIGMETRICS Perform. Evaluation Rev..

[20]  Catalina E Kopetz,et al.  The Motivation-Cognition Interface : From the Lab to the Real World: A Festschrift in Honor of Arie W. Kruglanski , 2017 .

[21]  Ariel Malka,et al.  Rethinking the Rigidity of the Right Model , 2017 .

[22]  Christine Reyna.  Scale Creation, Use, and Misuse : How Politics Undermines Measurement , 2017 .

[23]  John T. Jost,et al.  The Politics of Fear: Is There an Ideological Asymmetry in Existential Motivation? , 2017 .

[24]  Philip I. Chow,et al.  A Systematic Review of Personality Trait Change Through Intervention , 2017, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  Getting closure on conservatism, or the politics of epistemic and existential motivation , 2017 .

[26]  A. Roets,et al.  The Relationship between Right–wing Attitudes and Cognitive Style: A Comparison of Self–report and Behavioural Measures of Rigidity and Intolerance of Ambiguity , 2016 .

[27]  Gene V. Glass,et al.  Meta‐analysis at middle age: a personal history , 2015, Research synthesis methods.

[28]  Ariel Malka,et al.  Rigidity of the Economic Right? Menu-Independent and Menu-Dependent Influences of Psychological Dispositions on Political Attitudes , 2015 .

[29]  Ellen L Hamaker,et al.  A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. , 2015, Psychological methods.

[30]  E. Charney.  Liberal bias and the five-factor model. , 2015, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[31]  S. Feldman,et al.  Understanding the Determinants of Political Ideology: Implications of Structural Complexity , 2014 .

[32]  M. Bernstein,et al.  You May Think You’re Right … Young Adults Are More Liberal Than They Realize , 2014 .

[33]  D. O. Sears,et al.  The Oxford handbook of political psychology , 2013 .

[34]  J. Jost,et al.  Political ideologies and their social psychological functions , 2013 .

[35]  Daniel C. Dennett,et al.  Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking , 2013 .

[36]  Christopher Ellis,et al.  Ideology in America , 2012 .

[37]  Barbara A Mellers,et al.  Intelligent management of intelligence agencies: beyond accountability ping-pong. , 2011, The American psychologist.

[38]  Joshua Knobe,et al.  Thought experiments. , 2011, Scientific American.

[39]  A. Van Hiel,et al.  The relationship between social-cultural attitudes and behavioral measures of cognitive style: a meta-analytic integration of studies. , 2010, Journal of personality.

[40]  J. Rodgers.  The epistemology of mathematical and statistical modeling: a quiet methodological revolution. , 2010, The American psychologist.

[41]  C. Sibley,et al.  A Dual-Process Motivational Model of Ideology, Politics, and Prejudice , 2009 .

[42]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Disentangling Reasons and Rationalizations: Exploring Perceived Fairness in Hypothetical Societies , 2009 .

[43]  Jaime L. Napier,et al.  Political ideology: its structure, functions, and elective affinities. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[44]  J. Block,et al.  Nursery school personality and political orientation two decades later , 2006 .

[45]  Hugh Rawson,et al.  The Oxford Dictionary of American Quotations , 2005 .

[46]  J. Jost,et al.  Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[47]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Do Frequency Representations Eliminate Conjunction Effects? An Exercise in Adversarial Collaboration , 2001, Psychological science.

[48]  Richard E. Redding,et al.  Sociopolitical diversity in psychology. The case for pluralism. , 2001, The American psychologist.

[49]  H Pashler,et al.  How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing. , 2000, Psychological review.

[50]  D. Kinder,et al.  Opinion and action in the realm of politics. , 1998 .

[51]  J. D. Watson.  Genes and politics , 1997, Journal of Molecular Medicine.

[52]  Thomas H. Lewis,et al.  The Authoritarian Specter , 1997 .

[53]  J. Jost.  Negative illusions: conceptual clarification and psychological evidence concerning false consciousness , 1995 .

[54]  D. Rucinski.  The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. , 1994 .

[55]  Andrew Heywood,et al.  Political Ideologies: An Introduction , 1992 .

[56]  A. FRANKLIN,et al.  Can a Theory-Laden Observation Test the Theory? , 1989, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[57]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Symbolic Racism: Problems of Motive Attribution in Political Analysis , 1986 .

[58]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning , 1986 .

[59]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Stability and change in the complexity of senatorial debate: Testing the cognitive versus rhetorical style hypotheses. , 1984 .

[60]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  Cognitive style and political belief systems in the British House of Commons. , 1984 .

[61]  P. Meehl.  Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. , 1978 .

[62]  Max Kaase,et al.  Political Ideology I , 1974 .

[63]  G. Wilson,et al.  A new measure of conservatism. , 1968, The British journal of social and clinical psychology.

[64]  D. Apter,et al.  Ideology and discontent , 1966 .

[65]  J. Platt.  Strong Inference: Certain systematic methods of scientific thinking may produce much more rapid progress than others. , 1964, Science.

[66]  T. Adorno.  The Authoritarian Personality , 1950 .

[67]  Karl R. Popper,et al.  What is Dialectic , 1940 .