Surnames and dialects in France: population structure and cultural evolution.

To study the isonymy structure of France as related to local language variations, the surname distributions of 6.03 million telephone users registered for the year 2002 were analysed in the 21 conterminous regions, their 94 departments and in 809 towns of the Country. For regions and departments the differences among local dialects were quantified according to the dialecto-metrization of the Atlas Linguistique Français. We found that Lasker's distance between regions was correlated with geographic distance with r=0.692+/-0.040, while Euclidean (r=0.546+/-0.058) and Nei's (r=0.610+/-0.048) distances were less correlated. Slightly lower correlations were observed for departments. Also, dialectometric distance was correlated with geography (r=0.582+/-0.069 for regions and r=0.617+/-0.015 for departments). The correlations between Lasker and dialectometric matrix distances for regions and departments are r=0.625+/-0.046 and 0.544+/-0.014, respectively, indicating that the common cause generating surname and language diversity accounts for about 35% of the differentiation. Both Lasker and dialectometric distances identify very similar boundaries between Poitou, Centre, Bourgogne and Franche Comptée at the North, and Aquitaine, Limousin, Auvergne, Rhône-Alpes in the South. Average Fisher's alpha for France was 7877 the highest value observed for the European countries studied to date. The size of alpha in most French towns indicates considerable recent immigration.

[1]  I. Barrai,et al.  Isonymy and the genetic structure of Switzerland. I. The distributions of surnames. , 1996, Annals of human biology.

[2]  I. Barrai,et al.  Isolation by Language and Distance in Belgium , 2004, Annals of human genetics.

[3]  I. Barrai,et al.  Isolation by distance in Germany , 1997, Human Genetics.

[4]  M. Vernay Trends in inbreeding, isonymy, and repeated pairs of surnames in the Valserine Valley, French Jura, 1763-1972. , 2000, Human Biology: The Official Publication of the American Association of Anthropological Genetics.

[5]  C. Stoll,et al.  Parental consanguinity as a cause of increased incidence of birth defects in a study of 131,760 consecutive births. , 1994, American journal of medical genetics.

[6]  J. Sutter Fréquence de l'endogamie et ses facteurs au XIXe siècle , 1968 .

[7]  J. Fleury Recherches historiques sur les empêchements de parenté dans le mariage canonique des origines aux fausses décrétales , 1933 .

[8]  Masatoshi Nei,et al.  Genetic structure of human populations II. Differentiation of blood group gene frequencies among isolated populations1 , 1966, Heredity.

[9]  Hans Goebl,et al.  Dialectometry: A Short Overview of the Principles and Practice of Quantitative Classification of Linguistic Atlas Data , 1993 .

[10]  R. Fisher,et al.  The Relation Between the Number of Species and the Number of Individuals in a Random Sample of an Animal Population , 1943 .

[11]  J. Sutter,et al.  Evolution de la consanguinité en France de 1926 à 1958 avec des données récentes détaillées. , 1962 .

[12]  I. Barrai,et al.  Isonymy and the genetic structure of Switzerland. II. Isolation by distance. , 1998, Annals of human biology.

[13]  J. Hochez,et al.  Surname distribution in France: a distance analysis by a distorted geographical map. , 1995, Annals of human biology.

[14]  P. Francalacci,et al.  SURNAME ANALYSIS OF THE CORSICAN POPULATION REVEALS AN AGREEMENT WITH GEOGRAPHICAL AND LINGUISTIC STRUCTURE , 2002, Journal of Biosocial Science.

[15]  J. Relethford Estimation of kinship and genetic distance from surnames. , 1988, Human biology.

[16]  J. McGregor,et al.  The number of mutant forms maintained in a population , 1967 .

[17]  A. Rogers Doubts about isonymy. , 1991, Human biology.

[18]  S WRIGHT,et al.  Genetical structure of populations. , 1950, Nature.

[19]  A. Jacquard,et al.  Inbreeding: one word, several meanings. , 1975, Theoretical population biology.

[20]  L. Cavalli-Sforza Genes, peoples and languages. , 1991, Scientific American.

[21]  K. Mather Genetical structure of populations , 1973 .

[22]  W. R. Fox,et al.  The Distribution of Surname Frequencies , 1983 .

[23]  J. Vernay The distribution and geographical origin of some French surnames , 2000, Annals of human biology.

[24]  L. Tabah,et al.  Fréquence et répartition des mariages consanguins en France , 1948 .

[25]  Franz Manni,et al.  Isonymy and Isolation by Distance in the Netherlands , 2002, Human biology.

[26]  E. Crognier Consanguinity and social change: an isonymic study of a French Peasant Population, 1870–1979 , 1985, Journal of Biosocial Science.

[27]  I. Barrai,et al.  Isonymy structure of USA population. , 2001, American journal of physical anthropology.

[28]  S. Wright,et al.  Isolation by Distance. , 1943, Genetics.

[29]  I. Barrai,et al.  Elements of the surname structure of Austria. , 2000, Annals of human biology.

[30]  J. Crow,et al.  Measurement of inbreeding from the frequency of marriages between persons of the same surname. , 1965, Eugenics quarterly.

[31]  John A. Byers,et al.  Dirichlet tessellation of bark beetle spatial attack points. , 1992 .

[32]  Hans Goebl Regards dialectométriques sur les donées de l'"Atlas linguistique de la France" (ALF): Relations quantitatives et structures de profondeur , 2003 .

[33]  Relationships between consanguinity and migration rate from surname distributions and isonymy in France. , 1992, Annals of human biology.

[34]  G. Lasker,et al.  Use of Surname Models in Human Population Biology: A Review of Recent Developments , 2003, Human biology.

[35]  M. Nei,et al.  Genetic structure of human populations I. Local differentiation of blood group gene frequencies in Japan1 , 1966, Heredity.

[36]  I. Barrai,et al.  The names of Spain: a study of the isonymy structure of Spain. , 2003, American journal of physical anthropology.

[37]  A Piazza,et al.  Genetic and linguistic evolution. , 1989, Science.

[38]  R. Sokal,et al.  Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the mantel test of matrix correspondence , 1986 .

[39]  Hans Goebl,et al.  Dialektometrische Studien. anhand italoromanischer, rätoromanischer und galloromanischer Sprachmaterialien aus AIS und ALF. 3 Bände , 1984 .

[40]  G. Lasker A coefficient of relationship by isonymy: a method for estimating the genetic relationship between populations. , 1977, Human biology.

[41]  Correct Calculation of Dirichlet Polygon Areas , 1996 .

[42]  L. Cavalli-Sforza,et al.  PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS: MODELS AND ESTIMATION PROCEDURES , 1967, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[43]  I. Barrai,et al.  Isonymy and isolation by distance in Italy. , 1999, Human biology.

[44]  L. Tabah,et al.  L'évolution des isolats de deux départements français : Loir-et-Cher, Finistère , 1955 .

[45]  A. Munnich,et al.  A high rate (20%-30%) of parental consanguinity in cytochrome-oxidase deficiency. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[46]  Hans Goebl La dialectométrisation de l’alf: presentation des premiers résultats , 2000, Linguistica.

[47]  J. Dipierri,et al.  Surnames in Argentina: a population study through isonymy. , 2005, American journal of physical anthropology.

[48]  I. Barrai,et al.  Surname frequency and the isonymy structure of Venezuela , 2000, American Journal of Human Biology.

[49]  J. Feingold,et al.  Inbreeding in recessive diseases , 1977, Human Genetics.

[50]  I. Barrai,et al.  Isonymy and isolation by distance in Germany. , 1998, Human biology.