Balancing Curricular and Pedagogical Needs in Computational Construction Kits: Lessons from the DeltaTick Project.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Aditi Wagh | Uri Wilensky | Michelle Hoda Wilkerson-Jerde | U. Wilensky | Aditi Wagh | Michelle Wilkerson
[1] S. Papert. The children's machine: rethinking school in the age of the computer , 1993 .
[2] Kathleen E. Metz. Scaffolding children's understanding of the fit between organisms and their environment in the context of the practices of science , 2010, ICLS.
[3] Alexander Repenning,et al. The simulation creation toolkit: an initial exploration into making programming accessible while preserving computational thinking , 2013, SIGCSE '13.
[4] Andrea A. diSessa,et al. Relations between Types of Reasoning and Computational Representations , 2004, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..
[5] R Noss,et al. The Co-ordination of Meanings for Randomness , 1998 .
[6] Uri Wilensky,et al. Statistical Mechanics for Secondary School: The GasLab Multi-agent Modeling Toolkit , 2003, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..
[7] Ken Kahn. Building computer models from small pieces , 2007, SCSC.
[8] David H. Jonassen,et al. Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology : A Project of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology , 1996 .
[9] David Hammer,et al. Attending and Responding to Student Thinking in Science , 2012 .
[10] Michael Barnett,et al. The impact of three‐dimensional computational modeling on student understanding of astronomical concepts: a quantitative analysis , 2004 .
[11] Martin A. Simon. Reconstructing Mathematics Pedagogy from a Constructivist Perspective. , 1995 .
[12] Brian Harvey,et al. Bringing "No Ceiling" to Scratch: Can One Language Serve Kids and Computer Scientists? , 2010 .
[13] David Hammer,et al. Discovery Learning and Discovery Teaching , 1997 .
[14] James MaKinster,et al. The impact of three‐dimensional computational modeling on student understanding of astronomy concepts: a qualitative analysis , 2004 .
[15] Ravit Golan Duncan,et al. A Learning Progression for Deepening Students' Understandings of Modern Genetics across the 5th-10th Grades. , 2009 .
[16] J. Frederiksen,et al. A Theoretical Framework and Approach for Fostering Metacognitive Development , 2005 .
[17] Jeanne Bamberger,et al. Turning music theory on its ear Do we hear what we see; Do we see what we say? , 1996, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..
[18] Kathleen E. Metz. On the Complex Relation Between Cognitive Developmental Research and Children’s Science Curricula , 1997 .
[19] Wouter R. van Joolingen,et al. Students' reasoning during modeling in an inquiry learning environment , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[20] Nora H. Sabelli,et al. Complexity, Technology, Science, and Education , 2006 .
[21] Zacharias C. Zacharia,et al. Modeling-based learning in science education: cognitive, metacognitive, social, material and epistemological contributions , 2012 .
[22] Alan H. Schoenfeld,et al. Democratizing Access to Calculus: New Routes to Old Roots , 2016 .
[23] E. Ackermann. Piaget ’ s Constructivism , Papert ’ s Constructionism : What ’ s the difference ? , 2001 .
[24] Ngss Lead States. Next generation science standards : for states, by states , 2013 .
[25] Alexander Repenning,et al. Agentsheets: A Medium for Creating Domain-Oriented Languages , 1995, Computer.
[26] Brian Gravel,et al. SiMSAM: An Integrated Toolkit to Bridge Student, Scientific, and Mathematical Ideas Using Computational Media , 2013, International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning.
[27] Paulo Blikstein. An atom is known by the company it keeps: a constructionist learning environment for Materials Science using multi-agent simulation , 2006 .
[28] Yael Kali,et al. Technology-Enhanced Support Strategies for Inquiry Learning , 2007 .
[29] Joseph Krajcik,et al. An Investigation of Software Scaffolds Supporting Modeling Practices , 2002 .
[30] Aesop,et al. 伊索寓言 : 英漢對照文學讀物 = Aesop's fables , 1959 .
[31] Susan A. Yoon,et al. Teaching Complex Dynamic Systems to Young Students with StarLogo , 2005 .
[32] L. Schauble,et al. Design Experiments in Educational Research , 2003 .
[33] Leema K. Berland,et al. Making sense of argumentation and explanation , 2009 .
[34] G. Roland,et al. Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1999 .
[35] Marina Umaschi Bers,et al. Tangible programming in early childhood: Revisiting developmental assumptions through new technologies: Childhood in a digital world , 2009 .
[36] Allan Collins,et al. Design Research: Theoretical and Methodological Issues , 2004 .
[37] Mark Windschitl,et al. Supporting the development of science inquiry skills with special classes of software , 2000 .
[38] Elwin R. Savelsbergh,et al. The effect of external representation on constructing computer models of complex phenomena , 2003 .
[39] David Hammer,et al. Novice Teachers' Attention to Student Thinking , 2009 .
[40] Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al. Understanding Complex Systems: Some Core Challenges , 2006 .
[41] Ton de Jong,et al. Modeling and Simulation in Inquiry Learning: Checking Solutions and Giving Intelligent Advice , 2006, Simul..
[42] Hyman Bass,et al. Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. , 2000 .
[43] David Hammer,et al. Dynaturtle Revisited: Learning Physics Through Collaborative Design of a Computer Model , 1993, Interact. Learn. Environ..
[44] Ton de Jong,et al. Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains , 1998 .
[45] Eric Rosenbaum,et al. Scratch: programming for all , 2009, Commun. ACM.
[46] Andrea A. diSessa. OPEN TOOLSETS: NEW ENDS , 1997 .
[47] C. Hoyles,et al. The Construction of Mathematical Meanings: Connecting the Visual with the Symbolic , 1997 .
[48] Michael J. Baker,et al. The Role of Communication in Learning To Model , 2013 .
[49] David Hammer,et al. Students’ Framings and Their Participation in Scientific Argumentation , 2012 .
[50] Murat Akkuş. The Common Core State Standards for Mathematics , 2015 .
[51] F. S.,et al. Science Education , 1958, Nature.
[52] Enoch Hunsaker,et al. Integrating Computational Thinking , 2016 .
[53] Michele W. Spitulnik,et al. Teacher Use of Evidence to Customize Inquiry Science Instruction. , 2010 .
[54] Andrea A. diSessa,et al. Changing Minds: Computers, Learning, and Literacy , 2000 .
[55] Ricki Goldman,et al. Conducting Video Research in the Learning Sciences: Guidance on Selection, Analysis, Technology, and Ethics , 2010 .
[56] John K. Gilbert,et al. Visualization in science education , 2005 .
[57] Marcia C. Linn,et al. WISE Inquiry in Fifth Grade Biology , 2002 .
[58] Daniel C. Edelson. Learning-for-use : A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities , 2001 .
[59] Robert L. Goldstone,et al. Please Scroll down for Article Journal of the Learning Sciences Promoting Transfer by Grounding Complex Systems Principles , 2022 .
[60] Forrest Stonedahl,et al. MAgICS: Toward a multiagent introduction to computer science , 2010 .
[61] Z. C. Zacharia,et al. Comparing and combining real and virtual experimentation: an effort to enhance students' conceptual understanding of electric circuits , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[62] Karen Gallas,et al. Talking their way into science : hearing children's questions and theories, responding with curricula , 1995 .
[63] Stephanie B. Corliss,et al. Professional Development for Technology-Enhanced Inquiry Science , 2011 .
[64] Harold Abelson,et al. Boxer: a reconstructible computational medium , 1986, CACM.
[65] Helen R. Quinn,et al. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2013 .
[66] Gautam Biswas,et al. Integrating computational thinking with K-12 science education using agent-based computation: A theoretical framework , 2013, Education and Information Technologies.
[67] Kenneth M. Kahn,et al. ToonTalk - An Animated Programming Environment for Children , 1996, J. Vis. Lang. Comput..
[68] U. Wilensky,et al. Thinking Like a Wolf, a Sheep, or a Firefly: Learning Biology Through Constructing and Testing Computational Theories—An Embodied Modeling Approach , 2006 .
[69] Samia Khan,et al. The case in case-based design of educational software: A methodological interrogation , 2008 .
[70] Marko Pfeifer. Multi Agent Systems For Education And Interactive Entertainment Design Use And Experience , 2016 .
[71] Cynthia Passmore,et al. The Use of an Agent-Based Programmable Modeling Tool in 8th Grade Students’ Model-Based Inquiry , 2010 .
[72] Jeannette M. Wing. An introduction to computer science for non-majors using principles of computation , 2007, SIGCSE.
[73] R. Sawyer. The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences: Introduction , 2014 .
[74] Jonathan M. Borwein,et al. Exploratory Experimentation and Computation , 2011 .
[75] P. L. Adams. THE ORIGINS OF INTELLIGENCE IN CHILDREN , 1976 .
[76] H. Schweingruber,et al. TAKING SCIENCE TO SCHOOL: LEARNING AND TEACHING SCIENCE IN GRADES K-8 , 2007 .
[77] U. Wilensky. Paradox, programming, and learning probability: A case study in a connected mathematics framework , 1995 .
[78] Abbie Brown,et al. Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in c , 1992 .
[79] David A. Gillam,et al. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2012 .
[80] Michelle Hoda Wilkerson-Jerde,et al. Restructuring Change, Interpreting Changes: The DeltaTick Modeling and Analysis Toolkit , 2010 .
[81] David Canfield Smith,et al. Programming by example: novice programming comes of age , 2000, CACM.
[82] Bruce L. Sherin,et al. A Comparison of Programming Languages and Algebraic Notation as Expressive Languages for Physics , 2001, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..
[83] Celia Hoyles,et al. Designing a programming-based approach for modelling scientific phenomena , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[84] Paulo Blikstein,et al. An Atom is Known by the Company it Keeps: A Constructionist Learning Environment for Materials Science Using Agent-Based Modeling , 2009, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..
[85] Kurt VanLehn,et al. Model construction as a learning activity: a design space and review , 2013, Interact. Learn. Environ..
[86] Seymour Papert,et al. Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .
[87] Eve Manz,et al. Understanding the codevelopment of modeling practice and ecological knowledge , 2012 .
[88] Chronis Kynigos,et al. Half-Baked Logo Microworlds as Boundary Objects in Integrated Design , 2007, Informatics Educ..
[89] Uta Berger,et al. Pattern-Oriented Modeling of Agent-Based Complex Systems: Lessons from Ecology , 2005, Science.
[90] David Weintrop,et al. Robobuilder: a computational thinking game (abstract only) , 2013, SIGCSE '13.
[91] Helen M. Doerr,et al. Stella ten years later: A review of the literature , 1996, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..
[92] Matthew J. Koehler,et al. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge , 2006, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.
[93] J. Dewey. The Relation of Theory to Practice in Education. , 1904, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.
[94] Constantinos P. Constantinou,et al. Objects, Entities, Behaviors, and Interactions: A Typology of Student-Constructed Computer-Based Models of Physical Phenomena , 2011 .
[95] Lars Bollen,et al. SimSketch: Multiagent Simulations Based on Learner-Created Sketches for Early Science Education , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.
[96] Susan H. Rodger,et al. Engaging middle school teachers and students with alice in a diverse set of subjects , 2009, SIGCSE '09.
[97] Zacharias C. Zacharia,et al. The Use of Computer‐based Programming Environments as Computer Modelling Tools in Early Science Education: The cases of textual and graphical program languages , 2008 .
[98] Edith Ackermann,et al. Perspective-Taking and Object Construction: Two Keys to Learning , 2012 .
[99] S. Tisue. NetLogo : Design and Implementation of a Multi-Agent Modeling Environment , 2004 .
[100] M. G. Sherin,et al. Using Video to Support Teachers’ Ability to Notice Classroom Interactions , 2005 .
[101] T. P. Carpenter,et al. Using Knowledge of Children’s Mathematics Thinking in Classroom Teaching: An Experimental Study , 1989 .
[102] Celia Hoyles,et al. Mathematics education and technology-rethinking the terrain : the 17th ICMI study , 2009 .
[103] Resnick,et al. Programming for All , 2009 .
[104] Douglas N. Gordin,et al. Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. , 2000, The Future of children.
[105] Helen M. Doerr,et al. What Knowledge Do Teachers Need for Teaching Mathematics Through Applications and Modelling , 2007 .
[106] Michael S. Horn,et al. Tangible programming in the classroom with tern , 2007, CHI Extended Abstracts.
[107] M. Resnick,et al. Thinking in Levels: A Dynamic Systems Approach to Making Sense of the World , 1999 .
[108] Christine Nadel,et al. Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .
[109] Constantinos P. Constantinou,et al. In Quest of Productive Modeling-Based Learning Discourse in Elementary School Science , 2011 .
[110] Philip J Cowen,et al. Constructionism , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[111] Brian C. Nelson,et al. A multi-user virtual environment for building and assessing higher order inquiry skills in science , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..
[112] Kathleen Hogan,et al. Cognitive Comparisons of Students' Systems Modeling in Ecology , 2001 .