A scale‐space curvature matching algorithm for the reconstruction of complex proximal humeral fractures

HighlightsNovel scale‐space representation of the curvature of the fracture lines.Accurate fracture reconstruction without relying on a reconstruction template.Fracture reconstruction solely based on the information of the fracture lines.Pose‐invariant reconstruction algorithm for complex proximal humeral fractures. Abstract The optimal surgical treatment of complex fractures of the proximal humerus is controversial. It is proven that best results are obtained if an anatomical reduction of the fragments is achieved and, therefore, computer‐assisted methods have been proposed for the reconstruction of the fractures. However, complex fractures of the proximal humerus are commonly accompanied with a relevant displacement of the fragments and, therefore, algorithms relying on the initial position of the fragments might fail. The state‐of‐the‐art algorithm for complex fractures of the proximal humerus requires the acquisition of a CT scan of the (healthy) contralateral anatomy as a reconstruction template to address the displacement of the fragments. Pose‐invariant fracture line based reconstruction algorithms have been applied successful for reassembling broken vessels in archaeology. Nevertheless, the extraction of the fracture lines and the necessary computation of their curvature are susceptible to noise and make the application of previous approaches difficult or even impossible for bone fractures close to the joints, where the cortical layer is thin. We present a novel scale‐space representation of the curvature, permitting to calculate the correct alignment between bone fragments solely based on corresponding regions of the fracture lines. The fractures of the proximal humerus are automatically reconstructed based on iterative pairwise reduction of the fragments. The validation of the presented method was performed on twelve clinical cases, surgically treated after complex proximal humeral fracture, and by cadaver experiments. The accuracy of our approach was compared to the state‐of‐the‐art algorithm for complex fractures of the proximal humerus. All reconstructions of the clinical cases resulted in an accurate approximation of the pre‐traumatic anatomy. The accuracy of the reconstructed cadaver cases outperformed the current state‐of‐the‐art algorithm. Graphical abstract Figure. No Caption available.

[1]  Gábor Székely,et al.  Computer assisted reconstruction of complex proximal humerus fractures for preoperative planning , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[2]  A. J. Wijgman,et al.  Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Three and Four-Part Fractures of the Proximal Part of the Humerus , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  C. Gerber,et al.  Large metaphyseal volume hemiprostheses for complex fractures of the proximal humerus. , 2014, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[4]  G. Székely,et al.  An interactive surgical planning tool for acetabular fractures: initial results , 2010, Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research.

[5]  William E. Lorensen,et al.  Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[6]  Philipp Fürnstahl,et al.  Three-dimensional corrective osteotomies of complex malunited humeral fractures using patient-specific guides. , 2016, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[7]  Leo Joskowicz,et al.  Haptic computer-assisted patient-specific preoperative planning for orthopedic fractures surgery , 2015, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[8]  Eric Ricchetti,et al.  Three-dimensional preoperative planning software and a novel information transfer technology improve glenoid component positioning. , 2014, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  Thomas Gerig,et al.  Gaussian Process Morphable Models , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[10]  Jun S. Kim,et al.  Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures: a meta-analysis. , 2016, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[11]  Jonathan C. Levy,et al.  Accuracy of patient-specific guided glenoid baseplate positioning for reverse shoulder arthroplasty. , 2014, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[12]  S. Umeyama,et al.  Least-Squares Estimation of Transformation Parameters Between Two Point Patterns , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[13]  Philipp Fürnstahl Computer-assisted planning for orthopedic surgery , 2010 .

[14]  Ismail Hakki Toroslu,et al.  Automatic reconstruction of broken 3-D surface objects , 1999, Comput. Graph..

[15]  J. Skedros,et al.  Radiographic morphometry and densitometry predict strength of cadaveric proximal humeri more reliably than age and DXA scan density , 2016, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[16]  P Boileau,et al.  Tuberosity malposition and migration: reasons for poor outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. , 2002, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[17]  Pengcheng Liu,et al.  A computational/experimental platform for investigating three-dimensional puzzle solving of comminuted articular fractures , 2011, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[18]  C Gerber,et al.  Internal fixation of complex fractures of the proximal humerus. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[19]  Thomas Vetter,et al.  Automatic Fracture Reduction , 2012, MeshMed.

[20]  Juan José Jiménez-Delgado,et al.  Computer assisted preoperative planning of bone fracture reduction: Simulation techniques and new trends , 2016, Medical Image Anal..

[21]  James A. Johnson,et al.  Improved accuracy of computer assisted glenoid implantation in total shoulder arthroplasty: an in-vitro randomized controlled trial. , 2009, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[22]  N. Verma,et al.  Open reduction internal fixation has fewer short-term complications than shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures. , 2016, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[23]  C. Gerber,et al.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for acute head-splitting, 3- and 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly. , 2016, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[24]  Simon Winkelbach,et al.  Pairwise Matching of 3D Fragments Using Cluster Trees , 2008, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[25]  Y. Tropet,et al.  Three or four parts complex proximal humerus fractures: hemiarthroplasty versus reverse prosthesis: a comparative study of 40 cases. , 2009, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[26]  Tobias Gass,et al.  Simultaneous Segmentation and Multiresolution Nonrigid Atlas Registration , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[27]  Thomas Vetter,et al.  Posterior shape models , 2013, Medical Image Anal..

[28]  G Russell Huffman,et al.  Neer Award 2006: Biomechanical assessment of inferior tuberosity placement during hemiarthroplasty for four-part proximal humeral fractures. , 2008, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[29]  Carl de Boor,et al.  A Practical Guide to Splines , 1978, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[30]  Andrew R. Willis,et al.  Virtual 3D bone fracture reconstruction via inter-fragmentary surface alignment , 2009, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, ICCV Workshops.

[31]  Maxime Descoteaux,et al.  Bone enhancement filtering: Application to sinus bone segmentation and simulation of pituitary surgery , 2006, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[32]  Ingrid Carlbom,et al.  A haptics-assisted cranio-maxillofacial surgery planning system for restoring skeletal anatomy in complex trauma cases , 2013, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[33]  Haim J. Wolfson,et al.  3-D Curve Matching , 2011 .

[34]  Tobias Gass,et al.  Computer algorithms for three-dimensional measurement of humeral anatomy: analysis of 140 paired humeri. , 2016, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[35]  Edsger W. Dijkstra,et al.  A note on two problems in connexion with graphs , 1959, Numerische Mathematik.

[36]  Purang Abolmaesumi,et al.  Global registration of multiple bone fragments using statistical atlas models: Feasibility experiments , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[37]  Andrew R. Willis,et al.  3D reconstruction of highly fragmented bone fractures , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[38]  James A. Johnson,et al.  Early experience with computer-assisted shoulder hemiarthroplasty for fractures of the proximal humerus: development of a novel technique and an in vitro comparison with traditional methods. , 2007, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[39]  I. Jolliffe Principal Component Analysis , 2002 .

[40]  Suchendra M. Bhandarkar,et al.  Virtual multi-fracture craniofacial reconstruction using computer vision and graph matching , 2009, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[41]  Peter Wonka,et al.  A new image registration scheme based on curvature scale space curve matching , 2007, The Visual Computer.

[42]  Simon Winkelbach,et al.  Fast Random Sample Matching of 3d Fragments , 2004, DAGM-Symposium.

[43]  C. Gerber,et al.  The clinical relevance of posttraumatic avascular necrosis of the humeral head. , 1998, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[44]  Georgios Papaioannou,et al.  Fast Fragment Assemblage Using Boundary Line and Surface Matching , 2003, 2003 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop.

[45]  H. Yoshikawa,et al.  Three-dimensional corrective osteotomy of malunited fractures of the upper extremity with use of a computer simulation system. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[46]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions , 1987 .

[47]  D. Pupello,et al.  Comparison of hemiarthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. , 2013, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[48]  Yen-Wei Chen,et al.  Computer-Assisted Preoperative Planning for Reduction of Proximal Femoral Fracture Using 3-D-CT Data , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[49]  C. Neer Displaced Proximal Humeral Fractures , 1970 .

[50]  David Salomon,et al.  Curves and surfaces for computer graphics , 2005 .

[51]  F. Lecouvet,et al.  Multidetector spiral CT arthrography of the shoulder. Clinical applications and limits, with MR arthrography and arthroscopic correlations. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[52]  M. Harders,et al.  An Optimized Surgical Planning Environment for Complex Proximal Humerus Fractures , 2007 .

[53]  James A. Johnson,et al.  An anthropometric study of the bilateral anatomy of the humerus. , 2007, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[54]  C. Ahmad,et al.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review. , 2014, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[55]  Benjamin B. Kimia,et al.  Archaeological Fragment Reconstruction Using Curve-Matching , 2003, 2003 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop.