On the analysis of movement smoothness

Quantitative measures of smoothness play an important role in the assessment of sensorimotor impairment and motor learning. Traditionally, movement smoothness has been computed mainly for discrete movements, in particular arm, reaching and circle drawing, using kinematic data. There are currently very few studies investigating smoothness of rhythmic movements, and there is no systematic way of analysing the smoothness of such movements. There is also very little work on the smoothness of other movement related variables such as force, impedance etc. In this context, this paper presents the first step towards a unified framework for the analysis of smoothness of arbitrary movements and using various data. It starts with a systematic definition of movement smoothness and the different factors that influence smoothness, followed by a review of existing methods for quantifying the smoothness of discrete movements. A method is then introduced to analyse the smoothness of rhythmic movements by generalising the techniques developed for discrete movements. We finally propose recommendations for analysing smoothness of any general sensorimotor behaviour.

[1]  S. K. Wee,et al.  Effects of a robot-assisted training of grasp and pronation/supination in chronic stroke: a pilot study , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[2]  Corwin Boake,et al.  Normalized Movement Quality Measures for Therapeutic Robots Strongly Correlate With Clinical Motor Impairment Measures , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[3]  K. Takada,et al.  Smoothness of Human Jaw Movement during Chewing , 1999, Journal of dental research.

[4]  N. Hogan,et al.  Submovement changes characterize generalization of motor recovery after stroke , 2009, Cortex.

[5]  J. VanSwearingen,et al.  Harmonic ratios: a quantification of step to step symmetry. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  Alan Hreljac The relationship between smoothness and performance during the practice of a lower limb obstacle avoidance task , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[7]  Leslie G. Portney Dpt PhD Fapta,et al.  Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice , 2015 .

[8]  M. Akay,et al.  Quantitative Measures of Functional Upper Limb Movement in Persons after Stroke , 2005, Conference Proceedings. 2nd International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, 2005..

[9]  Etienne Burdet,et al.  A Robust and Sensitive Metric for Quantifying Movement Smoothness , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  B. Volpe,et al.  Kinematic Robot-Based Evaluation Scales and Clinical Counterparts to Measure Upper Limb Motor Performance in Patients With Chronic Stroke , 2010, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[11]  G E Stelmach,et al.  Stability of reach-to-grasp movement patterns in Parkinson's disease. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  Sensitivity of Smoothness Measures to Movement Duration, Amplitude, and Arrests , 2009, Journal of motor behavior.

[13]  Howard Rosenbaum,et al.  Effects of reading proficiency on embedded stem priming in primary school children , 2021 .

[14]  N. Hogan,et al.  On rhythmic and discrete movements: reflections, definitions and implications for motor control , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Movement accuracy constraints in Parkinson’s disease patients , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  N. Hogan,et al.  Response to upper-limb robotics and functional neuromuscular stimulation following stroke. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[17]  Terrence J. Sejnowski Neurobiology: Making smooth moves , 1998, Nature.

[18]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Avoiding spurious submovement decompositions: a globally optimal algorithm , 2003, Biological Cybernetics.

[19]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Acceleration patterns of the head and pelvis when walking are associated with risk of falling in community-dwelling older people. , 2003, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[20]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[21]  N. Hogan,et al.  Movement Smoothness Changes during Stroke Recovery , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  Etienne Burdet,et al.  Human Robotics: Neuromechanics and Motor Control , 2013 .

[23]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[24]  Ilaria Carpinella,et al.  Robot-based rehabilitation of the upper limbs in multiple sclerosis: feasibility and preliminary results. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[25]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Avoiding Spurious Submovement Decompositions II: A Scattershot Algorithm , 2006, Biological Cybernetics.

[26]  Subashan Perera,et al.  Walking smoothness is associated with self-reported function after accounting for gait speed. , 2013, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[27]  N. Vøllestad,et al.  The smoothness of unconstrained head movements is velocity-dependent. , 2013, Human movement science.

[28]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Arm function after stroke: Neurophysiological correlates and recovery mechanisms assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[29]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  Rhythmic Manipulation of Objects with Complex Dynamics: Predictability over Chaos , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[30]  V. Sanguineti,et al.  Robotic Assessment of Upper Limb Motor Function After Stroke , 2012, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[31]  K. Tong,et al.  Sensorimotor Control of Tracking Movements at Various Speeds for Stroke Patients as Well as Age-Matched and Young Healthy Subjects , 2015, PloS one.

[32]  Subashan Perera,et al.  Validation of a measure of smoothness of walking. , 2011, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[33]  N. Berthier,et al.  Development of reaching in infancy , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[35]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Making smooth moves , 2022 .

[36]  Joseph A. Doeringer,et al.  Intermittency in preplanned elbow movements persists in the absence of visual feedback. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  Etienne Burdet,et al.  Quantization of human motions and learning of accurate movements , 1998, Biological Cybernetics.

[38]  P. Morasso Spatial control of arm movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  Brian E. Granger,et al.  IPython: A System for Interactive Scientific Computing , 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[40]  Etienne Burdet,et al.  A robotic teacher of Chinese handwriting , 2002, Proceedings 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. HAPTICS 2002.

[41]  Hermano Igo Krebs,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Speed Profile Models for Wrist Pointing Movements , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[42]  T. Milner,et al.  A model for the generation of movements requiring endpoint precision , 1992, Neuroscience.

[43]  Rieko Osu,et al.  CNS Learns Stable, Accurate, and Efficient Movements Using a Simple Algorithm , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.