Neural correlates of the Dunning–Kruger effect

The Dunning–Kruger effect (DKE) is a metacognitive phenomenon of illusory superiority in which individuals who perform poorly on a task believe they performed better than others, yet individuals who performed very well believe they under‐performed compared to others. This phenomenon has yet to be directly explored in episodic memory, nor explored for physiological correlates or reaction times. We designed a novel method to elicit the DKE via a test of item recognition while electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded. Throughout the task, participants were asked to estimate the percentile in which they performed compared to others. Results revealed participants in the bottom 25th percentile over‐estimated their percentile, while participants in the top 75th percentile under‐estimated their percentile, exhibiting the classic DKE. Reaction time measures revealed a condition‐by‐group interaction whereby over‐estimators responded faster than under‐estimators when estimating being in the top percentile and responded slower when estimating being in the bottom percentile. Between‐group EEG differences were evident between over‐estimators and under‐estimators during Dunning–Kruger responses, which revealed FN400‐like effects of familiarity supporting differences for over‐estimators, whereas “old‐new” memory event‐related potential effects revealed a late parietal component associated with recollection‐based processing for under‐estimators that was not evident for over‐estimators. Findings suggest over‐ and under‐estimators use differing cognitive processes when assessing their performance, such that under‐estimators may rely on recollection during memory while over‐estimators may draw upon excess familiarity when over‐estimating their performance. Episodic memory thus appears to play a contributory role in metacognitive judgements of illusory superiority.

[1]  A. Mecklinger,et al.  From fluency to recognition decisions: A broader view of familiarity-based remembering , 2020, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  Gilles E. Gignac,et al.  The Dunning-Kruger effect is (mostly) a statistical artefact: Valid approaches to testing the hypothesis with individual differences data , 2020 .

[3]  Si Liu,et al.  Sensitivity of Reality Monitoring to Fluency: Evidence from Behavioral Performance and Event-Related Potential (ERP) Old/New Effects , 2019, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[4]  M. Alicke,et al.  The better-than-average effect in comparative self-evaluation: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. , 2019, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  Lori Dithurbide,et al.  An investigation into the Dunning–Kruger effect in sport coaching , 2019 .

[6]  Nick Yeung,et al.  Confidence Predictions Affect Performance Confidence and Neural Preparation in Perceptual Decision Making , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[7]  R. McIntosh,et al.  Wise up: Clarifying the role of metacognition in the Dunning-Kruger effect. , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  Richard J. Addante,et al.  Entrainment enhances theta oscillations and improves episodic memory , 2018, Cognitive neuroscience.

[9]  F. Craik,et al.  Effects of divided attention at encoding and retrieval: Further data , 2018, Memory & Cognition.

[10]  A. Niven,et al.  Why do they do (h)it? Using self-determination theory to understand why people start and continue to do high-intensity interval training group exercise classes , 2018 .

[11]  D. Donaldson,et al.  Investigating the Functional Utility of the Left Parietal ERP Old/New Effect: Brain Activity Predicts within But Not between Participant Variance in Episodic Recollection , 2017, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[12]  E. Loftus,et al.  The Effects of Exposure to Differing Amounts of Misinformation and Source Credibility Perception on Source Monitoring and Memory Accuracy , 2017 .

[13]  Joshua D Koen,et al.  The ROC Toolbox: A toolbox for analyzing receiver-operating characteristics derived from confidence ratings , 2016, Behavior Research Methods.

[14]  Jennifer C. Weeks,et al.  Divided attention reduces resistance to distraction at encoding but not retrieval , 2017, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  Regine Bader,et al.  Separating Event-related Potential Effects for Conceptual Fluency and Episodic Familiarity , 2017, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  A. Castel,et al.  Selectively Distracted: Divided Attention and Memory for Important Information , 2017, Psychological science.

[17]  Jonathan A. Fugelsang,et al.  Dunning–Kruger effects in reasoning: Theoretical implications of the failure to recognize incompetence , 2017, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  Khalid Mahmood,et al.  Do People Overestimate Their Information Literacy Skills? A Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence on the Dunning-Kruger Effect , 2016 .

[19]  Tamara van Gog,et al.  Reverse inference of memory retrieval processes underlying metacognitive monitoring of learning using multivariate pattern analysis , 2016, NeuroImage.

[20]  Richard J. Addante,et al.  Neurophysiological evidence that perceptions of fluency produce mere exposure effects , 2016, Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience.

[21]  D. Gallo,et al.  Two mechanisms of constructive recollection: Perceptual recombination and conceptual fluency. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  Christopher A Sanchez.  Differently confident: Susceptibility to bias in perceptual judgments of size interacts with working memory capacity , 2016, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[23]  E. Phelps,et al.  Flashbulb Memories , 2016, Current directions in psychological science.

[24]  Heather Bruett,et al.  Event-related potentials indicate that fluency can be interpreted as familiarity , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  D. Dunning,et al.  When Knowledge Knows No Bounds , 2015, Psychological science.

[26]  S. Kelly,et al.  The classic P300 encodes a build‐to‐threshold decision variable , 2015, The European journal of neuroscience.

[27]  C. Summerfield,et al.  The P300 as a build‐to‐threshold variable (Commentary on Twomey et al.) , 2015, The European journal of neuroscience.

[28]  Chuanji Gao,et al.  Processing fluency hinders subsequent recollection: an electrophysiological study , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[29]  Richard J. Addante.  A critical role of the human hippocampus in an electrophysiological measure of implicit memory , 2015, NeuroImage.

[30]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  A ten-year follow-up of a study of memory for the attack of September 11, 2001: Flashbulb memories and memories for flashbulb events. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[31]  Richard J. Addante,et al.  Pre-stimulus neural activity predicts successful encoding of inter-item associations , 2015, NeuroImage.

[32]  Steven J. Luck,et al.  ERPLAB: an open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[33]  Anne E. Urai,et al.  An Action-Independent Signature of Perceptual Choice in the Human Brain , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  Henry L Roediger,et al.  Positive and Negative Correlations Between Confidence and Accuracy for the Same Events in Recognition of Categorized Lists , 2014, Psychological science.

[35]  David Dunning,et al.  How unaware are the unskilled? Empirical tests of the “signal extraction” counterexplanation for the Dunning–Kruger effect in self-evaluation of performance , 2013 .

[36]  Giulia Galli,et al.  Available processing resources influence encoding-related brain activity before an event , 2013, Cortex.

[37]  D. Friedman.  The Cognitive Aging of Episodic Memory: A View Based on the Event-Related Brain Potential , 2013, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[38]  Sui Huang,et al.  When peers are not peers and don't know it: The Dunning‐Kruger effect and self‐fulfilling prophecy in peer‐review , 2013, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[39]  D. Schacter,et al.  Memory and law: what can cognitive neuroscience contribute? , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  Kevin Zish,et al.  Event-related potential (ERP) evidence for fluency-based recognition memory , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  Emma K. Bridger,et al.  The FN400 is functionally distinct from the N400 , 2012, NeuroImage.

[42]  Andrew P. Yonelinas,et al.  Neurophysiological evidence for a recollection impairment in amnesia patients that leaves familiarity intact , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  D. Schacter.  Adaptive constructive processes and the future of memory. , 2012, The American psychologist.

[44]  S. Kelly,et al.  A supramodal accumulation-to-bound signal that determines perceptual decisions in humans , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  Andreas Ortmann,et al.  Are the unskilled doomed to remain unaware , 2012 .

[46]  Michael F. Robertson,et al.  The Dunning-Kruger Effect and SIUC University's Aviation Students , 2012 .

[47]  D. Saucier,et al.  Enriched childhood experiences moderate age-related motor and cognitive decline , 2012, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[48]  Andrew P. Yonelinas,et al.  Examining ERP correlates of recognition memory: Evidence of accurate source recognition without recollection , 2012, NeuroImage.

[49]  L. Nadel,et al.  Memory and law , 2012 .

[50]  Joel L. Voss,et al.  Assuming too much from ‘familiar’ brain potentials , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[51]  A. Mecklinger,et al.  Response to Paller et al.: the role of familiarity in making inferences about unknown quantities , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[52]  Joel L. Voss,et al.  The impact of fluency on explicit memory tasks in amnesia , 2012, Cognitive neuroscience.

[53]  Deborah E. Hannula,et al.  Distinguishing highly confident accurate and inaccurate memory: Insights about relevant and irrelevant influences on memory confidence , 2012, Memory.

[54]  R. Poldrack.  Inferring Mental States from Neuroimaging Data: From Reverse Inference to Large-Scale Decoding , 2011, Neuron.

[55]  A. Mecklinger,et al.  Strategic retrieval in a reality monitoring task , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[56]  Arne D. Ekstrom,et al.  Prestimulus theta activity predicts correct source memory retrieval , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  Yuiko Sakuta,et al.  Effects of aging and divided attention on memory for items and their contexts. , 2010, Psychology and aging.

[58]  C. Ranganath.  A unified framework for the functional organization of the medial temporal lobes and the phenomenology of episodic memory , 2010, Hippocampus.

[59]  Ken A. Paller,et al.  Conceptual Priming and Familiarity: Different Expressions of Memory during Recognition Testing with Distinct Neurophysiological Correlates , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[60]  A. Yonelinas,et al.  Recollection and familiarity: Examining controversial assumptions and new directions , 2010, Hippocampus.

[61]  J. Wixted,et al.  A continuous dual-process model of remember/know judgments. , 2010, Psychological review.

[62]  Lael J. Schooler,et al.  It just felt right: The neural correlates of the fluency heuristic , 2010, Consciousness and Cognition.

[63]  Ken A Paller,et al.  What makes recognition without awareness appear to be elusive? Strategic factors that influence the accuracy of guesses. , 2010, Learning & memory.

[64]  Matthias J. Gruber,et al.  Voluntary Control over Prestimulus Activity Related to Encoding , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[65]  Joel L. Voss,et al.  Real-Time Neural Signals of Perceptual Priming with Unfamiliar Geometric Shapes , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[66]  Jonathon D. Brown.  Across the (Not So) Great Divide: Cultural Similarities in Self‐Evaluative Processes , 2010 .

[67]  Clayton R. Critcher,et al.  How chronic self-views influence (and mislead) self-assessments of task performance: self-views shape bottom-up experiences with the task. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[68]  Antonino Vallesi,et al.  Cognitive association formation in episodic memory: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[69]  L. Kvavilashvili,et al.  Consistency of flashbulb memories of September 11 over long delays: Implications for consolidation and wrong time slice hypotheses , 2009 .

[70]  A. Thapar,et al.  Aging and fluency-based illusions in recognition memory. , 2009, Psychology and aging.

[71]  D. Geldmacher.  The Neurobiology of Learning and Memory , 2009 .

[72]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation , 2009, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[73]  Colleen M. Parks,et al.  Evidence for a memory threshold in second-choice recognition memory responses , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[74]  D. Westerman.  Relative fluency and illusions of recognition memory , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[75]  Rachel A Diana,et al.  The effects of unitization on familiarity-based source memory: testing a behavioral prediction derived from neuroimaging data. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[76]  D. Moore,et al.  The trouble with overconfidence. , 2008, Psychological review.

[77]  R. Clark,et al.  Recognition memory and the medial temporal lobe: a new perspective , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[78]  J. Pruessner,et al.  Impaired familiarity with preserved recollection after anterior temporal-lobe resection that spares the hippocampus , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[79]  Colleen M. Parks,et al.  Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: a review. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[80]  Colleen M. Parks,et al.  The Role of Noncriterial Recollection in Estimating Recollection and Familiarity. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.

[81]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[82]  M. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and recognition memory , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[83]  Ken A Paller,et al.  Neural correlates of conceptual implicit memory and their contamination of putative neural correlates of explicit memory. , 2007, Learning & memory.

[84]  Andreas Ortmann,et al.  Are the Unskilled Really that Unaware? An Alternative Explanation , 2007 .

[85]  A. Castel,et al.  Illusions of competence and overestimation of associative memory for identical items: Evidence from judgments of learning , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[86]  Hiroki R. Hayama,et al.  Electrophysiological dissociation of the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity , 2006, Brain Research.

[87]  Myra A. Fernandes,et al.  Brain regions associated with successful and unsuccessful retrieval of verbal episodic memory as revealed by divided attention , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[88]  Michael J. Serra,et al.  Does retrieval fluency contribute to the underconfidence-with-practice effect? , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[89]  S. Luck.  An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique , 2005 .

[90]  Richard J. Addante,et al.  Event-related potential evidence for multiple causes of the revelation effect , 2005, Consciousness and Cognition.

[91]  Asher Koriat,et al.  The effects of encoding fluency and retrieval fluency on judgments of learning , 2005 .

[92]  T. Curran.  Effects of attention and confidence on the hypothesized ERP correlates of recollection and familiarity , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[93]  John R. Chambers,et al.  Biases in social comparative judgments: the role of nonmotivated factors in above-average and comparative-optimism effects. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.

[94]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[95]  E. Donchin,et al.  Localization of the event-related potential novelty response as defined by principal components analysis. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[96]  B. W. Whittlesea,et al.  Two fluency heuristics (and how to tell them apart) , 2003 .

[97]  Glenn Geher,et al.  We think you agree: The detrimental impact of the false consensus effect on behavior , 2002 .

[98]  Gary L. Wells,et al.  The Confidence of Eyewitnesses in Their Identifications From Lineups , 2002 .

[99]  B. W. Whittlesea,et al.  Two routes to remembering (and another to remembering not). , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[100]  A. Yonelinas.  The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research , 2002 .

[101]  Joachim Krueger,et al.  Unskilled, unaware, or both? The better-than-average heuristic and statistical regression predict errors in estimates of own performance. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[102]  R. Simons,et al.  On the relationship of P3a and the Novelty-P3 , 2001, Biological Psychology.

[103]  M Naveh-Benjamin,et al.  Divided attention during encoding and retrieval: differential control effects? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[104]  T. Curran.  Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[105]  E. Donchin,et al.  Relationship between P300 amplitude and subsequent recall for distinctive events: dependence on type of distinctiveness attribute. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[106]  L D Williams,et al.  The source of feelings of familiarity: the discrepancy-attribution hypothesis. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[107]  B. W. Whittlesea,et al.  The heuristic basis of remembering and classification: fluency, generation, and resemblance. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[108]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory , 1998, Nature.

[109]  R. Knight.  Contribution of human hippocampal region to novelty detection , 1996, Nature.

[110]  Andrew P. Yonelinas,et al.  Noncriterial Recollection: Familiarity as Automatic, Irrelevant Recollection , 1996, Consciousness and Cognition.

[111]  Fiona Badey.  A night to remember. , 1995, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[112]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  An Information-Maximization Approach to Blind Separation and Blind Deconvolution , 1995, Neural Computation.

[113]  B. W. Whittlesea.  Illusions of familiarity. , 1993 .

[114]  Mieke Verfaellie,et al.  Fluency versus conscious recollection in the word completion performance of amnesic patients , 1992, Brain and Cognition.

[115]  Ulric Neisser,et al.  Phantom flashbulbs: False recollections of hearing the news about Challenger. , 1992 .

[116]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  Illusions of immediate memory: evidence of an attributional basis for feelings of familiarity and perceptual quality , 1990 .

[117]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Effects of aging on source monitoring: differences in susceptibility to false fame. , 1990, Psychology and aging.

[118]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Becoming famous without being recognized: Unconscious influences of memory produced by dividing attention , 1989 .

[119]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Becoming Famous Overnight: Limits on the Ability to Avoid Unconscious Influences of the Past , 1989 .

[120]  Norman Miller,et al.  Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: an empirical and theoretical review , 1987 .

[121]  Jonathon D. Brown,et al.  Evaluations of Self and Others: Self-Enhancement Biases in Social Judgments , 1986 .

[122]  W. Shakespeare,et al.  As you like It , 1983, Gastroenterology.

[123]  O. Svenson.  ARE WE ALL LESS RISKY AND MORE SKILLFUL THAN OUR FELLOW DRIVERS , 1981 .

[124]  James V. Bradley,et al.  Overconfidence in ignorant experts , 1981 .

[125]  J. Sieber.  Confidence Estimates on the Correctness of Constructed and Multiple-Choice Responses. , 1979 .

[126]  L. Ross,et al.  The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes , 1977 .

[127]  K. Cross.  Not can, but will college teaching be improved? , 1977 .

[128]  Elizabeth F Loftus,et al.  Leading questions and the eyewitness report , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[129]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of processing: A framework for memory research , 1972 .

[130]  S. Oskamp.  OVERCONFIDENCE IN CASE-STUDY JUDGMENTS. , 1965, Journal of consulting psychology.

[131]  P. A. Adams,et al.  Confidence in the recognition and reproduction of words difficult to spell. , 1960, The American journal of psychology.

[132]  P. Smith,et al.  The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex , 1871, Nature.

[133]  Olesya Govorun,et al.  Better-than-Average Effect , 2020, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[134]  Alana Muller.  Neurological Correlates of the Dunning-Kruger Effect , 2019 .

[135]  David Dunning,et al.  Overconfidence Among Beginners: Is a Little Learning a Dangerous Thing? , 2018, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[136]  Joel L. Voss,et al.  Neural Substrates of Remembering: Event-Related Potential Studies , 2017 .

[137]  Marie Weisz,et al.  The Analects Of Confucius , 2016 .

[138]  Marina Schmid,et al.  An Introduction To The Event Related Potential Technique , 2016 .

[139]  Huajian Cai,et al.  On the panculturality of self-enhancement and self-protection motivation: the case for the universality of self-esteem , 2015 .

[140]  Marissa K. Hartwig,et al.  The contribution of judgment scale to the unskilled-and-unaware phenomenon: How evaluating others can exaggerate over- (and under-) confidence , 2014, Memory & cognition.

[141]  D. Dunning.  The Dunning–Kruger Effect , 2011 .

[142]  Brian P. Kurilla,et al.  Processing fluency affects subjective claims of recollection , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[143]  J. Wixted.  Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[144]  A. Heaton-Armstrong.  Witness testimony : psychological, investigative and evidential perspectives , 2006 .

[145]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Reconceptualizing individual differences in self-enhancement bias: an interpersonal approach. , 2004, Psychological review.

[146]  M. Kishiyama,et al.  The von Restorff Effect in Amnesia: The Contribution of the Hippocampal System to Novelty-Related Memory Enhancements , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[147]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Encoding fluency is a cue used for judgments about learning. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[148]  David Dunning,et al.  How chronic self-views influence (and potentially mislead) estimates of performance. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[149]  Andrew P. Yonelinas,et al.  Recognition memory ROCs and the dual-process signal-detection model: Comment on Glanzer, Kim, Hilford, and Adams (1999). , 1999 .

[150]  R T Knight,et al.  Anatomic bases of event-related potentials and their relationship to novelty detection in humans. , 1998, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[151]  T. O. Nelson.  Metamemory: A Theoretical Framework and New Findings , 1990 .

[152]  Takaichiro Suzuki,et al.  :A Ten-year Follow-up Study , 1981 .

[153]  E. Loftus,et al.  Eyewitness testimony: The influence of the wording of a question , 1975 .

[154]  P. S..  The Descent of Man, and Selection in relation to Sex , 1875, Nature.