Pharmacokinetic Individualization of High-Dose Methotrexate Chemotherapy for the Treatment of localized Osteosarcoma

Abstract Individualization of high-dose methotrexate (MTX) dosing is important to achieve therapeutic levels (700-1,000 μm) for osteosarcoma. therefore we developed a pharmacokinetically (PK) individualized dosage regimen to maintain MTX concentrations of 700 μm (1 h bolus followed by 5 h maintenance infusion) and evaluated its safety and efficacy. Loading and maintenance doses were calculated by the PK parameters based on 2-compartment model analysis. Thirty-two courses of chemotherapy were performed in 9 patients with osteosarcoma. The maximum concentrations during maintenance infusion in 31 courses (97%) were above 700 μm. Only 1 patient developed severe hepatotoxicity as adverse effect. Total body clearance of MTX decreased in 4 patients when weekly MTX chemotherapy was performed for 3 consecutive weeks. Although the clearance was changed, the average MTX concentrations were maintained at about 700 μm by the PK individualization. The 5-year survival rate was 77.8% (7 of 9 patients), and all of them have survived for more than 9 years. This PK individualization is safe and useful for tailoring high-dose MTX therapy to achieve therapeutic levels.

[1]  Y. Lau,et al.  Multidisciplinary management of osteosarcoma: experience in Hong Kong. , 1998, Pediatric hematology and oncology.

[2]  F. Sim,et al.  Follow-up study of long-term survivors of osteosarcoma in the prechemotherapy era. , 2006, Human pathology.

[3]  P. Arnaud,et al.  Dose escalation with pharmacokinetics monitoring in methotrexate chemotherapy of osteosarcoma. , 1995, Anticancer research.

[4]  S. Ferrari,et al.  Methotrexate serum concentration and histological response to multiagent primary chemotherapy for osteosarcoma of the limbs. , 1996, Journal of chemotherapy.

[5]  G. Rosen,et al.  Influence of methotrexate dose intensity on outcome of patients with high grade osteogenic osteosarcoma: Analysis of the literature , 1996, Cancer.

[6]  W. Shi,et al.  Methotrexate levels and outcome in osteosarcoma , 2005, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[7]  M. Tan,et al.  High‐dose methotrexate pharmacokinetics and outcome of children and young adults with osteosarcoma , 2004, Cancer.

[8]  G. Bacci,et al.  Primary bone osteosarcoma in the pediatric age: state of the art. , 2006, Cancer treatment reviews.

[9]  K. Takagishi,et al.  Pirarubicin-Based versus Doxorubicin-Based Osteosarcoma Chemotherapy , 2002, The Annals of pharmacotherapy.

[10]  S. Ferrari,et al.  Predictive factors of histologic response to primary chemotherapy in osteosarcoma of the extremity: study of 272 patients preoperatively treated with high-dose methotrexate, doxorubicin, and cisplatin. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  S. Ferrari,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of osteosarcoma of the extremities: excellent response of the primary tumor to preoperative treatment with methotrexate, cisplatin, adriamycin, and ifosfamide. Preliminary results. , 1995, La Chirurgia degli organi di movimento.

[12]  S. Ferrari,et al.  Serum methotrexate (MTX) concentrations and prognosis in patients with osteosarcoma of the extremities treated with a multidrug neoadjuvant regimen. , 1993, Journal of chemotherapy.

[13]  U. Bode,et al.  Methotrexate pharmacokinetics and prognosis in osteosarcoma. , 1994, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  S. Rosenberg,et al.  Use of plasma pharmacokinetics to predict and prevent methotrexate toxicity. , 1977, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  T Nakagawa,et al.  A pharmacokinetic analysis program (multi) for microcomputer. , 1981, Journal of pharmacobio-dynamics.

[16]  B. Chabner,et al.  Role of drug concentration, duration of exposure, and endogenous metabolites in determining methotrexate cytotoxicity. , 1977, Cancer treatment reports.