Innovation, Networking and Proximity: Lessons from Small High Technology Firms in the UK

The article explores how the innovative performance of small high-tech firms relates to their external networking activities, and whether geographical proximity in their network relations matters. Data from a small sample of electronics firms and software developers in South East England are used to construct indicators of innovativeness, which are correlated with variables capturing intensity of external interactions and proximity benefits. The regional science base is found to have played a key role in nurturing new high-tech ventures, but science parks had not contributed to this. Interaction with parties with complementary capabilities such as suppliers and service providers is also associated with high innovative performance. However, the findings do not support the current policy fashion of encouraging regional networks revolving around firms in similar business activities and close customer relations.

[1]  Helen Lawton Smith.  Adjusting the roles of national laboratories: some comparisons between UK, French, and Belgian institutions , 1997 .

[2]  D. Archibugi,et al.  Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys , 1996 .

[3]  Robert Huggins,et al.  Local Business Co-operation and Training and Enterprise Councils: The Development of Inter-firm Networks , 1998 .

[4]  M. Hitt,et al.  Technological learning, knowledge management, firm growth and performance: an introductory essay , 2000 .

[5]  John Bessant,et al.  Small firms, R&D, technology and innovation in the UK: a literature review , 1998 .

[6]  D. Garvin.  Building a learning organization. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[7]  P. Cooke,et al.  Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions , 1997 .

[8]  P. Cooke,et al.  The Associational Economy: Firms, Regions, and Innovation , 2000 .

[9]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[10]  Marc Cowling,et al.  Employment change in independent owner-managed high-technology firms in Great Britain , 1995 .

[11]  D. Audretsch.  Agglomeration and the location of innovative activity , 1998 .

[12]  H. Smith,et al.  Knowledge‐complexes and the locus of technological change: the biotechnology sector in Oxfordshire , 2000 .

[13]  Mark Dodgson,et al.  Technology Learning, Technology Strategy and Competitive Pressures , 1991 .

[14]  M. Storper.  Regional ‘Worlds’ of Production: Learning and Innovation in the Technology Districts of France, Italy and the USA , 1993 .

[15]  Syeda-Masooda Mukhtar,et al.  United Kingdom High-Technology Small Firms in Theory and Practice: A Review of Recent Trends , 1999 .

[16]  M. Porter.  The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .