Which manufacturing characteristics are predictors of outlet strut fracture in large sixty-degree Björk-Shiley convexo-concave mitral valves? The Björk-Shiley Study Group.

BACKGROUND Identification of predictors of outlet strut fracture is important for recipients of large (>/=29 mm) 60-degree Björk-Shiley convexo-concave mitral valves when it comes to decision making on prophylactic explantation. An association between the manufacturing process of Björk-Shiley convexo-concave valves and the risk of fracture has been suggested. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine which items from the manufacturing records, in addition to known risk factors, were predictive of fracture of large 60-degree Björk-Shiley convexo-concave mitral valves. METHODS All Dutch recipients (n = 2264) of Björk-Shiley convexo-concave valves were followed up until fracture, death, reoperation, or end of the study (July 1, 1996). Information was abstracted from the manufacturing records of large 60-degree Björk-Shiley convexo- concave mitral valves (n = 655) in Dutch recipients and included items that described the manufacturing process and items for which an association with strut fracture had been suggested. Manufacturing records were available for 637 valves (97%), including 25 fractured valves. RESULTS Multivariate analysis identified age at implantation (hazard ratio 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.93-0.97), lot size (<175 valves versus >/=175 valves; hazard ratio 6.6, 95% confidence interval 2.2-20.1), number of hook deflection tests performed (0 or 1 versus >/=2; hazard ratio 4.7, 95% confidence interval 1.4-16.2), number of disks that were used (1 versus >/=2; hazard ratio 5.9, 95% confidence interval 1.9-18.5), and lot fracture percentage (hazard ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.4-1. 8) as independent predictors of fracture. Although the added predictive value of a model with these 5 variables was sizable compared with a model containing age only, it was only slightly better than a model with age, lot size, and lot fracture percentage. CONCLUSION If the serial number of a large 60-degree Björk-Shiley convexo-concave mitral valve is known, manufacturing information can add significantly to the prediction of fracture. Information on lot size and lot fracture percentage should be made available to clinicians for risk assessment of prophylactic explantation.

[1]  V. Björk,et al.  Mechanical failure of the Björk-Shiley valve. Incidence, clinical presentation, and management. , 1986, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[2]  A. Algra,et al.  Welder identity, weld date, and the risk of outlet strut fracture in Björk-Shiley convexo-concave valves: the Dutch cohort study. , 1996, Heart.

[3]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .

[4]  D. Cox Regression Models and Life-Tables , 1972 .

[5]  Y. Graaf,et al.  Risk of strut fracture of Björk-Shiley valves , 1992, The Lancet.

[6]  James G. Chandler,et al.  Reoperation on prosthetic heart values. Patient-specific estimates of in-hospital events. , 1995, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[7]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[8]  J. Hanley,et al.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. , 1983, Radiology.

[9]  Nancy A. Dreyer,et al.  Patient Factors Associated With Strut Fracture in Björk-Shiley 60° Convexo-Concave Heart Valves , 1995 .

[10]  H. Scully,et al.  Strut fracture with Björk-Shiley 70 degrees convexo-concave valve. An international multi-institutional follow-up study. , 1992, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[11]  Y. Graaf,et al.  Single-leg strut fractures in explanted Björk-Shiley valves , 1994, The Lancet.

[12]  J W Martin,et al.  Metallurgical analysis of failed Björk-Shiley cardiac valve prostheses. , 1986, Thorax.

[13]  Hugh E. Scully,et al.  Outlet strut fracture of the Björk-Shiley 60 ° Convexo-Concave valve: Current information and recommendations for patient care , 1988 .

[14]  C. Olin,et al.  The Björk-Shiley 70 degree convexo-concave prosthesis strut fracture problem (present state of information). , 1987, The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon.

[15]  N. Dreyer,et al.  Manufacturing characteristics associated with strut fracture in Björk-Shiley 60 degrees Convexo-Concave heart valves. , 1995, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[16]  J H Fielder Getting the bad news about your artificial heart valve. , 1993, The Hastings Center report.

[17]  W. Blot,et al.  Shop order fracture rate as a risk factor for strut fracture in Björk-Shiley CC60 degrees heart valves. , 1997, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[18]  A Starr,et al.  Actuarial versus actual risk of porcine structural valve deterioration. , 1994, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.