Providing metrics and performance feedback in a surgical simulator

One of the most important advantages of computer simulators for surgical training is the opportunity they afford for independent learning. However, if the simulator does not provide useful instructional feedback to the user, this advantage is significantly blunted by the need for an instructor to supervise and tutor the trainee while using the simulator. Thus, the incorporation of relevant, intuitive metrics is essential to the development of efficient simulators. Equally as important is the presentation of such metrics to the user in such a way so as to provide constructive feedback that facilitates independent learning and improvement. This paper presents a number of novel metrics for the automated evaluation of surgical technique. The general approach was to take criteria that are intuitive to surgeons and develop ways to quantify them in a simulator. Although many of the concepts behind these metrics have wide application throughout surgery, they have been implemented specifically in the context of a simulation of mastoidectomy. First, the visuohaptic simulator itself is described, followed by the details of a wide variety of metrics designed to assess the user's performance. We present mechanisms for presenting visualizations and other feedback based on these metrics during a virtual procedure. We further describe a novel performance evaluation console that displays metric-based information during an automated debriefing session. Finally, the results of several user studies are reported, providing some preliminary validation of the simulator, the metrics, and the feedback mechanisms. Several machine learning algorithms, including Hidden Markov Models and a Naïve Bayes Classifier, are applied to our simulator data to automatically differentiate users’ expertise levels.

[1]  R. Reznick,et al.  Assessing competency in surgery: where to begin? , 2004, Surgery.

[2]  Dan Morris Algorithms and Data Structures for Haptic Rendering: Curve Constraints, Distance Maps, and Data Logging , 2007 .

[3]  A. Gallagher,et al.  Real-Time Objective Assessment of Knot Quality With a Portable Tensiometer Is Superior to Execution Time for Assessment of Laparoscopic Knot-Tying Performance , 2005, Surgical innovation.

[4]  Rajesh Aggarwal,et al.  Laparoscopic task recognition using Hidden Markov Models. , 2005, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[5]  Gábor Székely,et al.  Objective Surgical Performance Assessment for Virtual Hysteroscopy , 2007, MMVR.

[6]  Jacob Rosen,et al.  Data mining of the E-pelvis simulator database: a quest for a generalized algorithm for objectively assessing medical skill. , 2006, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[7]  L. Carlton,et al.  Information feedback and the learning multiple-degree-of-freedom activities. , 1992, Journal of motor behavior.

[8]  K. Höhne,et al.  Volume Cutting for Virtual Petrous Bone Surgery , 2002, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[9]  L. Baum,et al.  An inequality with applications to statistical estimation for probabilistic functions of Markov processes and to a model for ecology , 1967 .

[10]  Glenn Regehr,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of a 2-year curriculum in a surgical skills center. , 2003, American journal of surgery.

[11]  Gregory J. Wiet,et al.  Virtual temporal bone dissection: a case study , 2001, Proceedings Visualization, 2001. VIS '01..

[12]  Dan Morris,et al.  Quantifying risky behavior in surgical simulation. , 2005, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[13]  E. Gates,et al.  New surgical procedures: can our patients benefit while we learn? , 1997, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  S. Panchanathan,et al.  1 Documenting Motion Sequences : Development of a Personalized Annotation System , 2004 .

[15]  Gerard Jounghyun Kim,et al.  Implementation and Evaluation of Just Follow Me: An Immersive, VR-Based, Motion-Training System , 2002, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[16]  Hans-Peter Kriegel,et al.  Stable Haptic Interaction with Virtual Environments Using and Adapted Voxmap-PointShell Algorithm , 2001 .

[17]  Dan Morris,et al.  Achieving proper exposure in surgical simulation. , 2006, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[18]  M. Bridges,et al.  The financial impact of teaching surgical residents in the operating room. , 1999, American journal of surgery.

[19]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  Visuohaptic simulation of bone surgery for training and evaluation , 2006, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[20]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. , 1990 .

[21]  Simon Paterson-Brown,et al.  Accuracy of medical staff assessment of trainees’ operative performance , 2005, Medical teacher.

[22]  Sethuraman Panchanathan,et al.  Documenting motion sequences with a personalized annotation system , 2006, IEEE Multimedia.

[23]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Markov modeling of minimally invasive surgery based on tool/tissue interaction and force/torque signatures for evaluating surgical skills , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  Karl Heinz Höhne,et al.  Haptic volume interaction with anatomic models at sub-voxel resolution , 2002, Proceedings 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. HAPTICS 2002.

[25]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  Haptic Feedback Enhances Force Skill Learning , 2007, Second Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (WHC'07).

[26]  Andrea Giachetti,et al.  A multiprocessor decoupled system for the simulation of temporal bone surgery , 2002 .

[27]  L. Baum,et al.  A Maximization Technique Occurring in the Statistical Analysis of Probabilistic Functions of Markov Chains , 1970 .

[28]  Tomohiro Kuroda,et al.  A Novel Approach for Training of Surgical Procedures Based on Visualization and Annotation of Behavioural Parameters in Simulators , 2007, MMVR.

[29]  Constantin F. Aliferis,et al.  Studies in Health Technology and Informatics , 2007 .

[30]  Andrea Giachetti,et al.  Physics-based burr haptic simulation: tuning and evaluation , 2004, 12th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 2004. HAPTICS '04. Proceedings..

[31]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  Evaluating Drilling and Suctioning Technique in a Mastoidectomy Simulator , 2007, MMVR.

[32]  R. Reznick,et al.  Testing technical skill via an innovative "bench station" examination. , 1997, American journal of surgery.

[33]  Stephane Cotin,et al.  Metrics for Laparoscopic Skills Trainers: The Weakest Link! , 2002, MICCAI.

[34]  Frank Tendick,et al.  Haptic guidance: experimental evaluation of a haptic training method for a perceptual motor skill , 2002, Proceedings 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. HAPTICS 2002.

[35]  Carla M. Pugh,et al.  Developing Performance Criteria for the e-Pelvis Simulator Using Visual Analysis , 2007, MMVR.