The effect of registry-based performance feedback via short text messages and traditional postal letters on prescribing parenteral steroids by general practitioners - A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND It is conjectured that providing feedback on physicians' prescribing behavior improves quality of drug prescriptions. However, the effectiveness of feedback provision and mode of feedback delivery is not well understood. The objective of this study was to assess and compare the effect of traditional paper letters (TPL) and short text message (STM) feedback on general practitioners' prescribing behavior of parenteral steroids (PSs). METHODS In a single-blind randomized controlled trial, 906 general practitioners (GPs) having at least 10 monthly prescriptions were randomly recruited into two interventions and one control study arms with 1:1 allocation, stratified by percentage of prescriptions. The intervention was the provision of 3 feedback messages containing prescribing indices in TPL and STM (in the first two arms) versus the control arm (CG) with an interval of 3 months between these messages. We calculated the PS Defined Daily Dose (DDD) for every GP, every month, and compared between the 3 arms, before and after the interventions. The expected primary outcome was to reduce prescription of parenteral steroids by participants. The study was performed in the Kerman Social Security Organization in Iran. RESULTS A total of 906 GPs were selected for the trial, but only 721 of them (TPL=191, STM=228, CG=302) were recruited for the 1st feedback. The mean age of GPs was 44 and 59% of them were male. The prescribed parenteral steroid DDDs at baseline were similar (TPL=121.62, STM=127.49, CG=115.68, P>0.5). At the end of the study, DDDs in the TPL and STM arms were similar (TPL=104.38, STM=101.90, P>0.9) but DDDs in each intervention arm was statistically significantly lower than in CG (CG=156.17, P<0.0001). Being in TPL and STM arms resulted in 36.1 and 41.7 units of decrease in DDD respectively, compared to the control arm (P<0.02 and P<0.005) after the one-year duration of the study. CONCLUSION Feedback by TPLs and STMs on prescribing performance effectively reduced prescribing PSs by GPs. STM, being a cheap and fast tool, is potentially powerful and efficient for drug prescription rationalization.

[1]  James Hodson,et al.  Effects of a computerized feedback intervention on safety performance by junior doctors: results from a randomized mixed method study , 2013, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[2]  W. Nilsen,et al.  Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? , 2011, Translational behavioral medicine.

[3]  Arie Hasman,et al.  The efficacy of an automated feedback system for general practitioners. , 2003, Informatics in primary care.

[4]  K. Patrick,et al.  A Text Message–Based Intervention for Weight Loss: Randomized Controlled Trial , 2009, Journal of medical Internet research.

[5]  R Tomlins,et al.  Randomised controlled trial of effect of feedback on general practitioners' prescribing in Australia , 1999, BMJ.

[6]  Kamran Siddiqi,et al.  Getting evidence into practice: what works in developing countries? , 2005, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[7]  C. Abraham,et al.  Self-Directed Interventions to Promote Weight Loss: A Systematic Review of Reviews , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[8]  Mei-Jen Ho,et al.  Improving the Success of Mailed Letter Intervention Programs to Influence Prescribing Behaviors: A Review , 2012, Journal of managed care pharmacy : JMCP.

[9]  Gholamreza-Sepehri,et al.  The quality of prescribing in general practice in Kerman, Iran. , 2005, International journal of health care quality assurance incorporating Leadership in health services.

[10]  Jane M. Young,et al.  Does telling people what they have been doing change what they do? A systematic review of the effects of audit and feedback , 2006, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[11]  Hans Wedel,et al.  Effect of mailed feedback on drug prescribing profiles in general practice: a seven-year longitudinal study in Storstrøm County, Denmark , 2010, Upsala journal of medical sciences.

[12]  N. Joo,et al.  Mobile phone short message service messaging for behaviour modification in a community-based weight control programme in Korea , 2007, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[13]  Lucy Yardley,et al.  Developing a computer delivered, theory based intervention for guideline implementation in general practice , 2010, BMC family practice.

[14]  Paul A. de Clercq,et al.  The effect of computer reminders on GPs' prescribing behaviour: A cluster-randomised trial , 2007, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[15]  Rassoul Dinarvand,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of audit and feedback on physician’s prescribing indicators: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial with economic evaluation , 2012, Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences.

[16]  Behnam Sadeghirad,et al.  Rational Usage of Drug Indices in the Prescriptions of Kerman Medical Practitioners in 2008 , 2012 .

[17]  S Braybrook,et al.  Influencing prescribing in primary care: a comparison of two different prescribing feedback methods , 1996, Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics.

[18]  A. Moghadamnia,et al.  General practitioner prescribing patterns in Babol city, Islamic Republic of Iran. , 2002, Eastern Mediterranean health journal = La revue de sante de la Mediterranee orientale = al-Majallah al-sihhiyah li-sharq al-mutawassit.

[19]  B. Fjeldsoe,et al.  Behavior change interventions delivered by mobile telephone short-message service. , 2009, American journal of preventive medicine.

[20]  Nicolette de Keizer,et al.  Improving quality of care. A systematic review on how medical registries provide information feedback to health care providers , 2010, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[21]  D. Bates,et al.  Improving safety with information technology. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  Arie Hasman,et al.  Evaluation of an automated test ordering and feedback system for general practitioners in daily practice , 2004, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[23]  Rassoul Dinarvand,et al.  CHALLENGES AND ACHIEVEMENTS OF PROMOTING RATIONAL USE OF DRUGS IN IRAN , 2009 .

[24]  Jane M. Young,et al.  Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.