Technical accuracy of optical and the electromagnetic tracking systems

Thousands of operations are annually guided with computer assisted surgery (CAS) technologies. As the use of these devices is rapidly increasing, the reliability of the devices becomes ever more critical. The problem of accuracy assessment of the devices has thus become relevant. During the past five years, over 200 hazardous situations have been documented in the MAUDE database during operations using these devices in the field of neurosurgery alone. Had the accuracy of these devices been periodically assessed pre-operatively, many of them might have been prevented.The technical accuracy of a commercial navigator enabling the use of both optical (OTS) and electromagnetic (EMTS) tracking systems was assessed in the hospital setting using accuracy assessment tools and methods developed by the authors of this paper. The technical accuracy was obtained by comparing the positions of the navigated tool tip with the phantom accuracy assessment points. Each assessment contained a total of 51 points and a region of surgical interest (ROSI) volume of 120x120x100 mm roughly mimicking the size of the human head.The error analysis provided a comprehensive understanding of the trend of accuracy of the surgical navigator modalities. This study showed that the technical accuracies of OTS and EMTS over the pre-determined ROSI were nearly equal. However, the placement of the particular modality hardware needs to be optimized for the surgical procedure. New applications of EMTS, which does not require rigid immobilization of the surgical area, are suggested.

[1]  R. Ellis,et al.  A Process Control System Model for Interactive Image Guided Surgery , 2008, 2008 2nd Annual IEEE Systems Conference.

[2]  Ben J Slotman,et al.  The accuracy of frameless stereotactic intracranial radiosurgery. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[3]  D. A. Simon Intra-Operative Position Sensing and Tracking Devices , 1998 .

[4]  Jani P. A. Katisko,et al.  Registration in interventional procedures with optical navigator , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  J. Katisko Intraoperative imaging guided delineation and localization of regions of surgical interest : feasibility study , 2012 .

[6]  Anthony M. DiGioia,et al.  Navigation and MIS in Orthopedic Surgery , 2007 .

[7]  Gerlig Widmann,et al.  Frameless stereotactic targeting devices: technical features, targeting errors and clinical results , 2012, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[8]  Tim Lüth,et al.  Official measurement protocol and accuracy results for an optical surgical navigation system (NPU) , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[9]  Wolfgang Birkfellner,et al.  Calibration of tracking systems in a surgical environment , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Robert L. Galloway,et al.  Medical Imaging 2004: Visualization, Image-Guided Procedures, and Display, San Diego, California, United States, 14-19 February 2004 , 2004, Medical Imaging: Image-Guided Procedures.

[11]  Mark Schneider,et al.  Development and testing of a new magnetic-tracking device for image guidance , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[12]  P Haigron,et al.  Electromagnetic tracking for registration and navigation in endovascular aneurysm repair: a phantom study. , 2012, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[13]  Jocelyne Troccaz,et al.  CVRMed-MRCAS'97 : First Joint Conference Computer Vision, Virtual Reality and Robotics in Medicine and Medical Robotics and Computer-Assisted Surgery Grenoble, France, March 19-22, 1997, proceedings , 1997 .

[14]  Paul R. Cohen,et al.  Camera Calibration with Distortion Models and Accuracy Evaluation , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[15]  J. Karhu,et al.  Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2010, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[16]  Matteo Zoppi,et al.  Toward lean minimally invasive robotic surgery , 2009, Robotica.

[17]  G Kronreif,et al.  Evaluation of robotic assistance in neurosurgical applications , 2011, Journal of Robotic Surgery.

[18]  Jyrki Alakuijala,et al.  Algorithms for modeling anatomic and target volumes in image-guided neurosurgery and radiotherapy , 2002 .

[19]  Guang-Zhong Yang,et al.  Freehand Cocalibration of Optical and Electromagnetic Trackers for Navigated Bronchoscopy , 2004, MIAR.

[20]  Bernhard Meyer,et al.  VARIOGUIDE: A NEW FRAMELESS IMAGE‐GUIDED STEREOTACTIC SYSTEM—ACCURACY STUDY AND CLINICAL ASSESSMENT , 2009, Neurosurgery.

[21]  Andrew D. Wiles,et al.  Accuracy assessment and interpretation for optical tracking systems , 2004, Medical Imaging: Image-Guided Procedures.

[22]  Tapani Koivukangas,et al.  Methods for determination of the accuracy of surgical guidance devices : a study in the region of neurosurgical interest , 2012 .

[23]  M. Donat,et al.  Stability of miniature electromagnetic tracking systems. , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  Y. Matsuoka,et al.  Robotics for surgery. , 1999, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[25]  M. Figl,et al.  Evaluation of a new electromagnetic tracking system using a standardized assessment protocol , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  Peter Kazanzides,et al.  The Importance of Accuracy Measurement Standards for Computer-Integrated Interventional Systems , 2010 .

[27]  Andrew D. Wiles,et al.  Accuracy assessment protocols for elektromagnetic tracking systems , 2003, CARS.

[28]  J. B. Stiehl,et al.  Validation and Metrology in CAOS , 2007 .

[29]  C. Mascott,et al.  Comparison of Magnetic Tracking and Optical Tracking by Simultaneous Use of Two Independent Frameless Stereotactic Systems , 2005, Neurosurgery.

[30]  K. Ungersböck,et al.  Computer-aided navigation in neurosurgery , 2003, Neurosurgical Review.