On the macroeconomic effects of establishing tradability in weak property rights

The New Economy is closely associated with computing & communications technology, notably the Internet. We discuss property rights to, and trade in, the difficult-to-define intangible assets increasingly dominating the New Economy, and the possibility of under-investment in these assets. For a realistic analysis we introduce a Schumpeterian market environment (the experimentally organized economy). Weak property rights prevail when the rights to access, use, and trade in intangible assets cannot be fully exercised. The trade-off between the benefits of open access on the Internet, and the incentive effects of strengthened property rights, depend both on the particular strategy a firm employs to secure property rights, and the protection offered by law. Economic property rights can be strengthened if the originator can find innovative ways to charge for the intangible assets. The extreme complexity of the New Economy and the large number of possible innovative private contract arrangements make it more important to facilitate the use and enforcement of private individualized contracts to protect intellectual property than to rely only on standard patent and copyright law. Enabling law is one proposed solution. Current patent legislation in the US has led to costly litigation processes weakening the position of small firms and individuals in patent disputes. The property rights of such firms and individuals could be strengthened with insurance or arbitration procedures.

[1]  J. Lerner 150 Years of Patent Protection , 1999 .

[2]  Samuel Kortum,et al.  A Model of Research, Patenting, and Productivity Growth , 1994 .

[3]  J. Schumpeter The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle , 1934 .

[4]  J. Eaton,et al.  International Patenting and Technology Diffusion , 1994 .

[5]  G. Eliasson Business Competence, Organizational Learning and Economic Growth: Establishing the Smith-Schumpeter-Wicksell (SSW) Connection , 1991 .

[6]  G. Eliasson,et al.  THE THEORY OF THE FIRM AND THE MARKETS FOR STRATEGIC ACQUISITIONS , 2005 .

[7]  Stakes and Stars: the Effect of Intellectual Human Capital on the Level and Variability of High-Tech Firms&Apos; Market Values , 1999 .

[8]  G. Eliasson From plan to markets , 1998 .

[9]  Solbjerg Plads IS APPROPRIABILITY A "PROBLEM" FOR INNOVATIONS IN DIGITAL INFORMATION GOODS? , 2002 .

[10]  Daniel K. N. Johnson,et al.  Forced Out of the Closet: The Impact of the American Inventors Protection Act on the Timing of Patent Disclosure , 2001 .

[11]  J. Hirshleifer The Private and Social Value of Information and the Reward to Inventive Activity , 1971 .

[12]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis , 1988 .

[13]  Lee Branstetter,et al.  Do Stronger Patents Induce More Innovation? Evidence from the 1988 Japanese Patent Law Reforms , 2001 .

[14]  Josh Lerner,et al.  Stronger Protection or Technological Revolution: What is Behind the Recent Surge in Patenting? , 1997 .

[15]  Alexis Jacquemin,et al.  Competitiveness and the Value of Intangible Assets , 2000 .

[16]  Josh Lerner,et al.  Preliminary Injunctive Relief: Theory and Evidence from Patent Litigation , 1996 .

[17]  Adam Fforde,et al.  From plan to market , 1996 .

[18]  P. Romer Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[19]  Erol Taymaz,et al.  The Knowledge Based Information Economy , 1990 .

[20]  K. Arrow Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[21]  G. Eliasson Ignorant Actors in the Resource Rich World of the Knowledge Based Economy - On Rational Management in an Experimentally Organized Economy (EOE) , 2004 .

[22]  Douglass C. North,et al.  The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History , 1973 .

[23]  R. Solow Capital theory and the rate of return , 1963 .

[24]  G. Eliasson Financial Institutions in a European Market for Executive Competence , 1991 .

[25]  Josh Lerner,et al.  The Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights: A Survey of the Empirical Literature , 1997 .

[26]  Jerome H. Reichman,et al.  Of Green Tulips and Legal Kudzu: Repackaging Rights in Subpatentable Innovation , 2000 .

[27]  Scott Stern,et al.  Measuring the "Ideas" Production Function: Evidence from International Patent Output , 2000 .

[28]  Y. Barzel Economic analysis of property rights , 1989 .

[29]  G. Eliasson,et al.  The limits of government : on policy competence and economic growth , 1998 .

[30]  Reiko Aoki,et al.  Product Development and the Timing of Information Disclosure Under U.S.And Japanese Patent Systems , 1995 .

[31]  Josh Lerner,et al.  150 Years of Patent Office Practice , 1999 .

[32]  R. Coase The Nature of the Firm , 1937 .

[33]  Z. Griliches,et al.  The Explanation of Productivity Change , 1967 .

[34]  Jonathan Eaton,et al.  Trade in Ideas: Patenting and Productivity in the OECD , 1995 .

[35]  Josh Lerner,et al.  Where Does State Street Lead? A First Look at Finance Patents, 1971-2000 , 2000 .

[36]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Evidence from Patents and Patent Citations on the Impact of Nasa and Other Federal Labs on Commercial Innovation , 1997 .

[37]  Gunnar Eliasson,et al.  Spillovers, integrated production and the theory of the firm , 1996 .

[38]  Erol Taymaz,et al.  Simulating the New Economy , 2004 .

[39]  Jean O. Lanjouw,et al.  How to Count Patents and Value Intellectual Property: Uses of Patent Renewal and Application Data , 1996 .

[40]  Gunnar Eliasson,et al.  The Firm as a Competent Team , 1990 .

[41]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Do Patents Matter?: Empirical Evidence after GATT , 2000 .

[42]  M. Kremer Patent Buy-Outs: A Mechanism for Encouraging Innovation , 1997 .

[43]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Stylised Fact of Patent Litigation: Value, Scope and Ownership , 1997 .

[44]  Mark Perlman,et al.  Entrepreneurship, technological innovation, and economic growth : studies in the Schumpeterian tradition , 1992 .

[45]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  International Knowledge Flows: Evidence from Patent Citations , 1998 .

[46]  J. Lerner,et al.  The Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights: A Survey of the Literature , 2004 .

[47]  J. Schumpeter Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung , 1913 .

[48]  G. Eliasson The Role of Knowledge in Economic Growth , 2001 .

[49]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al.  Patent Paradox Revisited: Determinants of Patenting in the Us Semiconductor Industry, 1980-94 , 1999 .

[50]  K. Arrow,et al.  The markets for innovation, ownership and control , 1993 .

[51]  Venture Capital and Management , 1982 .

[52]  Gunnar Eliasson,et al.  General Purpose Technologies, Industrial Competence and Economic Growth , 1997 .

[53]  G. Eliasson,et al.  The biotechnological competence bloc , 1996 .

[54]  T. Willett,et al.  Financial Regulation and Monetary Arrangements After 1992 , 1991 .

[55]  M. Brewer,et al.  Collaboration Structure and Information Dilemmas in Biotechnology: Organizational Boundaries as Trust Production , 1994 .

[56]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look , 2000 .