CuBlock: a cross-platform normalization method for gene-expression microarrays

Motivation Cross-(multi)platform normalization of gene-expression microarray data remains an unresolved issue. Despite the existence of several algorithms, they are either constrained by the need to normalize all samples of all platforms together, compromising scalability and reuse, by adherence to the platforms of a specific provider, or simply by poor performance. In addition, many of the methods presented in the literature have not been specifically tested against multi-platform data and/or other methods applicable in this context. Thus, we set out to develop a normalization algorithm appropriate for gene-expression studies based on multiple, potentially large microarray sets collected along multiple platforms and at different times, applicable in systematic studies aimed at extracting knowledge from the wealth of microarray data available in public repositories; for example, for the extraction of Real-World Data to complement data from Randomized Controlled Trials. Our main focus or criterion for performance was on the capacity of the algorithm to properly separate samples from different biological groups. Results We present CuBlock, an algorithm addressing this objective, together with a strategy to validate cross-platform normalization methods. To validate the algorithm and benchmark it against existing methods, we used two distinct data sets, one specifically generated for testing and standardization purposes and one from an actual experimental study. Using these data sets, we benchmarked CuBlock against ComBat (Johnson et al., 2007), YuGene (Lê Cao et al., 2014), DBNorm (Meng et al., 2017), Shambhala (Borisov et al., 2019) and a simple log2 transform as reference. We note that many other popular normalization methods are not applicable in this context. CuBlock was the only algorithm in this group that could always and clearly differentiate the underlying biological groups after mixing the data, from up to six different platforms in this study. Availability CuBlock can be downloaded from https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/77882-cublock Contact xouse@anaxomics.com, xavier.daura@uab.cat Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at bioRxiv online.

[1]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Quantitative Monitoring of Gene Expression Patterns with a Complementary DNA Microarray , 1995, Science.

[2]  David Madigan,et al.  Good practices for real‐world data studies of treatment and/or comparative effectiveness: Recommendations from the joint ISPOR‐ISPE Special Task Force on real‐world evidence in health care decision making , 2017, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[3]  Sabri Boughorbel,et al.  Optimal classifier for imbalanced data using Matthews Correlation Coefficient metric , 2017, PloS one.

[4]  P. Brown,et al.  Yeast microarrays for genome wide parallel genetic and gene expression analysis. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  M. Gerstein,et al.  The Transcriptional Landscape of the Yeast Genome Defined by RNA Sequencing , 2008, Science.

[6]  Roger E Bumgarner Overview of DNA microarrays: types, applications, and their future. , 2013, Current protocols in molecular biology.

[7]  Maqc Consortium The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project shows inter- and intraplatform reproducibility of gene expression measurements , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[8]  Octavio Caba,et al.  Integrative multi-platform meta-analysis of gene expression profiles in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients for identifying novel diagnostic biomarkers , 2017, PloS one.

[9]  Andrew B. Nobel,et al.  Merging two gene-expression studies via cross-platform normalization , 2008, Bioinform..

[10]  S. P. Lloyd,et al.  Least squares quantization in PCM , 1982, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[11]  Juan Carlos Fernández,et al.  Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms to identify highly autocorrelated areas: the case of spatial distribution in financially compromised farms , 2014, Ann. Oper. Res..

[12]  Hanlee P. Ji,et al.  The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project shows inter- and intraplatform reproducibility of gene expression measurements. , 2006, Nature biotechnology.

[13]  John D. Storey A direct approach to false discovery rates , 2002 .

[14]  Pingzhao Hu,et al.  Microarray Meta-Analysis and Cross-Platform Normalization: Integrative Genomics for Robust Biomarker Discovery , 2015, Microarrays.

[15]  Joel S. Parker,et al.  Adjustment of systematic microarray data biases , 2004, Bioinform..

[16]  Hidetoshi Shimodaira,et al.  Approximately unbiased tests of regions using multistep-multiscale bootstrap resampling , 2004, math/0508602.

[17]  Faramarz Valafar,et al.  Empirical comparison of cross-platform normalization methods for gene expression data , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[18]  Stephen A Krawetz,et al.  Success and failure in human spermatogenesis as revealed by teratozoospermic RNAs. , 2007, Human molecular genetics.

[19]  C. Wells,et al.  YuGene: a simple approach to scale gene expression data derived from different platforms for integrated analyses. , 2014, Genomics.

[20]  Stephen R. Piccolo,et al.  A single-sample microarray normalization method to facilitate personalized-medicine workflows. , 2012, Genomics.

[21]  Nicolas Borisov,et al.  Shambhala: a platform-agnostic data harmonizer for gene expression data , 2019, BMC Bioinformatics.

[22]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Visualizing Data using t-SNE , 2008 .

[23]  Cheng Li,et al.  Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods. , 2007, Biostatistics.

[24]  Patrick Ryan,et al.  Feasibility of Using Real-World Data to Replicate Clinical Trial Evidence , 2019, JAMA network open.

[25]  P. Rousseeuw Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis , 1987 .

[26]  Robert M. Califf,et al.  Accelerating development of scientific evidence for medical products within the existing US regulatory framework , 2017, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[27]  Hidetoshi Shimodaira,et al.  Pvclust: an R package for assessing the uncertainty in hierarchical clustering , 2006, Bioinform..

[28]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  An introduction to ROC analysis , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[29]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[30]  David P. Kreil,et al.  A comprehensive assessment of RNA-seq accuracy, reproducibility and information content by the Sequencing Quality Control consortium , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[31]  David B. Skillicorn,et al.  DBNorm: normalizing high-density oligonucleotide microarray data based on distributions , 2017, BMC Bioinformatics.