Optimization of Genome Engineering Approaches with the CRISPR/Cas9 System

Designer nucleases such as TALENS and Cas9 have opened new opportunities to scarlessly edit the mammalian genome. Here we explored several parameters that influence Cas9-mediated scarless genome editing efficiency in murine embryonic stem cells. Optimization of transfection conditions and enriching for transfected cells are critical for efficiently recovering modified clones. Paired gRNAs and wild-type Cas9 efficiently create programmed deletions, which facilitate identification of targeted clones, while paired gRNAs and the Cas9D10A nickase generated smaller targeted indels with lower chance of off-target mutagenesis. Genome editing is also useful for programmed introduction of exogenous DNA sequences at a target locus. Increasing the length of the homology arms of the homology-directed repair template strongly enhanced targeting efficiency, while increasing the length of the DNA insert reduced it. Together our data provide guidance on optimal design of scarless gene knockout, modification, or knock-in experiments using Cas9 nuclease.

[1]  George Church,et al.  Optimization of scarless human stem cell genome editing , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[2]  N. Copeland,et al.  A highly efficient recombineering-based method for generating conditional knockout mutations. , 2003, Genome research.

[3]  David A. Scott,et al.  Double Nicking by RNA-Guided CRISPR Cas9 for Enhanced Genome Editing Specificity , 2013, Cell.

[4]  Gang Bao,et al.  Quantifying genome-editing outcomes at endogenous loci with SMRT sequencing. , 2014, Cell reports.

[5]  D. G. Gibson,et al.  Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases , 2009, Nature Methods.

[6]  B. Conklin,et al.  Isolation of single-base genome-edited human iPS cells without antibiotic selection , 2014, Nature Methods.

[7]  James E. DiCarlo,et al.  RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9 , 2013, Science.

[8]  Eli J. Fine,et al.  DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[9]  Erin L. Doyle,et al.  Efficient design and assembly of custom TALEN and other TAL effector-based constructs for DNA targeting , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  Daniel S. Day,et al.  Interrogating translational efficiency and lineage-specific transcriptomes using ribosome affinity purification , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Murim Choi,et al.  De novo mutations in histone modifying genes in congenital heart disease , 2013, Nature.

[12]  Raphael Cohen,et al.  CHILD: a new tool for detecting low-abundance insertions and deletions in standard sequence traces , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[13]  Le Cong,et al.  Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems , 2013, Science.

[14]  V. Iyer,et al.  Efficient genome modification by CRISPR-Cas9 nickase with minimal off-target effects , 2014, Nature Methods.

[15]  Patrick Rodriguez,et al.  Efficient biotinylation and single-step purification of tagged transcription factors in mammalian cells and transgenic mice , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  G. Church,et al.  CAS9 transcriptional activators for target specificity screening and paired nickases for cooperative genome engineering , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[17]  Rudolf Jaenisch,et al.  One-Step Generation of Mice Carrying Mutations in Multiple Genes by CRISPR/Cas-Mediated Genome Engineering , 2013, Cell.