Revealing kinetics and state-dependent binding properties of IKur-targeting drugs that maximize atrial fibrillation selectivity.

The KV1.5 potassium channel, which underlies the ultra-rapid delayed-rectifier current (IKur) and is predominantly expressed in atria vs. ventricles, has emerged as a promising target to treat atrial fibrillation (AF). However, while numerous KV1.5-selective compounds have been screened, characterized, and tested in various animal models of AF, evidence of antiarrhythmic efficacy in humans is still lacking. Moreover, current guidelines for pre-clinical assessment of candidate drugs heavily rely on steady-state concentration-response curves or IC50 values, which can overlook adverse cardiotoxic effects. We sought to investigate the effects of kinetics and state-dependent binding of IKur-targeting drugs on atrial electrophysiology in silico and reveal the ideal properties of IKur blockers that maximize anti-AF efficacy and minimize pro-arrhythmic risk. To this aim, we developed a new Markov model of IKur that describes KV1.5 gating based on experimental voltage-clamp data in atrial myocytes from patient right-atrial samples in normal sinus rhythm. We extended the IKur formulation to account for state-specificity and kinetics of KV1.5-drug interactions and incorporated it into our human atrial cell model. We simulated 1- and 3-Hz pacing protocols in drug-free conditions and with a [drug] equal to the IC50 value. The effects of binding and unbinding kinetics were determined by examining permutations of the forward (kon) and reverse (koff) binding rates to the closed, open, and inactivated states of the KV1.5 channel. We identified a subset of ideal drugs exhibiting anti-AF electrophysiological parameter changes at fast pacing rates (effective refractory period prolongation), while having little effect on normal sinus rhythm (limited action potential prolongation). Our results highlight that accurately accounting for channel interactions with drugs, including kinetics and state-dependent binding, is critical for developing safer and more effective pharmacological anti-AF options.

[1]  Yoshihisa Kurachi,et al.  In silico study on the effects of IKur block kinetics on prolongation of human action potential after atrial fibrillation-induced electrical remodeling. , 2008, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[2]  Stefan A. Mann,et al.  In silico assessment of kinetics and state dependent binding properties of drugs causing acquired LQTS. , 2016, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[3]  U. Ravens,et al.  Ultra-rapid delayed rectifier channels: molecular basis and therapeutic implications. , 2011, Cardiovascular research.

[4]  N. P. Borgstrom,et al.  Targeting the late component of the cardiac L-type Ca2+ current to suppress early afterdepolarizations , 2015, The Journal of general physiology.

[5]  Kelly C. Chang,et al.  Improving the In Silico Assessment of Proarrhythmia Risk by Combining hERG (Human Ether-à-go-go-Related Gene) Channel–Drug Binding Kinetics and Multichannel Pharmacology , 2017, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[6]  N. Trayanova,et al.  A Computational Model to Predict the Effects of Class I Anti-Arrhythmic Drugs on Ventricular Rhythms , 2011, Science Translational Medicine.

[7]  M. Bleich,et al.  Effects of the atrial antiarrhythmic drug AVE0118 on cardiac ion channels , 2004, Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology.

[8]  Pablo Laguna,et al.  The Na+/K+ pump is an important modulator of refractoriness and rotor dynamics in human atrial tissue. , 2012, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[9]  P. Karczewski,et al.  Regulation of the transient outward K(+) current by Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinases II in human atrial myocytes. , 1999, Circulation research.

[10]  Ursula Ravens,et al.  Effects of IKur blocker MK-0448 on human right atrial action potentials from patients in sinus rhythm and in permanent atrial fibrillation , 2014, Front. Pharmacol..

[11]  H. Matsubara,et al.  Pretranslational mechanisms determine the type of potassium channels expressed in the rat skeletal and cardiac muscles. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[12]  M. Juhaszova,et al.  Hypoxia inhibits gene expression of voltage-gated K+ channel alpha subunits in pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells. , 1997, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[13]  S. Nattel,et al.  In silico optimization of atrial fibrillation-selective sodium channel blocker pharmacodynamics. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[14]  Andrew D McCulloch,et al.  Atrial-selective targeting of arrhythmogenic phase-3 early afterdepolarizations in human myocytes. , 2016, Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology.

[15]  S. Ogawa,et al.  Determination of refractory periods and conduction velocity during atrial fibrillation using atrial capture in dogs: direct assessment of the wavelength and its modulation by a sodium channel blocker, pilsicainide. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  S. Nattel,et al.  Rate-Dependent Role of IKur in Human Atrial Repolarization and Atrial Fibrillation Maintenance. , 2017, Biophysical journal.

[17]  H. Crijns,et al.  Ion Channel Remodeling Is Related to Intraoperative Atrial Effective Refractory Periods in Patients With Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation , 2001, Circulation.

[18]  Mary M Maleckar,et al.  Anti-arrhythmic strategies for atrial fibrillation: The role of computational modeling in discovery, development, and optimization. , 2016, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[19]  B. Fermini,et al.  Novel, Potent Inhibitors of Human Kv1.5 K+ Channels and Ultrarapidly Activating Delayed Rectifier Potassium Current , 2006, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[20]  Eric A. Sobie,et al.  Parameter sensitivity analysis of stochastic models provides insights into cardiac calcium sparks. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[21]  Ursula Ravens,et al.  The positive frequency-dependent electrophysiological effects of the IKur inhibitor XEN-D0103 are desirable for the treatment of atrial fibrillation , 2016, Heart rhythm.

[22]  F. Fernández‐Avilés,et al.  In humans, chronic atrial fibrillation decreases the transient outward current and ultrarapid component of the delayed rectifier current differentially on each atria and increases the slow component of the delayed rectifier current in both. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  D. Grandmougin,et al.  Risperidone reduces K+ currents in human atrial myocytes and prolongs repolarization in human myocardium. , 2004, European journal of pharmacology.

[24]  H. Crijns,et al.  Alterations in potassium channel gene expression in atria of patients with persistent and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: differential regulation of protein and mRNA levels for K+ channels. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  Alan Garfinkel,et al.  Modifying L-type calcium current kinetics: consequences for cardiac excitation and arrhythmia dynamics. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[26]  E. Sobie Parameter sensitivity analysis in electrophysiological models using multivariable regression. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[27]  Icilio Cavero,et al.  Comprehensive in vitro Proarrhythmia Assay, a novel in vitro/in silico paradigm to detect ventricular proarrhythmic liability: a visionary 21st century initiative , 2014, Expert opinion on drug safety.

[28]  M. Sanguinetti,et al.  Binding Site of a Novel Kv1.5 Blocker: A “Foot in the Door” against Atrial Fibrillation , 2006, Molecular Pharmacology.

[29]  Qinlian Zhou,et al.  Markov Models of Use-Dependence and Reverse Use-Dependence during the Mouse Cardiac Action Potential , 2012, PloS one.

[30]  D. Fedida,et al.  Closed- and open-state binding of 4-aminopyridine to the cloned human potassium channel Kv1.5. , 1995, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[31]  B. Fermini,et al.  Identity of a novel delayed rectifier current from human heart with a cloned K+ channel current. , 1993, Circulation research.

[32]  U Ravens,et al.  Differences between outward currents of human atrial and subepicardial ventricular myocytes. , 1996, The Journal of physiology.

[33]  Ursula Ravens,et al.  Remodeling of cardiomyocyte ion channels in human atrial fibrillation , 2003, Basic Research in Cardiology.

[34]  L. Kaczmarek,et al.  Cloning and expression of cDNA and genomic clones encoding three delayed rectifier potassium channels in rat brain , 1990, Neuron.

[35]  Eleonora Grandi,et al.  Logistic regression analysis of populations of electrophysiological models to assess proarrythmic risk , 2016, MethodsX.

[36]  Stefano Severi,et al.  Comprehensive Analyses of Ventricular Myocyte Models Identify Targets Exhibiting Favorable Rate Dependence , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[37]  D. Dobrev,et al.  Role of IKur in Controlling Action Potential Shape and Contractility in the Human Atrium: Influence of Chronic Atrial Fibrillation , 2004, Circulation.

[38]  S Nattel,et al.  Sustained depolarization-induced outward current in human atrial myocytes. Evidence for a novel delayed rectifier K+ current similar to Kv1.5 cloned channel currents. , 1993, Circulation research.

[39]  D. Snyders,et al.  Mutations throughout the S6 region of the hKv1.5 channel alter the stability of the activation gate. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[40]  D. Beuckelmann,et al.  The ultrarapid and the transient outward K(+) current in human atrial fibrillation. Their possible role in postoperative atrial fibrillation. , 2000, Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology.

[41]  Q. Zhao,et al.  Cambios del periodo refractario efectivo auricular y de la IKACh tras estimulación vagal más estimulación eléctrica rápida en venas pulmonares , 2009 .

[42]  J. Nerbonne,et al.  Molecular basis of electrical remodeling in atrial fibrillation. , 2000, Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology.

[43]  U. Ravens,et al.  Atrial selectivity of antiarrhythmic drugs , 2013, The Journal of physiology.

[44]  Stanley Nattel,et al.  Potassium Channel Blockade Enhances Atrial Fibrillation–Selective Antiarrhythmic Effects of Optimized State-Dependent Sodium Channel Blockade , 2015, Circulation.

[45]  Eric A Sobie,et al.  There and back again: Iterating between population-based modeling and experiments reveals surprising regulation of calcium transients in rat cardiac myocytes. , 2016, Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology.

[46]  Malte Kelm,et al.  Blockade of atrial-specific K+-currents increases atrial but not ventricular contractility by enhancing reverse mode Na+/Ca2+-exchange. , 2007, Cardiovascular research.

[47]  E. Sobie,et al.  Improved Prediction of Drug‐Induced Torsades de Pointes Through Simulations of Dynamics and Machine Learning Algorithms , 2016, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[48]  J. Shryock,et al.  Cellular basis for the negative dromotropic effect of adenosine on rabbit single atrioventricular nodal cells. , 1996, Circulation research.

[49]  Donald M Bers,et al.  Human atrial fibrillation: insights from computational electrophysiological models. , 2011, Trends in cardiovascular medicine.

[50]  K. Matschke,et al.  Pathology‐specific effects of the IKur/Ito/IK,ACh blocker AVE0118 on ion channels in human chronic atrial fibrillation , 2008, British journal of pharmacology.