Stimulus synthesis for efficient evaluation and refinement of perceptual image quality metrics

We propose a methodology for comparing and refining perceptual image quality metrics based on synthetic images that are optimized to best differentiate two candidate quality metrics. We start from an initial distorted image and iteratively search for the best/worst images in terms of one metric while constraining the value of the other to remain fixed. We then repeat this, reversing the roles of the two metrics. Subjective test on the quality of pairs of these images generated at different initial distortion levels provides a strong indication of the relative strength and weaknesses of the metrics being compared. This methodology also provides an efficient way to further refine the definition of an image quality metric.

[1]  J. Robson,et al.  Grating summation in fovea and periphery , 1978, Vision Research.

[2]  Olivier D. Faugeras,et al.  Decorrelation Methods of Texture Feature Extraction , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[3]  A. Bovik,et al.  A universal image quality index , 2002, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[4]  Song-Chun Zhu,et al.  Prior Learning and Gibbs Reaction-Diffusion , 1997, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  Thrasyvoulos N. Pappas,et al.  Perceptual criteria for image quality evaluation , 2005 .

[6]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Multi-scale structural similarity for image quality assessment , 2003 .

[7]  André Gagalowicz,et al.  A New Method for Texture Fields Synthesis: Some Applications to the Study of Human Vision , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[8]  James R. Bergen,et al.  Pyramid-based texture analysis/synthesis , 1995, Proceedings., International Conference on Image Processing.

[9]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  A Parametric Texture Model Based on Joint Statistics of Complex Wavelet Coefficients , 2000, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[10]  Patrick C. Teo,et al.  Perceptual image distortion , 1994, Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Image Processing.

[11]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Image Quality Assessment: From Error Measurement to Structural Similarity , 2004 .

[12]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  41 OBJECTIVE VIDEO QUALITY ASSESSMENT , 2003 .

[13]  A. Bovik,et al.  OBJECTIVE VIDEO QUALITY ASSESSMENT , 2003 .