Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PETLIF): Current Techniques, Clinical Outcomes, and Narrative Review

Full endoscopic techniques are becoming more popular for degenerative lumbar pathologies. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (PETLIF) is a minimally invasive surgical technique for spondylolisthesis and lumbar spinal canal stenosis with instability. Nagahama first introduced PETLIF in 2019. This study investigated the clinical outcomes and complications of 24 patients who underwent PETLIF in our facility and compared them with previous studies. Literature searches were conducted on PubMed and Web of Science. The PETLIF surgical technique involves three steps to acquire disc height under general anesthesia. The procedure includes bone harvesting, spondylolisthesis reduction, endoscopic foraminoplasty, disc height expansion using an oval dilator, and intervertebral disc curettage. A cage filled with autologous bone is inserted into the disc space and secured with posterior fixation. Patients underwent PETLIF with an average operation time of 130.8 min and a blood loss of 24.0 mL. Postoperative hospital stays were 9.5 days. Improvement in VAS, disc height, spinal canal area, and % slip was observed, while lumbar lordosis remained unchanged. Complications included end plate injury, subsidence, and exiting nerve root injury. The differences between PETLIF and the extracted literature were found in patients’ age, direct decompression, epidural or local anesthesia, approach, order of PPS, and cage insertion. In conclusion, PETLIF surgery is a practical, minimally invasive surgical technique for patients with lumbar degenerative diseases suffering from back and leg pain, demonstrating significant improvements in pain scores. However, it is essential to carefully consider the potential complications and continue to refine the surgical technique further to enhance the safety and efficacy of this procedure.

[1]  Jiaguang Tang,et al.  Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation with percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with instability. , 2023, World neurosurgery.

[2]  T. Majima,et al.  A Narrative Review of Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Using Interlaminar Approach. , 2022, World neurosurgery.

[3]  Zhenyong Ke,et al.  Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes Between Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis , 2022, Frontiers in Surgery.

[4]  Haoyu Feng,et al.  Percutaneous Endoscopic Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression Vs. Open Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis , 2022, Frontiers in Surgery.

[5]  Haoyu Feng,et al.  Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic and open posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of single-segmental lumbar degenerative diseases , 2022, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[6]  Jin-Sung Kim,et al.  A pilot study of endoscope-assisted MITLIF with fluoroscopy-guided technique: intraoperative objective and subjective evaluation of disc space preparation , 2022, BMC Surgery.

[7]  M. Nogueira,et al.  PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION: RESULTS OVER 47 MONTHS OF FOLLOW-UP , 2022, Acta ortopedica brasileira.

[8]  Xinyu Liu,et al.  Percutaneous Endoscopic Robot-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PE RA-TLIF) for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Technical Note and Two Years Clinical Results. , 2022, Pain physician.

[9]  Yi Ding,et al.  Innovative Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Degenerative Instability: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial , 2021, Journal of pain research.

[10]  Jianmin Wei,et al.  Full-Endoscopic Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Epidural Anesthesia: Technical Note and Initial Clinical Experience with One-Year Follow-Up , 2021, Journal of pain research.

[11]  K. Sairyo,et al.  Full-Endoscopic Trans-Kambin Triangle Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Surgical Technique and Nomenclature. , 2021, Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery.

[12]  Zhen-Zhou Li,et al.  Technical Notes of Full Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Anterior Expandable Cylindrical Fusion Cage:Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes at 1-year Follow-up. , 2021, World neurosurgery.

[13]  Yue Zhou,et al.  A Modified Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Technique: Preliminary Clinical Results of 96 Cases , 2021, Frontiers in Surgery.

[14]  H. Kim,et al.  Evaluation of Two Methods (Inside-Out/Outside-In) Inferior Articular Process Resection for Uniportal Full Endoscopic Posterolateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Note , 2021, Brain sciences.

[15]  X. Guan,et al.  The endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: A Systematic review and Meta-analysis. , 2021, World neurosurgery.

[16]  Chao Wang,et al.  Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique Note and Comparison of Early Outcomes with Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis , 2021, International journal of general medicine.

[17]  M. Sharma,et al.  Full Endoscopic Lumbar Transforaminal Interbody Fusion in DDD Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease: A Latest Technique , 2020, International Journal of Spine Surgery.

[18]  H. Katoh,et al.  Short-term comparison of preoperative and postoperative pain after indirect decompression surgery and direct decompression surgery in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[19]  B. Wang,et al.  Full-Endoscopic Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Via an Interlaminar Approach Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Preliminary Retrospective Study. , 2020, World neurosurgery.

[20]  Masato Tanaka,et al.  Technical and Conceptual Review on the L5-S1 Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Surgery (OLIF51) , 2020, Spine surgery and related research.

[21]  Yazeng Huang,et al.  Minimally invasive surgery for low-grade spondylolisthesis: percutaneous endoscopic or oblique lumbar interbody fusion. , 2020, Journal of comparative effectiveness research.

[22]  Yue Zhou,et al.  Comparison of Preliminary Clinical Outcomes between Percutaneous Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases in A Tertiary Hospital: Is Percutaneous Endoscopic Procedure Superior to MIS-TLIF? A Prospective Cohort Study. , 2020, International journal of surgery.

[23]  Michael Y. Wang,et al.  Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion. , 2020, Neurosurgery clinics of North America.

[24]  N. Epstein Review of Risks and Complications of Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF) , 2019, Surgical neurology international.

[25]  Michael Y. Wang,et al.  Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion without general anesthesia: technical innovations and outcomes. , 2019, Annals of translational medicine.

[26]  Y. Ahn,et al.  Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a comprehensive review , 2019, Expert review of medical devices.

[27]  Y. Hai,et al.  Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Preliminary Report of Seven Cases with 12-Month Follow-Up , 2019, BioMed research international.

[28]  Manabu Ito,et al.  Early Clinical Results of Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A New Modified Technique for Treating Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis , 2018, Spine surgery and related research.

[29]  K. Rijkers,et al.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2017, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[30]  J. Choi,et al.  Perioperative Results and Complications after Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spinal Stenosis in Geriatric Patients over than 70 Years Old , 2017, Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.

[31]  Choon-Keun Park,et al.  Fully endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion using a percutaneous unilateral biportal endoscopic technique: technical note and preliminary clinical results. , 2017, Neurosurgical focus.

[32]  M. Winder,et al.  Comparison of ALIF vs. XLIF for L4/5 interbody fusion: pros, cons, and literature review. , 2016, Journal of spine surgery.

[33]  E. Carragee,et al.  Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. , 2016, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[34]  S. Kishida,et al.  Mini-Open Anterior Retroperitoneal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Degeneration Disease , 2015, Yonsei medical journal.

[35]  F. Schwab,et al.  Adult Spinal Deformity—Postoperative Standing Imbalance: How Much Can You Tolerate? An Overview of Key Parameters in Assessing Alignment and Planning Corrective Surgery , 2010, Spine.

[36]  R. Deyo,et al.  Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. , 2010, JAMA.

[37]  H. Aryan,et al.  Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. , 2006, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[38]  Motoki Iwasaki,et al.  Surgical complications of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with total facetectomy in 251 patients. , 2006, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[39]  Kevin T Foley,et al.  Minimally Invasive Lumbar Fusion , 2003, Spine.

[40]  L H Chen,et al.  Surgical Treatment of Adjacent Instability After Lumbar Spine Fusion , 2001, Spine.

[41]  J. Partanen,et al.  Local Denervation Atrophy of Paraspinal Muscles in Postoperative Failed Back Syndrome , 1993, Spine.